|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Federico Visentin www.juzaphoto.com/p/FedericoVisentin  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 24mm f/2.8 D Pros: Clarity, weight, risolvenza, extremely correct Cons: I do not know Opinion: The use of D90, bought used, a fairy tale! RnNitidezza good already in TA, small, compact, fast, short, full of virtues, and for what it costs used, a shame not to have it if you use the DX is fissi.rnSu a bit of a heresy, but it becomes a nice 36mm, and ye shall have often attacked as hood use one of the 50 AF-D 1.8, the diameter of the filter is the same, and at least protects better reflections of the original metal, that on DX leaves much scoperto.rnrnUn field must be avere.rn sent on July 14, 2015 |
 | Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM Pros: Cost, focal length, AF speed, stabilizzatore.rn Cons: Painting delicate, zoom ring down with respect to ground, there is no clutch to zoom, then vertically shortens. Opinion: Bought as used again for the right price, the positive opinion in globalità.rnBuono lens stabilizer, comes up to three stops, sharpness usabilissima at maximum focal length of 12 mp aps-c closing two stops, at room temperature a fast and fur morbido.rnAutofocus precise, awkward zooming rotating direction, but there is abitua.rnIl weight is felt, but it is still usable freehand, in good luce.rnIn shadows or cloudy preferable tripod, using improves even a little bit nitidezza.rnOttimo purchase for general wildlife and birdlife if you can get close, it has the performance of a drive, but not the cost of acquisto.rnPreferito compared to 150-500 brother to the sharpness similar, but its lower weight, the big brother is almost relegated to use in the shed and began to be unwieldy freehand. sent on November 12, 2014 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: price, constant 2.8 aperture, light weight. Cons: focal length on aps-c, non-ultrasonic motor, no vibration reduction Opinion: Using a couple of years on D90, bought usato.rné my favorite handyman, allows you to switch from a normal (42mm equivalent) with a good telephoto (112mm) zoom .rnSe the comparison with other more professional FF is noted that the construction is cheap, it lacks the VR, there are treatments to nanocrystals, etc ... but is available at a great price, and weighs just 2.8 allows you to work without too much morbidezza.rnSu APSC is discovered on the wide side, which necessarily leads to a second purchase, at least for a fisso.rnResa chromatic distortions and kept in the backlight are not exciting, but more than honest, a couple of Edding in pp and you get good file. sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Pros: price, construction, simplicity. Cons: excursion of the barrel, lack stabilizer for photos freehand. Opinion: is one of the cornerstones of macro photography, straddling the short focal lengths (50-60mm) and the focal lunghe.rnbuono in all respects, will get you started seriously in the world of macro, without any problems or concerns particolari.rn90 mm are sufficient in everything, even to insects and butterflies, it makes up for knowing the habits of the subjects and exploiting hours migliori.rn sent on September 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: focal length, cost, and VR AF motor ultrasonic Cons: Nididezza over 200mm. Opinion: Tried for about 3 years, and after having squeezed well I can review it in serenità.rnVale what it costs, it's honest perspective, good for multimillion the world of telephoto lenses, the VR makes its job well and fast is the AF motor right .rnSi can range from portraits opening at RT for one blurred pleasant, hunting camera, but limited in distance to the subject and the focal length, from 200 to 300 mm decay is evident, is resolved by closing, but if the light is not great and climb with iso the final result decade. Use in zoo environment or protetto.rnDicono which is a bit dark, but I think it is not a defect, it is written on the barrel, then you already knows what you are buying, the criticism comes after use and the natural evolution of photographer, who realizes the limits of his lenses and by the time research the most appropriate to their needs or capacità.rnIl fact that there are many witnesses in the sale of the above, it is sicurously one of the best in the price range, but it has limitations that if you want to go beyond requiring an outlay ulteriore.rnDiscorso different if you stop the overall performance of up to 200mm, diventagià better perspective, although there are very valid better alternatives. rnIl classic zoom of first purchase, or the ones that push you towards mm and other investments, or changes gender and then his skills enough and avanzano.rn sent on September 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Weight, handling, colors, Boken ..... Cons: For those accustomed to ultradefinizioni is soft at room temperature, but already with one (1!) Stop improves dramatically, f / 2.2 is already buono.rnManca lens hood. Opinion: A must have! RnCosta little and has a great performance! It will have its glitches, (soft at room temperature), but as already written above with a single stop in closing much improved, with 2 stop goes perfectly, and reached its peak from f / 4 up to f / 9.rnHa a boken yummy and a good yield of the whole fotogramma.rnBasta, I repeat, is pocketable, it costs nothing for what it's worth, is a focal usabilissima, 2 steps back and really to become a 24, two steps forward and becomes a 75, a color rendering and microcontrast old style.rnl'unica excuse not to have a body with AF motor interno.rn sent on September 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Focal length, VR Cons: Optic kit Opinion: Purchased in kit form (D90) about 4 years ago, we can now pull the somme.rnSenza praise nor disgrace, doing her job, and the VR helps mm more than the 18-55 as well. The picture quality is good, usabilissima for a good PP and subsequent stampa.rnPersonalmente evaluated all the pros and cons would place it in between 18-55 and 17-55, has an obvious distortion in 18mm, but nothing that is not correct PP, suffer from a bit of sharpness more than 18 mm, 18-55 brother gets better, defends well between f / 6.3 f / 11.rnIl VR, doing her job, but I think 2 stop sensazioni.rnRicapitolando is an honest lens from the kit, there are of best (or 18-200VR 17-55VR), but have higher costs., in any case do not recommend the purchase if not in the kit, to the detriment of a trickle of sharpness (but there is talk of magnifications ) in favor of a 18-55rn sent on September 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Ergonomics, price, internal AF motor. Cons: Lack micro lenses, held above 800 iso Opinion: Love at first sight, bought in 2010, has accompanied me everywhere, and it was my school fotografia.rnCorpo compact car, but with the right ergonomics, not Tropicalised but never suffers, as long as you do not soak it or leave it under a deluge, is The ideal travel companion, produces good file if well exposed, and allows a good recovery in PP.rnDifetti I would say besides the fact that it is now "dated" the resistance to iso (above 800 can be seen in video noise, even above 1600 in press), there is no AF micro adjustment, peccato.rnE the "little sister" dx of the D700, then we talk about Nikon made good, no difettino or model changes after a few months, but the bodies that still can have their say, especially if the the photo to search and have artistic ability / nature, then it will never betray you. sent on September 01, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
