JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2009 to 2016 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 359 €;
60 users have given it an average vote of 7.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 205000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:focal handyman excursion, good yield easily to 18mm with uncorrectable bias, light and stabilizzatorn
Cons:usable only by f8 up, construction, clarity, dark, focus Unusual deco painful, collecting dust, opens by itself but we demand from a kit lens?
Opinion:took time with canon 600D, was an excellent lens to start and understand what were the focal more congenial to my way of taking pictures! I rnquasi all the photos I made in 18mm, and some have even had important merits and have been awarded ! rnci but I want to say that this is only usable by f8 f9-up, because at smaller apertures is best to take pictures with a cellphone.
Pros:Range of focal lengths, bayonet metal (if at this price is a considerable pro)
Cons:Sharpness, brightness, overall performance
Opinion:Taken with the 1200D kit, probably my not be a good example. I have constant and continuous problems in the out of focus images. Brightness separately (diaphragms are specified in the name, so you know what you buy) also suffers terribly slight drop in brightness. Sharpness least in my model that leaves terribly to be desired (compared with 75-300 and the gap between the two is enormous). Backlight to avoid, suffer enough problems flare He also suffers (at least my model) of strong chromatic aberrations. Vignetting quite clearly marked to F3.5 but nothing uncorrectable post. My advice is that if you want a zoom handyman, you should aim for another (24-105 F4 used). Lastly, it tends to accumulate dust in the internal lens.
Pros:clarity in relation to focal length - construction - Price
Cons:none for the excursion and high price of used
Opinion:Much, much better than the canon 18 200. I used the lens for a couple of years as a handyman from viaggio.Nitidezza less than all zoom 17-50 but almost better than canon 18 55. Compact with a zoom range apt. Price of used advantageous because it was included in the kit of various reflex. How handyman still always recommend the Tamron 17 50 smooth.
Pros:Focal comfortable, good construction, nuts comfortable, good stabilization
Cons:sharpness little more than discreet, dim, focusing slow.
Opinion:There is little to say, I have used this in mind several times in the events, is an optical fairly quiet, very comfortable to use, has a good zoom range, in the portraits is quite good, especially when used with today's APSC, would not recommend it for night photos because the stabilization is good but remains a lens very dark, like a little all the "f 3.5" canon of the house, it does not seem very durable as it is very plasticky, for macro and landscapes maybe traveling is not evil.
Cons:Poor quality materials, obvious vignetting at full length, when shooting "vertical" or hold the stock market does not stand still.
Opinion:How many goals to be set, it is clear that one can not expect a great goal. It 'was my first when I was less than beginner. He went with the 60D and the beginning I found it bad, as I have pretty good until I swapped with a 24-70 L series used. The move was traumatic (in a good way), as is normal since we are talking of one of the best optical L.rnI defects that were riscontravo immediately vignetting to 135 mm above and the fact that when I tried to make pictures with the machine "low" to 18mm because I could hardly objective "down" and could not keep up. Brought to the store, they told me it was a fault of all. So much so that the seller I opened another making me notice the defect. But nothing so grave.rnDa discard? Maybe not. For those who have claims is an effective all-rounder. I see it more objectively from entry level used in an absolutely beginner. For those who want to make good scenery, good pictures and some experiments. rnIl seems to be the newimproved slightly moist.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
