|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ciandy www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ciandy  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: dimensions, focal range, AF Cons: Strange flares, distortion, vignetting, absurd price Opinion: I have owned the lens in question for a few months and after a few hundred photos taken I can say that it is neither meat nor fish. Low weight, but to my scale still marks 640 gr and not 540 as stated, small dimensions, autofocus that as much as needed in a wide angle is very quiet and fast. The cons are varied and annoying, really obscene vignetting at 14 mm, totally black corners, sample distortion, never seen anything like that even on the 14 mm samyang that costs 4 times less. the beauty is that once thrown into the LR meal the vignetting disappears and the distortion disappears (but not always) also thanks to the fact that it is not a 14 mm but a 12 that is then corrected and cut out. Flare strange and ugly, shooting against the light I noticed in almost all the times when the light is lateral and quite strong colored shades and circles that are not fixable in post in the starry flare. Result far from even a humble tamron 17-35 that I previously owned and never gave me problems. The sharpness has never thrilled me but I reserve other tests In conclusion if you want a light, compact all-rounder lens with wide focal range is fine. What is not good is the price, paid 1760 euros for a lens that at best should be sold at 1000 euros or so. In short, it does not excel in anything but you photograph almost everything without problems with an unjustified economic outlay. sent on September 15, 2022 |
 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD Pros: lightness, sharpness, footprint Cons: external af, lack of distance scale, vignetting at 17 mm Opinion: Finally a wide zoom with which you can do everything or almost everything. I don't understand what nikon is waiting for to do with it. Very sharp all over the frame, very light, compact. The only mole that vignettes well at 17 mm and on the nocturnal is irrecoverable on the sides. If it had been a starting 15 mm it would have been an unsurpassed and definitive wide angle in my view. sent on January 20, 2021 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: weight, sensor, price Cons: AF, WB Opinion: Machine used under any climatic conditions, snow rain fog -12 and never missed a shot. For the new/used price a must for those who want to start, sensor with exceptional dynamic range. AF that just comes down a little light that abandons you and you are forced to sechedo by hand. sometimes incorrect white balance if set to auto sent on January 08, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: focal excursion, VR, weight Cons: disastrous angles at 16 mm, water infiltration Opinion: after a year of use I can say that the defects outweigh the merits. The focal range is excellent the weight quite contained although not the stated one (720 gr with lampshade) combined with an exceptional VR for freehand photos that I regret very much. Unfortunately, the lens is only tropicalized on paper, following a trip to Iceland with frontal spray from a waterfall (not direct water on the target) and dried immediately were formed concentric rings inside the lenses, perhaps remnants of limestone/ dirt as a result of drying forcing me to sell it at a price to say the least ridiculous. Disastrous 16 mm angles, in some cases you are forced to cut them from how opaque and insharp they are. sent on January 08, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
