|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Damiano1988 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Damiano1988  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 Pros: Cost, quality / price ratio, weight, 7-blade Cons: autofocus, sharpness at the corners Opinion: Good lens, in relation to the price ... I wanted to try the fixed focal length 35mm without spending too much and this is right for me. Not much used for now (alas, there is no time), but attached to 6d is perfect, lightweight and not bulky. Outputs for quiet, okay, if used 5.6 af the quality is really good. Mine has a few problems with the exif that are not always recorded. Having paid € 113 on ebay I'm not complaining, though I took the availability Sigma art, but I'm happy. Recommended for those who want to try hard and see if a 35 is congenial as the focus. Find the absolute quality and speed should of course seek elsewhere! sent on May 07, 2016 |
 | AmazonBasics - Zaino per fotocamera e accessori Pros: Price, capacity, size Cons: Non-breathable, rain cover, door hangers tripod Opinion: Exceptional value for money, backpack formidable ONLY photographic outputs (I want to clarify, unless you decide to bring very little equipment, space for other things outside of photographic material is almost non-existent). The hooks for external tripod I found them helpful and functional only when used with their tripod (the one with the ball head overview, for instance) in its casing. In that case it works well, otherwise, with the Manfrotto 190 for example, tend to slip off and get to the bottom of your bag stand in making perhaps banging on the legs. The capacity is excellent, we could try and fit 6d + 70-200 2.8 mounted, 1d mkII, 50 1/8, 24-105 and other 2 m42 lens, remote controls, spare batteries, cards for the WB and other little things. It makes you sweat a lot back, but with the harness, one abdominal and one on the chest, you can manage well the weight. I use it more as a second / third photo backpack, for outputs short and in days when no rain is expected, or maybe just for the curedo mirrorless. Replaced with a Kata 33n1 that, despite having paid six times as much, makes you sweat a lot and you can not make good balance weights. We say that is a great backpack for landscape outputs, less recommended for weddings and portraits (if you often change objectives). Amazon could produce, and maybe sell a part, a rain cover, although with this backpack I took light rain and has not infiltrated, it is best not to risk it! sent on September 07, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto MT 190 X PRO4 Pros: stable, well finished, levers for quick opening Cons: weight, but if you want stability and not gutted ... Opinion: for me a good tripod, and then onwards to the jump cheap tripod is almost abissale.stabile in almost all situations, in those critical to the limits of decency is a bit 'hard work, but you can not expect too much. With 6d and 1d and 70-200 2.8 I did not find any problems, get really wide open at the top, even for me who are more than 1.80 meters ... with his head 496 rc2 but i'm not feeling great, the lever beats often the bg if the machine is 90 ° on the ball, do not turn easily to the pan and the double locking system I find it a bit 'slow. On my cheap amazon in terms of ease of use (everything else is just an abyss below) I was more comfortable, it will only get used to it. However, the only tripod no objection if not a little 'difficult to slide a division of a leg, but I hope it will eventually melt a little' ... sent on November 07, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Weight, cost, scope (yes, I wrote extent ...) Cons: requires broad support and plan to give my best, but it is not a true Opinion: I still had a little time to test it thoroughly, but for my own curiosity, I did some tests of critical flow, like this: rnhttp: //www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php? l = en & t = 6d + bg 1048709rncanon and tamron 70-200 2.8, deliberately attached to the bg to make it more critical the situation is clear ... I use the 190 for the exits, but to always have a tripod behind microscopic, light and sturdy for emergencies, I can not recommend it enough! sent on October 10, 2014 |
 | Canon 1100D Pros: Great entry level, light, raw, battery life Cons: small, plasticky, yield high iso, autofocus Opinion: Coming from the film, was the first digital SLR that I had, so for a while, 'I looked like a monster machine. Over time, you begin to see or limits, autofocus slow and imprecise, taking uncomfortable for me (which I have enormous hands). But all in all I took away the satisfactions, of course I threw away the 18-55 II (however decent lens) and replaced them with a 50 1.8 and everything has changed. It 's simple to understand, even if the results are quite erratic, is full of functions (such as portrait, landscape, etc. ..) in my opinion useless, only attract the mass consumer. You could remove and put some more dedicated key. rnTutto all if you do not have large claims is a nice toy and a good school at an affordable price, then cheaply you can buy one optical most satisfying and fun. Replaced with 6d and 1d mk II, but not sell it for sentimental value. He will remain with all its faults, first love sent on August 26, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
