|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabdimo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fabdimo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: crystal clear already in TA and all focal, beautiful color rendering and fuzzy, well-made, fast AF Cons: does not accept teleconverters on nikon (insert between defects weight is the footprint does not make sense for the type of lens in question) Opinion: I no longer have to set this lens because I did not feel comfortable with this type of lens for the weight and bulk, and I preferred a fixed (Nikon 180mm f2.8). If you are aware of the footprint and weight typical of this type of goals then absolutely I recommend the purchase of the competition. Compared to the Nikon that I got to compare with this I feel better for the Tamron and sharpness equivalent to stabilize colors and blurred, only slightly lower for autofocus (tested on D750). The only flaw is not indifferent to the Nikon is the inability to mount multipliers (only on Nikon bodies) sent on January 20, 2016 |
 | Sigma DP2 Merrill Pros: the sensor output at low ISO spectacular simple controls and free of unnecessary frills, solid construction, excellent optical and despite only 2.8 has a very three-dimensional rendering Cons: Color unusable beyond ISO 400, black and white you can go to 1600 Sw owner postproduction ridiculous. It clips on long exposures reds. Slow autofocus. Slow in saving files, Lack of standard lens hood Opinion: Love and hate. This camera if used properly allows you to get the results of a medium format. I assure you that the details present in the picture is amazing. Unfortunately, the technology used make the sensor used almost only in 200 ISO (100 loses some 'DR) over the results are tragic going on B & N you can still pull something off. The machine is very well built and also the SW interior is essential and to measure photographer (someone said it was a box with a sensor), if you love photography can not but rejoice in discovering that unlike most renowned and expensive cameras (eg . NIKON D750 I possess) of this shortage of sports options, portrait etc. from compact camera. The main drawback of this camera, however, that sometimes makes me want to pull her into a wall, is the need to develop the raw file only by using the SW owner who is slow to die on any PC and install it on one that seems designed by He does not know what the PP. I turned queI'm defect into an advantage, I decided that for me the Merril is a film camera with a 24 frames loaded inside. When I go out with Merril shooting only after studying the shot, I come home with up to 24 photos a day to be developed, otherwise risk ulcer ?. sent on January 20, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 180mm f/2.8 D ED IF Pros: Construction "nikon once" sharpness to TA, good focus, good results for portraits Cons: sincerely considering the cost MMT do not see many in the autofocus "lazy" Obviously it is an objective specialist from portrait does not arise for other uses, and as such should be evaluated Opinion: I nicknamed the 70-200 of the poor, with about 300 € used will bring home a portrait lens that has to envy to 70-200 only the versatility and speed of the autofocus (both aspects are unattractive for a use purely portraiture) but if the play as best as sharpness and color rendition and weight. Definitely a lens that buy back sent on January 20, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: very sharp in the center at all focal lengths even at RT. Also perfect edges to small apertures to f8. Very well built. Saturated colors and beautiful tan for a zoom Cons: TA at the edges are not the best especially 24, it weighs and is cumbersome. You do not pass unnoticed Opinion: And 'one of the objectives I use the most, is not perfect but it is well done and for reportage and portraits is great (except for the space) and I do not regret a drive. Ben diaphragmed says its also in the landscape and is very fast in focus even in low light conditions. on the canvas does very well in portraits boasting a blur really nice unlike other Canon and Tamron 24-70 sent on January 20, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: very sharp in the center at all focal lengths even at RT. Also perfect edges to small apertures to f8. VR effective. Compact and lightweight. Ability to mount screw-on filters. Saturated colors Cons: TA edges are not the best, but by using it almost always small apertures is not an issue for me. I think the main problem is that the flare with the sun in the frame is almost inevitable Opinion: I wrote almost all the Pros and Cons. The buy back for the use that I have to do (landscape and handyman travel) lacking a real alternative in the house in the Nikon range of focal lengths, in fact the brother 14-24 cost more, weigh more, not mounted filters screw and he suffers even more flare the 17-35 I was not convinced as sharpness and color the only time I got to try it. sent on January 20, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
