|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Jste70 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Jste70  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Viltrox AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro Pros: Build, Price, Aperture, Sharpness, AF Cons: I haven't found any yet Opinion: I heard very good things about this lens, I informed myself and, after also seeing the video of its test made by the promirrorless channel, I was convinced to buy it. I have to admit that I did really well to get this lens, its performance in photos is equal if not even better than the best fuji fixed lenses and compared to the latter it costs about half. He has already become a starter in my kit, sending 23 and 33 f1.4 to the bench. If you have a fuji I can only recommend the purchase, you won't regret it. Needless to say, I've already ordered the 75 Pro as well. TIPA AWARDS 2024 awarded as best standard lens for APS-C sent on January 04, 2024 |
 | Hasselblad X2D 100C Pros: File quality, 1 tera of internal memory. Cons: AF just enough, very high cost of both the body and the lenses, basic menu. Opinion: I state that I have never had the opportunity to try a digital back, but with the X2D we are close to perfection with regard to file quality. I tried both Leica S and Fuji GFX100S both excellent, but this Hasselblad has an extra gear. It produces wonderful files, if enlarged to 100% monitor does not lose any quality. Very smart choice to insert inside the machine an HD from a tera (which may seem a lot but it is not so much also because a RAW easily exceeds 200mb) Another thing that I really like are the formats in which you can choose to shoot, inserted with the latest firmware update, including the x-pan format in addition to the classic square format. Unfortunately, however, the merits are already over .. The AF is just enough, I knew it is not the ideal camera for taking sports photos but I honestly hoped for something better. The battery has an honest lifespan and the iso hold up quite well up to 3200 and sometimes even up to 6400. I think it's the perfect camera to make landscapes and architectural photos even better if used on a tripod, or to take portraits in the studio. For "all around" use, compromises must be made. To conclude let's say that if you take it for everyday use it will probably make you think several times about the choice to have taken it, but when you open the files on the computer you will forgive everything. sent on August 17, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm GFX100S Pros: To date I believe one of the machines that produces the best file you can have in terms of quality. Dimensions "contained" to be an MF Cons: Real and tangible in my opinion nothing Opinion: It's a crazy machine, it produces excellent files with incredible definition. The must have for landscape designers and portraitists. But it's not the comfortable camera to carry around, not so much for the size of the body (which is as big as a fullframe SLR) as for the optics that are huge and heavy. It is not the machine for sports or birdlife or even for doing street, but for fashion, landscape or architecture photos I do not think there is a better machine today than this. sent on May 11, 2023 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Probably the best zoom in the system Cons: I haven't found any yet Opinion: Excellent lens from every point of view, combined with the new OM-1 is amazing, but it was no less even with the E-M1 mk3 or with the E-M1X. I honestly don't understand those like Mattia.a who seem to have opened an account on Juza just to speak ill of the m43 system. However, just look at the photos in the gallery below to understand that those who speak badly of it do not understand anything about photography. sent on September 30, 2022 |
 | Ricoh GR IIIx Pros: Almost everything Cons: the limits imposed by its essential nature Opinion: A small giant, it is hard to believe that such a small machine can churn out such beautiful files. It is pocket-sized, has a good yield at high iso, professional quality lens and sensor, in short, the perfect machine for street photography to go unnoticed and have high quality photos. The only sore point, at least for me, is the difficulty of framing with the display in situations of strong brightness. Someone complains about battery life, but it's like taking the panda and complaining that it has no trunk, the GRIIIx is certainly not a machine for long photo sessions. sent on July 11, 2022 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Summilux 10-25mm f/1.7 Pros: Fixed lens quality, versatility, construction Cons: Nothing comes to mind, maybe the weight. Opinion: Stratospheric lens, the holy grail for those who do ceremonies, pro fixed lens quality and versatility. Since I have it it has become the backbone of my wedding kit, equivalent to a 20-50mm in ff you make 2/3 of the photos of the service, it allows you to shoot in any light situation thanks to the aperture that opens up to f1.7, worth up to the last euro of its price. Combined with the new OM1 churns out excellent files that for quality do not make me regret at all the ff system. sent on May 26, 2022 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm f/4 Pro Pros: Optical quality, construction, tropicalization Cons: At the moment I have not found any Opinion: It is the lens that was missing, perfect for landscapes, travel and street. Its focal range (16-50mm equiv.) allows you to do everything without ever changing lenses. The fact that it is f4 is not at all limiting, because this lens combined with Olympus stabilizers can be used freehand even at times of a second if not more, as long as you photograph something immobile. The price is not low but is proportionate to the quality being a "pro" product. Another advantage is that you can mount the filters unlike the other wide angle pro (7-14) which does not allow it. sent on April 02, 2022 |
 | OM System OM-1 Pros: Viewfinder, tropicalization, stabilizer, battery life and improved high iso yield. Cons: excessive use can be addictive Opinion: I have been using Olympus for almost 20 years, from the E1 so I am absolutely biased, but for work needs until a couple of years ago I kept my foot in 2 shoes. I used Olympus for my personal photos and used a Canon ff kit for work. A couple of years ago I decided to abandon Canon and keep only Olympus for both my photos and work photos, after 2 years I can say that the choice turned out to be a winning one. With an m43 system you can work very well, and today the new OM1 confirms my choice even more. It is an excellent machine from every point of view, the new viewfinder looks like that of an SLR not a mirrorless, it has a very fast processor and churns out ORF (RAW) files that are so beautiful that they almost do not need post production, and this sorry if it is little means halving the hours of work at the computer. Finally, the iso yield has been improved compared to the previous model, not by much but by what was needed to take excellent photos (if you use the appropriate lenses of course) even in low light situations. Excellent machine. sent on April 01, 2022 |
 | Sony RX10 Mark IV Pros: It is an "all in one" machine in a small bag you can take from 24mm to 600mm and the lenses are from the Zeiss family. Cons: If you have the amount of an ultra-zoom you can not claim the quality of the fixed lenses as well, although compared to other ultra-zooms we are always one step ahead. Opinion: You can't have quality and quantity together, so you have to compromise but if you can please this compact Sony it can give great satisfaction. It has a small sensor (about 1/9 of the surface of a FF) but if you use it with the right light it is capable of producing excellent images. In a nutshell, the iso should not be raised and the exposure should not be recovered as with aps-c or fullframe. Do not use it to photograph the moon, at least I did it with bad results, while at 600mm in full sun the quality is still more than discreet. Perfect for a safari in Africa, as for a trip to the mountains or to steal a few shots in the city at a safe distance. Not suitable for nocturnal, indoor or all those situations where light is scarce. sent on November 09, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-H1 Pros: Well built, solid, tropicalized, stabilized, comfortable and intuitive controls, excellent yield with favorable light, double SD slot Cons: Batteries the duration is almost embarrassing (in a negative sense) AF in difficult light and in lack of contrast Opinion: I think it's a great machine for unprofessional use, but if you have to use it to work don't make the mistake that I made to abandon a Canon FF kit to move to Fuji. With Canon I could do a whole wedding with a battery and I was still advancing, with the XH-1 to finish a wedding it takes from 3 to 5 batteries, with the same ISO with an FF the yield is worse (but this depends on the size of the sensor and I knew it) but the thing ve dramatically dramatic is that it often fails to focus also and especially in group photos (yes, you read well, in the group photos where they are all still and posing) in these situations I always take 5 or 6 photos to be sure to take home at least one where everyone they have open eyes and smiling faces, often and willingly 1 or 2 of these photos are not in focus and the focus is always central at one point and the subjects do not move one step. Another embarrassing thing is the flash, the top of the range of course, which costs like the level peers of Canon and Nikon but that after a few shots (10 or 15) begins to sound to signal the overheating and you have to wait for it to cool down. If you plan to take it to do weddings and ceremonies forget it. sent on June 18, 2019 |
 | Leica TL2 Pros: It's a Leica, the quality of the optics is indisputable. Also good iso yield and improvements compared to the previous version would seem a lot, from the speed of autofocus. Cons: perhaps too innovative for those who are still too attached to traditional photography. Opinion: It's anti Leica, that's all that Leica is not all other. It is a perfect cross between a quality camera and a smartphone. One button, 2 timepieces and diaphragm rings (if you use it in M ??or A or S) and the rest is all touch screen like with the iPhone. it is certainly not the machine to go to photographing the son playing balloons or making naturalistic photos but if you do not feel a national geographic messenger every time you go out to do 2 photos is the perfect machine to use for light travel and take home quality photos. is not a reflex and does not have the performance of a professional reflex, but really do we need photo safari equipment in Kenya to take photos on the weekend? sent on September 22, 2017 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Pros: Price / quality, small, easy to handle, fun to use, has a nice file, free wi-fi with your smartphone, good yield at high iso, adjustable monitor, you can see the display in live view even before you take the picture , AF function touch screen (if you use the monitor to frame just touch the screen with your finger at the point where you want the focus and the camera takes the picture by focusing on where you touched the screen) Cons: maybe gave them but I do not I still found. Opinion: Beautiful and fun, and the more you use the more you want to use. It 's the proof that size does not matter, for use in their free time is perfetta.rnHa a lot of interesting ART filter with the supplied lens (the 14-42 / 3.5-5.6) to have very good results, but if you mount a lens on a bit 'more quality becomes a bomb, for example, I've mounted the 17/1.8 (equiv. 35mm film format) and does not take away him ever again. even with the 45/1.8 is amazing. sent on June 21, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
