|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andypulse www.juzaphoto.com/p/Andypulse  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Colors, weight, AF, image stabilization, build quality L series Cons: none at the moment Opinion: Let me start by saying that I am using it for a short time and that I have not yet tested thoroughly but I review this lens that I really do. The color rendition is truly amazing, beautiful colors and not overly saturated, lightning-fast and precise auto focus IS helpful though not essential in wide angle, lens hood is modest in size and therefore not cluttered like that of his cousin 17-40. Obviously I will not list the strengths that wide-angles have on photography "street" but I emphasize that the 16 mm they are necessary to bring home the creative shots. If like me you passed by 17-40 to this 16-35 you'll see just how remarkable the difference. Used cars value really palatable. sent on April 23, 2018 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Construction, weight not excessive, sharpness at TA, colors, blurred, price Cons: Nothing to do with it Opinion: I use this lens for a while ', I made a sickness to have it, including photos and reviews seen on the forum I decided to buy it. Combined with a full size FF is certainly a winning combination, use it at the maximum aperture is almost a game, the baked files have beautiful colors and have a nice vignetting. I used it on 6D, 5D old and 5DIII and paradoxically the best results I got them on the old 5D tank. In my opinion the AF modules very pushed (5DIII) do not always have the best on those "prehistoric", to make an example with 5D old to TA on only 2 shots one was perfectly in focus while on MKIII accuracy is not so to good level, opinions and purely personal experiences. Finally I would recommend this lens to anyone who wants to try a super bright at a reasonable price. sent on December 28, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: File, FF, essential menu Cons: Nothing to report considering the age of the room Opinion: Purchased for a photographic journey by a user of the forum I immediately realized that I had bought a piece of Canon history. The body is rightly heavy and robust, the menu is easy and essential. The files are really good and not heavy. There are also some "counter" type made iso speed and burst but considering the age of the room and the cost in the used Dell market I do not feel like weighing them too much. Highly recommended sent on December 24, 2017 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: sensor, weight, affordable, RAW Cons: burst slow, too slow .... Few AF points (to their users) Opinion: At one year of purchase I am satisfied with the 6D. It 'a FF entry level, the AF points are few (I always use the central and recomposed), the sensor is a real bomb, shooting virtually in the dark and the quality of RAW files is excellent. rnIl WiFi? Comfortable, with a simple tablet via the Canon application you can see the preview photos on a larger screen, the 6D display is not much che.rnIl GPS? I do not use often but those times I used looked like it very precisorn sent on August 10, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: color rendering, out of focus, series L, three-dimensional ' Cons: hood Opinion: I have this goal to be six months, found at a fair price on the market, before I was in possession of 24-105 L. Needless to say, the leap was really significant, the photos now have more character, a three-dimensionality that I sometimes "moved" and that makes the subject appear "live", coupled with the 6D I'm taking away some satisfaction. Waiting to leave for the first real trip to test it definitely are very happy with our purchase. It remains to say that it is not a simple lens to be used even if the auto focus module is very precise several photos I found myself having to discard since the large sensor of the FF, the HPs reduced to 2.8 and the way I shoot (recomposed) It makes things a little more difficult. With the 24-105 L it IS is easier to have a loooong ferma.rnLa image would recommend? YES, one is as big as a house. Some photos are poetry:) rn sent on July 29, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: virtually all Cons: stabilizing a bit noisy Opinion: It 's my first zoom and really are satisfied. For those who make photographic safari 200 mm unmultiplied I am a bit short. I find it a very useful lens to take with when traveling, very clear already at maximum opening and closing improves a few stop the diaphragm. It 'a feather, very light considering also the presence of the stabilizer. Ugly and uncomfortable the lens hood, slightly noisy stabilizer and cumbersome. If you want quality and a abordabile price, on the market are good offers, this is a lens to be reckoned with. sent on May 23, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Value for money, versatility, autofocus, optical L, stabilizer Cons: distortion and vignetting at TA FF Opinion: Excellent quality / price ratio in the market takes home less than 500 euros. The 'optical zoom range makes it a very versatile, both for portraits to landscapes is you get good results. The focus is pleasant, F4 a little limiting. Distortion and vignetting quite evident (on FF) but easily recoverable in PP.rnSoddisfatto purchase. sent on October 26, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
