|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alecs Tv www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlecsTv  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro Pros: Sharpness, focus, stabilized, construction and solidity. Cons: The weight but only during transport. Opinion: Purchased after passing through FF I took it for macro (before I had 60 micro Nikon APS-C) but also for portraits. I must say that I FULLY satisfied with both situations. And 'a particular lens, with its own character, and the more you know and the more you can take advantage of. Always very accurate, with a focus very pleasant and effective stabilization. The AF is fast and quiet. Having bought recently I have solved the problem ring. To me no defect. The only drawback (but only for transportation, then the use is a pro) is that the stock market cluttered and weighs but if not it would be another lens then, having chosen, hate me his weight. Highly recommended. sent on June 12, 2016 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C Pros: Quality / price ratio, autofocus, versatility, build quality, clear for how much (you can not compare to aobiettivi 5,000 EUR or more). Cons: Bracket tripod short and uncomfortable, with little light is more difficult to engage the AF (but for its cost can not expect more). Opinion: I took it to replace my beloved Sigma 120-400 I used Nikon D300. Having passed to the FF with the D750 I had become very corto.rnPrimissima impression: much improved construction, weight maggiore.rnPrimo use: it was love at first vista.rnOra I'm beginning to consocere better and begin to exploit its potential although not yet fully. I must say that the value for money is very good in my opinion. Only a few years ago nobody would have imagined buying a 600mm stabilized (albeit zoom) to 1000 Euros. I find it's well-built, with a great AF (fast and accurate) and equally good stabilizer. The number of clicks to place increased significantly compared to the previous coupled D300 - 120-400. Good lenses but not comparable to fixed TOP. But what I could not expect more than this amount? I think it's a good buy, I am fully satisfied. And in the end I realized that even a few pounds more stand it without much effort, even after a full day in excursionistsit. For me it deserves a full 9. Nine because it will never results slow to TOP and you can not disregard it but if I had to evaluate it for what it is, namely a 600 zoom 1100 Euros and also relatively light, it would deserve a full 10. Does its job very well, that for which you bought, even better than I expected from a lens of this value (very low compared to lenses TOP). The step-up from 120 to 400 (I speak at optical yield) was equal to that made by the body (D300 - D750). sent on September 03, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4 D Pros: Construction of the past, lens quality, focus, color rendering, maximum aperture space. Cons: Difficult to find unless you just do not like the typical yield of this goal. Opinion: It 'a lens clearly and specialist in his field does his work with excellence. E 'in my opinion (or was, I have never been able to try the successor born to digital), a masterpiece of the lens. Definitive. So much so that I keep it and use it despite I switched to digital for years. The only drawback might be that not like his typical yield battered and creamy but for portraits is something extraordinary by adding the amazing focus. It loves it or hate it, but I think very few can not amarlo.rnSolido, fast in FA despite his age, but lacks autofocus does not feel the need too view the maximum aperture. And if someone bought it to use it to f11 was better spent on something else. Hood "past", a metal screw. Weight and solidity type vintage lenses. In short, that is, a thoroughbred character. sent on February 08, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Excellent sharpness, construction, weather sealed, autofocus and VR very effective. Cons: Flare backlit, distorts to 24 more of my Tokina 16-28 to 16, slightly short to be perfect as factotum. Opinion: Purchased in kit with D750 replaces my previous 18-200 on APS-C of which I was satisfied. I chose this lens rather than the 28-300 because I think it is superior. In fact I am very satisfied. For a zoom lens very qualitative, solid, tropical conditions and very versatile. If we really want to make him the fleas would have preferred a greater excursion type at least 150mm but then the 24mm (compared to 28 of the alternative) make me very comfortable using it as a lens to travel, reportage, street. Given the value of the purchase in kit worth all the money spent. Excellent paired with FF that are more demanding of the APS-C lenses. sent on January 06, 2015 |
 | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: Sharpness and little distortion (for the type of lens) are the first things, solid construction and the value for money definitely beneficial. Cons: Flare backlit, fire selector automatic / manual impractical. Opinion: I bought this lens at the suggestion of the dealer, I was directed to Samyang and I must say it was a board of which I thank him very much. This objective has surprised me for its quality, in every sense. Probably is better but not at this price. that is all that I paid. Utilizzabilissimo with very little distortion even at 16mm. sent on January 06, 2015 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Solid, ergonomic, excellent performance at high ISO, versatile, autofocus and white balance perfect Cons: Personally I do not like the display tilting, lack protection display Opinion: I switched to FF after an extraordinary, but outdated, D300 which I was absolutely satisfied except for the performance at high ISO, but at the time there were no outstanding equipment that allowed the 6400asa with agilità.rnConfermo that pass from one body D300 / D700 to D750 first impact from negative impression but you have to understand why. The reason is carbon and magnesium used in reality is anything but a body "delicate." If one considers only the initial impression without analyzing the reasons would be like saying that a tripod is a carbon ciofeche because it weighs half of my initial in alluminio.rnL'impatto also involves learning a variety of settings in the menu and for customizable buttons to which I was not used. Some things were settable via other rings were not right on the D300. But taking the hand of the functions and selecting buttons is really all on hand. At first it's just difficult to remember which function you have assigned to which pulsante.rnMacchina robustissimae versatile, that is the amount paid. The limit of 1/4000 is a limit only for those who do not consider that the previous machines did not allow you to set the ISO 50, the end is the same. For me absolutely useless when WiFi and Video (perhaps a Giono take them into account but now I do not care). Autofocus, white balance, exposure latitude I find them amazing, better than I thought reading the various posts. If I can give an example was how to move from a tube TV to a flat LCD. Not a step forward but a walk. The files produced are very easy to work (even already JPEG). Fantastic feature that allows me with a key to use the old DX lenses or to crop my 120-400 having done a multiplier of 1.5x (or 1.2) in the car. Fantastic. sent on December 19, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
