|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sonnyrey www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sonnyrey  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-H1 Pros: Massive, improvements in general, stabilizer Cons: Price, Size, Battery, SVALUTATION Opinion: I've been using this machine body for a while now... I'll tell you what I think... It's definitely more massive than the X-T2, the larger body helps to give more feeling of robustness and improves grip but on the other hand, it loses a bit the sense of mL, that is, portability. The weight is more or less unchanged but the body grows closer to the bodies of the reflexes... It remains a great street car thanks to the fuji lenses, some really small... For example, I always carry it behind the use almost exclusively with fixed f2 lenses that are very fast, quiet and give a good yield. With these goals, you still notice the difference with the reflex... and with a little experience you can very well go unnoticed. It is designed for the professional, the one who wants a top photo and who, using it for work, the "mistreat" more than an amateur... It looks like an indestructible tank. Improvements in general there are and the stabilizer is really something spectacular. LCD at first I did not like it very much (I preferred the dial in the style of xt2) but I have to say that it has its own why and in the end comes very useful. More pros... you can shoot at 1/3 of a second in fluency, which is crazy (great for creative photography and video). The price is high to be an APS-C ... Okay it's a Top Gamma... but it's also almost 2000 coffees... and they're not a few... I switched to X-H1 from X-T2 because of a good offer... one of those "that you can not refuse" but for those who already own the X-T2 I do not think it is I would suggest to make the switch... The battery doesn't have a very long life but I don't have a problem because I have three... And i'm just... and then with the fuji system I greatly reduced the number of shots compared to those I did with the reflex and the thing I like the most is that often I shoot and the photograph is beautiful and ready... Touchscreen comfortable... even though I don't use it very much... Top sights... Despite everything I've written, I'd buy it back... I would never buy Fuji again... With what I paid for it (without bgrips and batteries) today I would buy 3 with bg and 6 batteries... On Fuji's part a real disrespect towards buyers... and say that his time I preferred it to Sony at7III ... sent on May 02, 2018 |
 | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Blurred by fear, price, construction, robustness, Cons: not received Opinion: An economic lens, indestructible, which gives a sense of magic to the photos as any vintage lens that respects ... Very little cost (I paid 40-50 euros with the included adapter for the Fujifilm system) .. The rendering is fantastic, especially on portraits, better than many much more expensive lenses ... I just finished writing a review on this lens and if you want to read it I leave you the link that will send you to my site http: // www.giuseppetripodi.it/zenit-helios-44-2-58mm-f2-0/ sent on December 04, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro Pros: price, sharpness, blurred, construction, Cons: AF, removable lens hood, Opinion: I just reviewed this goal on my site and I thought I would also stick my reflections on the lens here. It's the last goal I have bought and, since it's been a while since I use it, I think it's time to make a brief review to highlight those that I think are the positive and negative aspects of this lens .nn We immediately start by saying that it is a compact and lightweight lens, the dimensions are right, well proportioned to the Fujifilm machine bodies (I use it on an X-T2). Even the sharpness can not be fine. it's already clear at TA and it even cuts it to the edges. The construction seems to me very good and the fact that it is made of metal increases the sense of strength and strength when taken in hand (even the hood is made of metal). there is not much to say ... Fujifilm from this point of view is really a guarantee.rnAtesting and vignetting on the edges absent (or almost) also at TA and discreet flare resistance (here I thought better) .rn Price & egrave; honest. The lens costs around 600-650 euros but you can find good deals in the used market and you can take it home even by spending half the price list. RnGrawn the blur. Delicate, light, soft, with gorgeous colors. A great lens for portraits. Of course it's not the great 56mm f / 1.2R but its work does it very well, trust me. The salient point of this lens is the AF, not really performing, indeed we say it's pretty slow compared to the speed we used Fujifilm with its ultimate goals. It will not be superficial but it is not a good reason not to buy it. With the X-T2 it definitely improves its performance but even if it's not a lightning, I do not feel bad about it because, as far as I'm concerned, using it I've never "cobbled". Accustomed to the "superlative" nature of the reflexes and top range lenses this tiny 60 mm seems to "trick" too much at the time of shooting, especially in condithose of low light, but perhaps it's just a feeling, because once downloaded the files I hardly encounter unfocused photographs. It is not a "tip and snap" lens, it is thought to be "reasoned" photos and in fact its merits come out right when you take all the time it takes to snap. In these situations, you will not regret any other lens.rnAlso using it for macro photography if you dig it more than good, he convinced me.rnI did not like the fact that to take it out of the camera I must necessarily remove the hood because if in the position of rest (due to its generous size) does not allow easy movement of the lens. In conclusion, it is a slow lens that is not easy to tame, especially for those who are at first. It takes its time to get a bit of a hand and learn to exploit all its value but I honestly believe that anyone who has some practice with the world of photography and with Fujifilm should not have any problems and avr & agrave; many satisfaction from this small but worthwhile lens. I would recommend buying: Yes, no doubt. (Full review on http://www.giuseppetripodi.it/fujifilm-xf-60mm-f2-4-r-macro/) sent on September 19, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: Feeling of strength and pro body, af, electronic viewfinder, ease of use Cons: Improved menus and some buttons are awkward to click Opinion: After ten days of use I wanted to bring back some of my impressions "hot" on camera and write a recensione.rnL'ho tested properly on a trip to Umbria (to be honest I'm still here) and in the days that I did tourists through the streets of Assisi and during a matrimonio.rnÉ the review I wrote on my Instagram, written defect so as they come to mind the things I post without following a precise pattern ... I hope it can be useful to someone who is going to buy ... rnUna machine that immediately gives a top sensation, as soon as you pick it up you understand that Fuji took care of every detail, every detail, without neglecting anything, solid and with quality materials. Since we're talking about the top range of the brand it took for granted and it would be shameful if it were not so. RNA Actually, I had a better feeling with the X-Pro2 but I have chosen to bring home the XT2 AF (say more responsive) and the rings that allow you full control even with the machine off. The X-Pro2 has perhaps an ISO ring a little 'uncomfortable (which is activated by bringing up one of the times) but it will certainly be appreciated by older users Fuji seen celebrating the style that was present in older analog marchio.rnTornando of the review, I I tried to test it properly and only with the lens kit (18-55mm f.2.8-4) .rnPartiamo right from the lens. I was amazed. Everything seems less a kit lens. Finally a brand that has decided to use decent lenses for even the kit instead of the usual bottle of funds. The optical deserves and really recommend it to all those who do not like the fixed goals or who want to shoot right away, without sacrificing quality. No compromise even a nice gain than the 16-55 that weighs and costs twice as much, but that does not improve quality. A lens from the weight that you can carry with you all day without stancarvi.rnLa camera, as I have said on other occasions, is very simple and complex at the same time. rnUna once you understand everything becomes abba2339; I did but the ability to do so is reassuring in some situazioni.rnLa machine responds immediately. It is ready and responsive. Just point already focused and in manual the fun is guaranteed. rnAggancia always even in low light and found it greatly improved compared to that of xt1.rnUtilizzando programs also can speed up a lot but, in my opinion, we are not at the levels of an SLR. There may be, however. You can shoot in a split second but it is not its purpose. It allows you to get inside the scene (especially with 18-55) and also shoot without disturbing those around you by side. It goes unnoticed and you learn to think better. You learn to predict the scene and really capture the moment. All without attracting too much attention of others. rnSono was impressed by how easy it is to set the camera, shoot and get a picture without looking at the viewfinder or LCD. I did some tests in this sense, even in areas with little light (ed. Detc. within churches) and the result was beyond my expectations (because I do not get the same result with reflex despite the use for several years now) .rnHo then tried to shoot at people on the street, monuments, backlit , in dark situations, it bursts and doing long exposures and the car has always behaved impeccably. rnCon ISO I have gone up to 6400 and I must say that the results were beyond expectations and also from the side of the times I can only be happy to shoot at 1/8 (or less) without micro-rough. RNLA ability to shoot in fast times (1/32000 Electr.) then makes it possible to shoot at f. 2.8 in broad daylight and get fantastic portraits. rnPiccolo problem. I downloaded the SD in the most important moment of the wedding and saw that I had intended the second card to the jpg (because I want to evaluate precisely the difference between them and RAW) I lost a bit 'of time to enter the menu and find the sequential approach in second SD. Maybe it is my fault, for sure abetter knowledge of the menu or the quick keys would make it easier, but I (with my knowledge still "rough") is not just easy intuition to find the right voice (even though I knew what to look for) .rnVedere preview image is not a blast recently, especially for photography creativa.rnLo silent shooting (electr.) comes in handy in many situations because it really does not feel niente.rnLa battery, however, taking as I suggested before, but can last half a day or a better 2 spare is better to have them. RNLA app for the remote control is not fantastic. It took me two days to figure out how to transfer photos from the camera to the phone once associated. Not that it's difficult but the keys (or rather written) report different things than what useful tilting fanno.rnMonitor for verticale.rnScene pictures, films, movies etc. I have not tried them out yet. Not crazy I go to these things but I will do the same, as soon as I can to have a bit 'of time to study them meglio.rnI files seem very workable (I do not think what those of d750, but they work) and jpg are good and ready to use. rnCome second and third phase of testing are satisfied. In church I've only used the xt2 to ISO high and photos are very good. rnPer the moment is top marks even though, when I picked up the reflex to make some shots in the location where it is kept the receipt, the feeling I have with my D750, says er rubbish, "nun if he beats "and shoot at ISO 5000 without even check the shot is priceless ... which translated means feeling safe. rnih conclusion: good feeling - good - excellent practicality - transportability menu great - excellent picture quality - better than good workability - pro excellent feel - more than good manual - more than good speed - street excellent use even with 18/55 - Rep. Quality / reasonable / good price (it might seem expensive but there are much lower APSC with similar prices or already in Flash, pis; There). rnAffiancandola to an iPhone or other smartphone you have found the perfect companions for your travels ... rn sent on December 11, 2016 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, weight stabilization, solid feel Cons: Hood-looking fragile and diameter of 82mm Opinion: I bought this lens without actually having the need to cover the focal my disposal because of the already very good nikon 24 / 120f4 and three fixed lenses (28/50/85 all 1.8g) that I have not sold and which still use with satisfaction. I took it on a whim and because I wanted to minimize the backpack for medium / long runs where I can not load myself with slow but carry with me only the "triad" without making me too many thoughts. What about ... I almost did not deadlift more from my camera (d750) and use it in many occasions from street to landscape to portrait. I already knew the goodness of Tamron lenses as happy owner of a fantastic 15-30 and this is not far behind. In both cases I have preferred to corresponding nikon them and are not at all repentant. I read that some have found front / back focus, perhaps the first samples ... Or maybe it's just luck, mine is fantastic in every way, and the only fault is not having it ... Perfectly balanced with my SLR and weight & eacute; then so much ... At least I have only "heavy" slow and I'm not complaining ... It will be a question of habit sent on November 24, 2016 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Sharpness, and distortion aberrations almost absent, focal length Cons: But something is missing ... I do not know what .. And obviously expensive plate filters Opinion: The goal is in my possession for about a month and tried to stubborn properly ... Actually the yield did not surprise me that much more but only because I had already read and seen photographs made by other users, and then I knew what was waiting for me ... That is a lens from the fantastic clarity, able to reproduce the colors in an optimal manner and with a value for money really good price (the nikon 14-24 much more cost). The expectations have been met. no defects have not noticed remarkable (if I will edit this review) and I find it very convenient being able to move to a position that allows you to work at the top for both landscapes and also for the street. The weight does not think it's a problem for those who buy a view like that, a 2.8 weighs and then those who approach these lenses knows what they are getting ... I have not found "nice" the zoom movement ... Not there was a great feeling by turning from one focal and when I focus always prefer to rely on manual movement ofthe ring but perhaps it is just my determination that when shooting with wide-angle always prefer to do everything in mf ... The stabilization may be used when doing street but honestly it is not the reason why I chose this goal. Ability to shoot even at f 2.8 and thus not only for landscape use, for the stars, and the lack of aberrations cromentiche showy and rainbow made me prefer this lens to Tokina also competitive price compared to Nikon makes it very interesting. .. the purchase of this lens (I love it) but I have not (yet) led to sell 14 tammy 2.8 and / or 1.8 nikon 28 g and I think eventually I'll keep them ... I suggest buying if looking for a quality wide angle it is worth it sent on October 13, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Great handyman, weight (you read that right), quality Cons: price if taken out kit Opinion: Optical well built, heavy right and perfect for quiet travel photo light and without encumbrance, (covers focal most used). Many do not like but I (that use the d750) I find it perfect for both the fact that they weigh the same and so are bilanciatissime and because I do not like goals too light or too heavy ... Quiet, good performance and excellent if taken in kit (as in my case ...) Bought out kit is perhaps a little 'dear ... well ... maybe we remove the F4 fixed and Vr complement the excellent features of this lens ... Who can take the triad f 2.8 will turn away from this perspective but for everyone else, I can only advise you ... sent on January 21, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Crisp, bright, light, top price Cons: nothing seriously noteworthy ... Opinion: A simple goal, lightweight (easily fits in a backpack), bright and great price ... that will definitely make it a must ... I was not expecting who knows what and I was shocked to open the box and find myself with a small almost obiettivino giocattoloso ... (I love the vintage) Newly fitted but I noticed from the first shots the quality of the lens, really recommend it to everyone because I find it very versatile ... lends itself well to different types of photography ... sent on January 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
