|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giangiacomo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giangiacomo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Venus Laowa 7.5mm f/2 MFT Pros: Incredibly compact, especially on pro bodies (Panasonic G9) the lens is tiny, beautiful colors, ultralinear with insignificant distortions Cons: At the moment none, let's just say the fact that it does not communicate with the body, but you know when you buy it Opinion: It's an exceptional lens, period. Tiny and perfectly linear, with lovely colors. At F4 it becomes a razor, at F2 it is slightly soft, and has a tendency to vignette. Also used up to F8 (in extreme light conditions) it has no particular diffraction - better to use it up to 5.6. The fact that you can mount filters is a non-negligible plus, the hood does its duty, even if it really looks like a fake toy. Among other things, to mount the hood you need to remove the front cap, just as you can not put the cap with the hood mounted outwards, not bad, you risk less to forget it and take a beating. It is a particular lens, which can give immense satisfaction to landscapers, as well as those who deal with real estate. If you take it with you on the road, it is difficult to be replaced by other lenses unless they are canvases. Note: the focus peaking in the room is useful, not essential for landscapes of course, but the lens has a minimum focusing distance really close, so if you want to use it for that, better to have a camera with focus peacking sent on October 21, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 Pros: Tiny, razor-sharp, color rendering from PRO, all metal, manual focus in one click Cons: A little bit of flare, you can make creative Opinion: Is a 35 mm equivalent that pleases use as main lens for the exits or urban tourism. Is the lens with the uppercase O for the street, thanks in part to the PDC. Is a lens that "tells a story", as usual at this focal length, who knows how to do this and take advantage of the eye can glean great satisfaction. PS. about the hood, with a few euros on "zanzanzon" or "Bay" is easily sent on April 17, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ Pros: More compact than a fixed lens! Bright enough to be a 3.5-5.6, coupled to the em10 or em5 Pocket machine Cons: Extends a lot of on (but it is inevitable for the type of goal), has an absurd tendency to balance white towards the gray/beige even under strong sunlight Opinion: Great lens, it was the first of my fed m43 Kit, and unlike other, a lens that won't sell. WINS hands down on any 18-55 of march more noble, for clarity and compactness. MAF fast enough even in low light, allowed me to take 2 seconds too Freehand into town in the dark by grabbing the moving objects in a precise and clean, I didn't have a real 1:1 comparison but the MAF I think faster than the 12-40 PRO (which is pa ten of my Kit). As quoted in against, pity the absurd tendency to balance white towards the gray/beige even under strong sunlight, nothing irreparable provided you shoot in RAW. sent on April 17, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: Tiny to be a equivalent 24-80, bright, great grip, sharp almost as much as a fixed, hood spectacular chromatic aberration almost non-existent Cons: Suffering from a bit of flare that can be exploited with creativity Opinion: An outstanding all-rounder, certainly is no longer able to hold the camera in your Pocket as other lenses, but it's a PRO and the quality you see again and again. Combined with a quality ND filter and an external flash (even the Olympus supplied is ok) becomes an invaluable tool for every eventuality, from the landscaping to the Interior, the street is almost "shortly" for my taste, but other lenses (fixed) are certainly more indicated. My rating is 9 out of 10, no doubt sent on April 17, 2018 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Pros: Stabilization, compactness, portability and lightness, tropicalization, chromatic rendering, macro and impressive micro contrast, excellent Jpeg processing, better use of many DSLR Pros, tilt display, unparalleled remote control, endless lenses (for all pockets) and compatibility with a tide of vintage lenses (some with very low cost and exceptional yield) Cons: Menu ... to understand with a bit of philosophy, perfect AF, low battery life (buy two from now!), Of course bokeh "scarce" if you do not use goals considered "extreme" for the DSLRs but that they have, in the m43 fairly humane costs, in relation, even in PRO versions Opinion: It is a PRO with acceptable costs, 100% recommended. After so many years with Nikon, with great hesitation, I started selling ALL the kit and wanted to change radically, tired of bringing me kg of expensive equipment while being just an amateur. I have to say that there are months that I'm wondering why I did not do it before! RnHo spent thousands of euros changing bodies and goals, always looking for that chromatic rendering and that micro contrast that I never found satisfying (probably for my fault) with the Nikon I had. The first shot with the little Oly made me fall in love right away! RnStra recommended 10 +++ will not come back indietrorn again sent on November 10, 2017 |
 | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Sharpness in TA, fire without any uncertainty, is a zoom, but it works as a fixed Cons: a bit 'heavy, unbalanced on D5100 Opinion: I fell in love at first click! Should have someone using APS-C and has passion as photography, knows reevaluate your machines and your self-esteem: D I think I'll wait a long time before going (maybe) in fullframe! Sigma Thanks! rnNon you will never regret buying and looking in used also keeps the price is perfect, my vote 10 and praise. sent on November 24, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: The best photos with DX, brightness Cons: Chromatic aberration and flare against the poor, ring plasticky, plasticky body - ok for the price but Nikon always expected something more Opinion: I think it's the best lens I have in the kit, that maybe - just maybe - could be replaced only by the next purchase of Sigma 18-35 F1.8, which promises less chromatic aberration and ghost.rnPer else has incredible detail, the VR does not need almost never unless fotografiate night and did not feel absolutely mancanza.rnSu DX corresponds to a 52.5 is in effect a "normal", that unlike the zoom "teaches" to make photos, about the composition and the fact that it is * necessary * spostrarsi to "zoom" .rnUn lens which I must not fail, perhaps with a UV filter and possibly an ND just to avoid the images fantasma.rnAssolutamente recommended, especially given the price! sent on November 17, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
