JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Manfrotto MT 190 X PRO4 is a tripod for mid-size and large cameras, manufactured from 2013. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 261 €;
38 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Good product, I tested it several times in conditions of wind and rain with above professional bodies... Always stable even in wind condition above the cliffs, obviously for particular situations should be loaded... We're not in Miracolandia... Nothing else to say does his dirty work. Only flaw, the box does not contain the bag!
Pros:Robustness, quality components, intuitive and immediate
Cons:Relatively high weight (if considered defect)
Opinion:Manfrotto MT 190 X PRO4 Tripod purchased with head 496RC2; Reliable in many situations, high quality components, great balance in immediate and great intuition in use (30 seconds and ready) .nn As for the weight, being aluminum, is acceptable for the product's high quality. In my humble Amazon backpack, it's comfortable ...
Pros:Versatile and comfortable, good stability with optical "normal."
Cons:Loaded with weights well below the limit stated it is not stable enough. Weight if you move around a long time
Opinion:The stand is very good, well-made and sturdy. With compact equipment (SLR + max 2-300mm) objectives it behaves very well. If you load more with optical impulses it tend to vibrate quite making it less suitable for nature photography. In astronomical photos you can resort to tricks to reduce vibration and thus can also go with pushed canvases. Overall it is a good product.
Pros:Robustness, ergonomic (the rubber sleeves are fantastic), intuitive and easy to open, height at full aperture
Cons:nobody
Opinion:I purchased this tripod combined with the Manfrotto head XPRO-BHQ2, commanded by a famous online store has taken us over a month to arrive ... rnodissea apart when you open it all you realize what is solid! Its strengths are its strength, the removable column (very practical from the predictive mechanism), the handling of block joints to open it. The weight for me is not a problem although I doing explorations and therefore I move much !!! Better a sturdy tripod to rest easy with the assembled machine. The only drawback alas although it is not an intrinsic defect of the tripod is the lack of high profi ... I have done a sewing tailored to 10 euro from a seamstress !!
Opinion:Easel very well done, the weight is not negligible but it is easily transportable. Combined with MHXPRO-3WG Xpro head (head 3-way polymer with precision movements) is perfect for architecture, landscape and macro. Manfrotto has taken care of the details and aesthetics, but has 'forgotten' an indispensable accessory: the carrying bag ... sold separately. I am very pleased with the product and I have a good quality / price ratio.
Cons:Bag sold separately, best to order both before.
Opinion:Just bought found it solid and easy to handle. Unfortunately I had to turn a bit 'to find custody but integrates seamlessly with manfrotto backpacks. Carry it around arm get tired but not nearly in the bag does not feel. The key is convenient to tighten the joints if they were to come loose. Compared with the competition we have the best quality / price ratio. In adverse environmental conditions it is resistant and easy to treat even with thick gloves. Despite rain, snow, mud and lively children it seems like new.
Pros:Solidity, robustness and build quality. Stability.
Cons:Nothing
Opinion:stable in all conditions, built with good materials and well finished. Perhaps a heavy pelino, together with the Manfrotto 496RC2 head weighs 2470 grams (excluding a possible carrying bag). All open permits, to almost 180 cm tall people, to look in the viewfinder without the slightest flex the torso or the head. really an excellent product all over
Opinion:It 's my first tripod, after reading the various reviews here on Juza I matched us the 496RC2 head and I have to say I am very satisfied. rnCerto the carbon version would be on top, but my wife would ask me food! rnPurtroppo missing the bag to transport it, I think I buy more là.rnL'ho text in the mountains on a very disconnected ground and I must say it is very stable, very well hold my D300s with 17/55 f2.8. RNLA clutch is really very useful, allows you to place the camera optimally. Highly recommended!
Opinion:It shows him about 2 months and keeps very well my Nikon D300 + 24-120 f4: a rock! What is certain is that even bringing in her shoulder bag for 5.6 kilometers starting to show a little discomfort, but that's the price you have to pay for some stability. However, if we want at all costs the lightness there is always the carbon model, but obviously the amount payable is double .Straconsigliato! 9/10
Pros:Stability, improved the central hub than the old series.
Cons:Release levers too bulky legs and feet too small.
Opinion:I purchased version 4 sfli aluminum to have less space when folded. I already have a 055 first series only three sections, however, it is impossible to tie the pack because of the length. With 190 to 4 extension, although challenging cmq a tripod, you can tie it to the backpack and to have such a free hand. The use for the D800 usually with wide optical but also with 300 f / 4 mainly for paesaggi.rnNon is a feather but on the other hand in certain situations it is essential to the stability and safety and this stand satisfies the demands even if, as it is obvious that, with all the legs extended and in windy conditions, it loses a bit 'in efficacia.rnMigliorato much the central hub than the first version. Now with the vertical column is much more stable and does not yield. Even with the column at 90 degrees has improved although it is best not to overdo it with weight and estensione.rnOttime and legs a little 'less pins which in my opinion are too small and in sandy soils it resent. Even the levers of releases of the sections I do not knownot liked too .. well, aesthetically beautiful but too bulky and protruding inter alia, the plastic seems a bit 'poor thing ... over time we will see, for now I'm happy with the purchase. That 's what I was looking for my purposes (landscapes in tough situations and not, study and travel without sacrificing stability as a tripod with lighter).
Pros:stable, well finished, levers for quick opening
Cons:weight, but if you want stability and not gutted ...
Opinion:for me a good tripod, and then onwards to the jump cheap tripod is almost abissale.stabile in almost all situations, in those critical to the limits of decency is a bit 'hard work, but you can not expect too much. With 6d and 1d and 70-200 2.8 I did not find any problems, get really wide open at the top, even for me who are more than 1.80 meters ... with his head 496 rc2 but i'm not feeling great, the lever beats often the bg if the machine is 90 ° on the ball, do not turn easily to the pan and the double locking system I find it a bit 'slow. On my cheap amazon in terms of ease of use (everything else is just an abyss below) I was more comfortable, it will only get used to it. However, the only tripod no objection if not a little 'difficult to slide a division of a leg, but I hope it will eventually melt a little' ...
Pros:Robust, compact, column decentrable to 90 °, with the possibility of independent legs greater openness, excellent construction
Cons:weight slightly excessive
Opinion:Recently, with great satisfaction, I purchased the 'MT 190 X PRO4 combined with the 496 RC2 ball head. The impression from the very beginning has been extremely positive, the next use has only confirmed the validity of the long-awaited purchase. Mounted the 7D with 24-70 L, the weight is not negligible, I immediately noticed the great stability of the tripod (light years away from the "chinese chip product" previously purchased), even in rush or inclinations limit testa.rnCi I thought for a long time (maybe too much) and I feel very satisfied!
Opinion:excellent product, which transmits a sense of solidity and stability. the central column adjustable to 90 ° is very useful for macro and viewpoints diversi.rnabbinato an excellent head is a product definitivo.rnutilizzato with d800 and 70 200.rnrnSconsigliato for travel because it's really pesante.rnrn
Opinion:I purchased this excellent model to replace another Manfrotto but not bore the 5/6 kg (God rest his soul). RnDirei really a great tool; the soundness and robustness are its trademark and associated with a good ball head is really great for those like me who are going to mount a maximum of a 5D III over a 70-200.rnContro but is weighted at time of purchase weight, adding that the head is a lot and it makes you feel (I think I will buy one for expeditions in the mountains); it is obvious that the twin carbon eliminates the problem but that I study all the money difference I have not been able to spend ... but really recommended!
Pros:Strength-rn-column decentrabilern-attack for various accessories through easylinkrn-system to put the horizontal column is eccezionalern-made in italy
Cons:Pesantern-quite-final height by open column without raising a little bassarn-I find it difficult to open your legs, even though there has not already from January
Opinion:I bought this to replace a Manfrotto tripod I already had, but definitely lower quality, I've never been disappointed and I used it in tandem with a canon 6d + Canon 70-200 and did not show the slightest harm, coupled with a ball head rnManfrotto MH054M0-Q5, it should be coupled together with a ball head or axes of good quality obviously! I find it very robust, with high quality materials, excellent in supporting the photographic material up to 6kg, coupled with the Sigma 150-500 instead I found it slightly dancer, I use it for macro and landscapes, and I highly recommend it for those genres, while I would advise against it for the birds and photographic safari. In any case, I gave it a 9, because for my needs the best, not because of the weight 10 which together with the ball head in the long run you feel.
Tripods comparison
You can select up to three tripods to compare with Manfrotto MT 190 X PRO4.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
