RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Wladimiro Cavina
www.juzaphoto.com/p/WladimiroCavina



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Wladimiro Cavina


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

sony_e11_f1-8Sony E 11mm f/1.8

Pros: Portability, 1.8.

Cons: I didn't find any.

Opinion: Excellent landscape lens, at 1.8 you can photograph cathedral interiors without having to go too high with the ISO. I took it around the Gothic cathedrals of northern France, including Mont Sam Michel, and it did the job I expected very well. In combination with the A 6000 it is a feather and I did not miss the stabilizer.

sent on November 13, 2023


canon_eos_rCanon EOS R

Pros: Dynamic range, FV, dual pixel, ergonomics, focus points, display, double-to-p sd

Cons: Lack gps, iso seal, raw format

Opinion: I can only compare with the 6D, still in my possession, on the landscapes, so no video nor ready AF. On the R, the tendency to burn lights has disappeared. Ability to reassemble in all ways and not only in M. FV is a holy hand. Cons: The Gps position is useful to remember the exact point of the shot but is missing, the CR3 looks more malleable than the CR2 but there is only one size, whole or compact and the pixels on each side are identical. A smaller format is useful for limiting noise to high iso, very annoying noise already to 800 in luminance and 3200 in chroma. I thought I'd sell the 6D but I keep it, with little light it's even better. The double-feet is a pleasant update but saving files of that size, although on the proper board is a bit slow.

sent on December 11, 2019


canon_35_f1-4Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM

Pros: Three-dimensionality, colors, blurred gradient.

Cons: Maybe AF kinda slow but nothing dramatic

Opinion: Bought on Juza Market by a certified user at a good price (strange but true) and... wonder. 6d mounted I think I'm going to disassemble it only if and when I pass to 6 d II. Perfect for portraits at 1.4-2 with a deadlift of planes and a blurred progressive dream. Shutting down it becomes a landscape blade where at 100% unimagined details emerge. Together with the 85 F 1.2 and the 135 F2 I consider them the magic triad of Canon House: the Magi. Now I do not know if the AF more Performand series II justifies the difference in price (3x), but I would say no to QI.

sent on December 22, 2018


zeiss_21Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 21mm f/2.8

Pros: Deus Ex Machina.

Cons: The Caps!? Just take them off before you photograph.

Opinion: I bought it used on the Juza market in October and now I can finally make a judgement. Perfect both from the optical and mechanical point of view. The focus ring with the perfect infinity at the end of the stroke ideal for the starry and not only. The merciless comparison I could do it with the Sigma 20 Art but this is light years away. With the Canon 16-35 F4 L IS a 21 mm and a F 8 if it pulls but up to only about fifty meters, then the power of this lens comes out, especially in the definition of the foliage in the background. In the Nocturnes is a marvel: Point and without smudges from side to side at 2.8, minimum distortion, absent AC, vignetting not received.

sent on May 13, 2018


sigma_20_f1-4artSigma 20mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art

Pros: 20mm F1.4 Virtual

Cons: unusable

Opinion: I 1.4 Article 24, a blade throughout the frame already in TA. I 'came out this supposed gem and made me throat that 10 degrees more. Not the 'I never did, son took a few days to realize the disaster. From the pictures on this show that was my example to be a "ciofeche". I thought that with the series art Sigma had a more efficient quality control but that obviously is not. Luckily the RCE of Rovigo gave me back my "old" 24 which had remained unsold and now I'm happy; I was left with the regret but do not feel like risking it again. D 'now on never Sigma without having them tested thoroughly.

sent on April 03, 2016


canon_100dCanon 100D

Pros: Portability, touchscreen practical, value for money, ease of 'use, the' perfect start.

Cons: If just-I have to find a flaw, I would say the lack of wi-fi.

Opinion: I wanted to pass on aps-c and I thought to 70d, then in a mall I find the "little one", the 'last, to 499 euro with 18-55. The-fly also following the advice of this site. Coming from 4/3 was a significant jump, and now I'm delighted. The software is user friendly and in a couple d 'hours you store everything. Beautiful and useful in difficult lighting conditions can make HDR in your room. Of course, unfortunately, all this is done in JPG. To be able to do with the size of the RAW in human time, it takes other buffers and other processors. . Poor battery life? With ten euro you buy a 1200 mAh battery. With eos utilities you can manage remotely from PC lacks only the wi-fi to manage smartphones. Now look "accasarla" with some good lens to make it big.

sent on February 06, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me