JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD : Specifications and Opinions

The Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2018 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 700 €;

26 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Specifications
Focal lenght	17-35 mm
Angle of view	103.7 - 63.5°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8-4
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	15 elements in 10 groups
Min. focus distance	0.28 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.20x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	460 g
Dimensions	84 x 93 mm
Buy
Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 237000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Gidrijus

sent on July 30, 2019

Pros: Sharp, light lens, has f2.8 on 17-20mm (good for astro photography). Zoom and focus rings has excellent smooth. Great coatings and weather sealing :) Has 77mm filter thread.

Cons: Missing numerical scale, previous model of this lens has it, so i dont know why Tamron wont added o this one. Not internal zoom what mean bit of front lens is extending on zoom few mm. On autofocus mode, focus ring zooms and spins itself wile focusing, so be aware where you hold your hand. Significant vinieting on f2.8 but can be fixed in post or reduced in camera. Lens cap is horrible, always falling off :(

Opinion: I got it 2 month after getting on market. Love it. Great my old Tokina 11-16mm replacement on FF. Love it and try to use it as much i can. Got it for landscape and astro photography sort of 2in1 lens. Haven't tried on astro yet, but i will try for sure soon. Highly recommend on FF body as 16-35mm cheaper option (stuffed with great specs) great price and quality balance.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Grekez

sent on May 09, 2023

Pros: All do, light to be a zoom. Excellent sharpness but never as a fixed. Exceptional value for money.

Cons: Mah maybe the sharpness but against a fixed.

Opinion: Spectacular lens a very light zoom for landscape and street. Vignette slightly at full opening as they have already said but nothing serious. I had several zoom and fixed wide angles. I must say it loses a bit 'with the latest generation fixed (Sigma art- Nikon G) but with the zoom does not lose anything indeed sometimes even better. I also had the 15-30 2.8 1' I did not see all this difference except for the weight. Even with 14-24 Nikon indeed perhaps the latter even a little worse. So for me a well-deserved 9.5! Brava tamron!

Roby82

sent on June 12, 2022

Pros: Very light, excellent sharpness, contained flare, minimal distortion.

Cons: It is not a superlative lens with exceptional sharpness.

Opinion: I tried it in different light conditions and I must say that it defends itself very well. It manages very well the backlight, contained flares (but still present), good sharpness in the shadowed areas and, in any case, more than acceptable results in situations of strong contrast. Vignette very few0, its 17mm are interesting and give satisfaction; the sharpness at full aperture is not bad, from f4 onwards it improves considerably. Ideal diaphragm, in my opinion, f 6.3. The comparison I made with my Sigma Art 24 1.4 (I know it is not a fair comparison, moreover it is a fixed, but I only have this to compare the lenses): if you buy the Tamron to make landscapes or as an all-rounder for excursions, we say that it is a great choice because, if you know how to use, you will take home photos in almost all circumstances. If you are looking for excellence from every point of view, there is little to say in front of Sigma. Its 24mm are clean, zero distortion, gives a sharpness already at full aperture unthinkable for other mid-high range lenses. Where the Tamron touched the limit, with Sigma I obtained not only greater precision for the most distant details and rather neutral colors, but a tone was perceived, a background character that transpired from the photos giving something that other lenses do not do. If you find it used under 500 € do not miss it, otherwise you can find better.

Lookaloopy

sent on July 11, 2021

Pros: Light, Very sharp, Small, 2.8 up to 20mm, tropicalized.

Cons: Motor AF a slow wire

Opinion: This is an extraordinary objective. Sharp from edge to edge, resolving, very light and compact. The only flaw, but venial being a UWA, is the AF engine a bit slow. It maintains an excellent balance even if used with adapter, it works really well, it does not regret the Canon L which, however, require a double outlay, and clutter and weigh much more. That 2.8 aperture on the wide-angle focal length makes it also suitable for photos of the Milky Way. It is also tropicalized. What else could you want?

Roberto92

sent on May 15, 2021

Pros: Sharpness, yield, bokeh, brightness, price, weight, upgradeable, 77mm filters

Cons: AF, lack distance scale

Opinion: Excellent lens that fully reflects the excellent standards achieved by the new Tamron lines. Beautiful aesthetic "business style" (except for the matte paint too prone to scratches), very good build quality in relation to the low weight: it does not give me at all a sense of fragility, the movements of the helicoid are fluid and precise and the optics are well balanced. It mounts the widespread 77 mm filters. The only drawback is the af of old conception, there is no "full-time manual focus" (or MF override), as is now possible on almost all modern lenses, so between MF / AF there is just a physical trigger ring-engine, therefore you must NOT focus manually if in AF mode. The focusing speed is good but not excellent, typical of non-ultrasonic motors. Optically, however, it is a jewel: very sharp already at TA (it is an F2.8 up to and including 20mm and an F4 beyond), especially in the center of the frame, but the edges are still excellent; the color rendering is faithful and the contrast very good; excellent resistance to flare; good distortion control and above all the possibility of correction in post-production (while distorting, especially in the 17-20 range, it does not have "wild" distortions); the minimum focus distance of only 28 cm allows creative use (with a very pleasant bokeh), maintains excellent quality at the upper end of the focal length (I compared it to 35mm F4 with my 35 Z and holds up well). Coma very well controlled, which, combined with the 2.8 of the first 3mm, also make it an excellent candidate for astrophotography. In addition, it is compatible with the console tap-in and can be updated and adjusted. I use it with the latest firmware of its (2) on my Z6, and it works perfectly, with the advantage of the IBIS. Nikonists just have to be careful about incompatibilities with older bodies: it has the electromagnetic diaphragm for which the same limitations apply as the Nikkor "E" lenses. Knowing both the Nikon AF-S 18-35 and the Canon 17-40, I'm sure I can say that this is superior to both. Finally, excellent price, especially if import. Rating 10-.

There are 5 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD

Snæfellsnes - Iceland

by Sara Trucano
35 comments, 3277 views [editors pick]

A fairy tale called Iceland

by Andrea Curzi
86 comments, 2359 views

Overview at Passo Giau

by Andrea Curzi
46 comments, 1786 views

Sugar Loaf Sunset

by Luka180
40 comments, 5993 views

Alba to Punta de Hidalgo

by Andrea Curzi
38 comments, 978 views

Castle of Tora

by Renni
123 comments, 2119 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

Infinity

by Luka180
25 comments, 4032 views

Centered the scene for 228 million years

by Stefano Marangoni
93 comments, 4139 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

A large tower for a small village

by Davidendo
36 comments, 1245 views

Walk at sunset

by Actdrum
34 comments, 2210 views

HI RES 7.0 MP

Long live Halloween

by Renni
131 comments, 1917 views

HI RES 20.5 MP

Back in the Calascio tempo_Rocca

by GermanoG
28 comments, 3247 views

HI RES 23.6 MP

Hair of Venus, views of enchantment

by Elìa Pellegrino
20 comments, 1312 views

Autumn.

by Rino Orlandi
24 comments, 1303 views

HI RES 20.6 MP

The Cathedral of Siena

by Renni
102 comments, 983 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

On Tingiosu Sunset

by Luka180
22 comments, 3482 views

A city well

by Renni
84 comments, 1279 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

After the rain ........

by Elìa Pellegrino
32 comments, 1354 views

Portu Band Sunset

by Luka180
9 comments, 2740 views

Vestrahorn from Iceland

by Sara Trucano
20 comments, 1017 views

Spring explodes at Baccoleno

by Andrea Curzi
20 comments, 594 views

Don't touch my sandwich.

by Rino Orlandi
20 comments, 4491 views

HI RES 22.3 MP

Castle of Tora

by Renni
72 comments, 844 views

HI RES 23.0 MP

Santa Maria Maggiore

by Renni
103 comments, 1276 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

The Iguazu.... de noantri

by Stefano Marangoni
49 comments, 1056 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

One, none, 100,000.

by Rino Orlandi
19 comments, 1079 views

HI RES 11.5 MP

Welcome to the hell

by Andrea Curzi
28 comments, 287 views

Todi in the evening

by Renni
72 comments, 747 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

Innocence.

by Rino Orlandi
18 comments, 1317 views

HI RES 33.3 MP

The giant of the street

by Stefano Marangoni
45 comments, 1089 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

About Riu Sunset

by Luka180
22 comments, 1402 views

The "Fjord" of Lazise

by Stefano Marangoni
59 comments, 2039 views

Touch of light

by Elìa Pellegrino
4 comments, 1006 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Cortona - Basilica of Santa Margherita

by Renni
57 comments, 871 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

Atare of the Fatherland

by Renni
85 comments, 1332 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

When the light flies.

by Rino Orlandi
23 comments, 1364 views

HI RES 11.6 MP

So close, so far...

by Stefano Marangoni
46 comments, 1667 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Tamron » Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD

Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD