JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM : Specifications and Opinions

Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM

The Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2008 to 2015 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 750 €;

69 users have given it an average vote of 8.7 out of 10.

Compare with:

Specifications
Focal lenght	120-400 mm
Angle of view	20.5 - 6.2°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4.5-5.6
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	21 elements in 15 groups
Min. focus distance	1.50 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.24x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal AF	Yes
Full Time MF	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	1640 g
Dimensions	92 x 203 mm
Buy	Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 209000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Timk2

sent on January 26, 2017

Pros: Construction; Stabilisation; Affordability now secondhand; HSM AF fast and quiet; Zoom lock (essential, but can be fiddly and difficult to engage)

Cons: Weight, far too heavy for its specification - the figure given in the Juza spec is 100g less than it really is; AF apparently incompatible with lower end DSLRs; Stabilisation on mine is noisy

Opinion: I'll say this honestly that comparing this lens in all manners to its predecessor, which I had (and mostly hated) the 135-400mm Apo, is like comparing an old Skoda with a Passat, but is still way off the mark of the lens that I will one day buy, Nikon's new G 80-400mm VR. I used to own Nikon's old D 80-400mm with its very basic VR and poor 400mm sharpness but traded it in for exchange for this Sigma's bigger brother, the very popular and transforming 150-500mm OS, which I still have and occasionally still use. Sigma have, of course, replaced that lens with yet another leap forward in every aspect, with the two 150-600mm's. They have not replaced the 120-400mm, however and are unlikely to, everybody wants longer and longer focal lengths, of course. But those lenses (and my 150-500mm) are just too big and heavy to carry around as a general purpose long zoom, whereas the new Nikkor 80-400mm G is around the size and weight of a 70-200mm f2.8, big, yes, massive, no. Even on DX, 400mm is generally too short for birds and wildlife, unless you are in a hide, in which case you probably specialise in wildlife photography and so have a better fixed lens, with the possibility of extending via matched extenders. My friend, who passed on this 120-400mm to me for a modest sum, bought it for birds on his D800, found it too short and far too heavy - and has recently gone to Mirrorless anyway. I use a 400mm for its isolation and compression properties in the landscape, both rural and urban. 25% more telephoto gain over my Tamron SP 70-300mm VC might not seem much but it can make a real difference. However, the Sigma weighs 1kg more than the already quite heavy Tamron 70-300mm VC, yet in partnership with a Nikkor 18-140mm VR and 10-24mm Nikkor, in a rucksack, makes for a weighty but not too uncomfortable way of having the range in 35mm terms, 15-600mm, in just three lenses, all with good to excellent quality on the D7100. As for sharpness, the Sigma 120-400mm is good but nothing much more than that. Often its haze and poor light that seiously degrades image quality and in theory should be similar to the 150-500mm. Amateurs and enthusiasts will like it as you can get some very decent quality if you stop the lens down a bit and use it properly, but professionals will not. But professionals had the same attitude to the 150-500mm, but they could afford Canon L, the new Nikkor or exotic fixed lenses that cost the same as a good used car. I've generally avoided maximum aperture so cannot really say how well it performs at 400mm f5.6 but I guess that images would be usable and when some extra sharpness is added in processing. My Tamron 70-300mm SP would easily beat the Sigma at all focal lengths, even at its maximum of 300mm. I've not really tried at closest focus either. So, I can only recommend if you're after reasonable and affordable quality and price and don't pay very much for one either. Reselling could be a problem in the future too, or at least for a decent price. For me, it's an interim stop gap but unlike that old and awful 135-400mm where I felt that my pictures were rather wasted by the often poor (especially 400mm) image quality, I know that this 120-400mm gets me good results for quite little money, but at 400g more than the new Nikkor 80-400mm, the overriding feeling is it's just a bit too heavy. In many aspects, 7/10 would be the right score but if you consider that it can be bought for £300 (500 Euro?) for a good used example and when compared to the alternatives and for the overall package (you also get a padded case, deep and decent hood, metal tripod collar) with its HSM focusing and effective stabilisation, then I have to award 8/10

Pauloneves555

sent on August 29, 2012

Pros: quality, sharpness, easy to use, compatibility, silent

Cons: quite heavy

Opinion: fantastic lens... still learning how to pull the most out of it but already convinced by its quality and performance... great way to spend 1.000,00€... you will never regret the buy! absolutly fantastic! Even when attacehed to the Canon EF 1.4x converter, still can be operated with manual focus, at F:8 with no wories, sharp enough to get great moon pictures for instance...

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Il Santo

sent on March 02, 2021

Pros: Construction quality - Optical quality - Price of used car.

Cons: Considering the purchase price... Nobody.

Opinion: It is the lens that you do not expect at the price you buy it (obviously in the used). Prices vary depending on the conditions but are worth every single penny paid out. Beautifully built, it looks solid and reassuring. 21 stabilized and corrected lenses apochromatically in 1.8 kg of weight do not make him a "feather" to wear cheerfully around. He deserves respect and attention. He deserves a solid tripod. It deserves the intervention of the photographer who must not just press the shutter button. It deserves focus control and a decent iris (f 8.0). It deserves a good light. If given all this attention, it will return sharp photos with balanced colors, indistinguishable from those made with more "bland" optics. Used on FF Nikon and on Aps-c Fuji a show! I'd buy it back a thousand more times. Super recommended if the range of focals it covers is for you.

Giorgoio

sent on June 06, 2018

Pros: Excellent sharpness and quick autofocus engraving compared with a apochromatic telescope of equal focal length 400 mm I can say that from the photos made with the two instruments do not see the difference and I'm talking about a fixed focal length telescope 70 mm diameter tested on new Orion as excellent brand Hayford so do you!!

Cons: Weight but it's such a serious flaw???

Opinion: For me it is worth a vote of 9 after having tried it for some years now certainly the weight is not small but it is due to the sturdy construction so better ' it goes from if I can better use it on a statin as I do from the camouflage shed for the wildlife photo but it's worth the P Ena ' cause we have a quality optics ' at a balanced price built in a solid and reliable

Rzompa

sent on September 27, 2017

Pros: Handy, reliable, great storage, good sharpness and speed.

Cons: Absent AF limiter now suffers from the project in comparison with the current optical production.

Opinion: I used Sigma for two years, in situations of outdoor sports. I feel satisfied with both the sharpness and the down to the max focal point, as well as the ease of maneuverability. After all, I can say that after many positive reviews I had seen, I wanted to buy it for a challenge and I had to recapture. I recommend it especially to those who do not need extreme speed. Very good.

There are 14 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM

Fabric in the Fields - 2

by Timk2
239 comments, 8649 views [editors pick]

HI RES 24.0 MP

Rough seas on the evening

by Caterina Bruzzone
211 comments, 5120 views [editors pick]

The joys of surfing

by Caterina Bruzzone
176 comments, 4425 views [editors pick]

Aspirations

by Caterina Bruzzone
129 comments, 3132 views

Feeling the wave

by Caterina Bruzzone
161 comments, 2861 views

The colors of the earth

by Caterina Bruzzone
109 comments, 1980 views

David and Goliath

by Caterina Bruzzone
106 comments, 1822 views

Lights in Langa

by Caterina Bruzzone
113 comments, 1567 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Artists of langa

by Caterina Bruzzone
112 comments, 1435 views

Surf and go

by Caterina Bruzzone
86 comments, 1747 views

The Larches on the Lake

by Caterina Bruzzone
102 comments, 1384 views

The resilience of certain flags

by Caterina Bruzzone
113 comments, 1620 views

Kingfisher with river prawn.

by D'ostilio Franco
61 comments, 8868 views

HI RES 11.4 MP

Church house and work

by Caterina Bruzzone
96 comments, 1224 views

This Winter Landscape All Ready for Spring

by Timk2
103 comments, 5941 views

HI RES 21.1 MP

Close encounters...

by Caterina Bruzzone
51 comments, 1388 views

Relaxing on the beach

by Caterina Bruzzone
85 comments, 1040 views

Off Road Biking

by Timk2
74 comments, 1233 views

HI RES 21.1 MP

Escaping the wave

by Caterina Bruzzone
80 comments, 978 views

Autumn Lights

by Caterina Bruzzone
74 comments, 1190 views

The Stag Emerges from the Mists

by Timk2
72 comments, 5938 views

HI RES 18.9 MP

On the crest of the wave

by Caterina Bruzzone
75 comments, 1428 views

Black Redstart (Black redstart) m.

by Silvio Marini
40 comments, 3584 views

A Symmetry in Yellow

by Timk2
58 comments, 3058 views

HI RES 22.8 MP

And I'm going to go!!!!!!

by Caterina Bruzzone
77 comments, 1744 views

Takeoff Swan

by Roberto1977
41 comments, 3786 views

Sunset and (a little) Snow

by Timk2
62 comments, 1661 views

HI RES 23.6 MP

Colorful Langhe

by Caterina Bruzzone
75 comments, 1198 views

Owl .....

by Robibarbè
37 comments, 6063 views

Sweet Awakenings

by Simobati
80 comments, 675 views

HI RES 20.1 MP

The Morning Mists Linger....

by Timk2
51 comments, 1042 views

HI RES 21.9 MP

Vertical Surf

by Caterina Bruzzone
56 comments, 1100 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

A Symmetry in Yellow -2

by Timk2
55 comments, 2447 views

HI RES 20.4 MP

The turning point

by Caterina Bruzzone
39 comments, 767 views

So Bright, So Sunny!

by Timk2
53 comments, 947 views

HI RES 23.0 MP

Four Lanes of Traffic (to get to the sea)

by Timk2
47 comments, 1163 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

The Storm that (Somehow) Missed Me!

by Timk2
52 comments, 1335 views

HI RES 23.8 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sigma » Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM