|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Tortorix www.juzaphoto.com/p/Tortorix  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Extreme clarity and openness Cons: I have not found Opinion: I am one of those who prefer to have in their kit only original objectives (in my case Nikon) and, therefore, I bought this lens with a bit of skepticism, partly because I hear a bit from all that Sigma, often suffer from marked Front / Back focus that can only be solved with the help of dock.rnBene: when I brought it home and I made the micro AF (I do it with all the goals), I was pleased that my copy was " out "very little and then I could fix everything with calibration macchina.rnDetto this, the lens is exceptionally clear: the sharpest I've ever tried, and this clarity, combined with the large opening and the wide angle, can provide great effects pleasant sent on December 02, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: DX format, speed MAF, semi-pro body, held in important values ??iso Cons: It does not have the protective glass on the LCD Opinion: I bought this car six months ago to tile as the second body, to my D800 and I must say that I soddisfatto.rnA I needed for the crop factor of the DX format and then I got it mainly for sports and bird life, but I have to admit that after trying it, I also like to use it in other ambiti.rnDevo say that, compared to the D800, I do not see huge differences in performance at high ISO. In fact I would say that up to 4000 ISO, the D7200 and D800 behave the same way and I was favorably stupito.rnVedo instead of the RAW file of 7200 is much less "workable" than the full frame and this sorry a pochino.rnNel Overall I must say that is a great machine: suitable for use professionale.rnPer amateur use is toprn sent on December 01, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 500mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: This lens has so many that it is difficult to indicate one in particular, but coming from an old 600 mm (the first in the series AF-S), I would say the weight Cons: No one apart from the price, but then it is normal for a "piece" of this caliber has its cost Opinion: Objective purchased about six months ago and I must say it is really great for nature photography and sports in which the photographer can not get too close to the subject (I use it for the bike on the track) .rnE 'already razor-sharp wide open, condition in which gives the Bokeh really eccezionali.rnNonostante size is well balanced, but it must be used with a cavalletto.rnRegge excellently TC 1.4 and, although I do not like multipliers, from time to time, especially for the wildlife, I make some shots in this configurazione.rnChe add: I consider my point of arrival of the super tele and I think that will remain with me for a long time yet. sent on September 23, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 600mm f/4 D ED Pros: Extreme sharpness, F4, 600 mm. Cons: The weight and the absence of the stabilizer Opinion: I bought (used and do not know what year) this light a few days ago after reading Placing in internet.rnAll'inizio I was a little afraid of the age of the lens and the lack of stabilizer, but now, after taking a couple of thousands of photos, I'm really excited because I could not afford to purchase a 600 mm last generation, from "amateur" that I am, this light, gives me the results to say the least sorprendenti.rnLa absence of the stabilizer, in my case it does not feel at all (photographer motorcycles and animals) and the sharpness is really estrema.rnottimo also the fact that it is an F4 and you can duplicate (I bought the whole 1.7X objective). sent on October 09, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Size, focal length, stabilizer Cons: No one in relation to the type of target Opinion: I took this lens with the purpose of use in picnics with family or holidays, but I'm using it more than I thought because it's really eccezionale.rnLa photo quality is not comparable to that produced by a 24/70 or a 70/200, but it is certainly satisfactory for a multitude of situazioni.rnE 'really the ideal lens for traveling leggeri.rnNon I would use it for birds because his bad side comes out between 250 and 300 mm, but everything else is a large lens sent on August 14, 2014 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Sharpness, durability, price Cons: Maf manual Opinion: I've had this lens on the Canon 1D mk4 and now I've bought back for the Nikon D8oo because I think it's a great lens and that we should have in corredo.E 'a lens that is worth all the money it costs and that large satisfaction when looking at the picture a bit particular environments or in action sports. rnDa the best of the full frame sent on August 03, 2014 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Brightness, sharpness stabilization, weather sealing, zoom lock switch Cons: Light vignetting on full frame and slight distortion to the focal child Opinion: Objective great, I had it before on Canon 1D Mk4 and now Nikon D800 D800.rnSulla slightly cartoon (which was not on the 1D due to the 1.3x multiplication factor of the machine), but nothing to worry about and nothing that is not you can correct it in PP with a simple click.rnLa extreme sharpness and brightness are the real strength of this objective sent on August 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon D800 Pros: Sharpness, definition and color range of file Cons: Gust speed Opinion: I went to this machine a month ago after being Canonist for years (1D MK4). RnCon this machine, combined with the beautiful Nikon 80-400, I made a leap into the future of fotografia.rnIo love wildlife and I find that there is no comparison between the photos that I take out from this machine compared to what I was doing with the 1D.rnI files are impressively sharp and allow 36 megapixel crop of discrete foto.rnL 'fly in the ointment, for the avifauna is the flurry of only 5 fps. patience ..: you can not expect the D810 exit tutto.rnOra is that, in addition to the quality of the 800 offers a good burst, but it costs a lot more. sent on July 13, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness, weight, focal length, stabilizer Cons: Only the price, but the quality you pay for Opinion: I got it a month ago and I'm excited: I use it on a D800 and find it exceptionally sharp lens (even at 400 mm) and extremely versatile due to its weight and content all in all its a really great excursion focale.È obiettivo.Peccato for the price, but then, you know: the quality is really useful paga.rnTrovo a plus the fact that it is weather sealed sent on July 13, 2014 |
 | Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: Objective super versatile, very clear and very precise Cons: Weight: I put it on the scale and the needle marks grammi.rnCerto 2100, it is always a lens of up to 500 millimeters, but if it weighed a little less ... Opinion: It 'a lens that really makes me doting, I bought it used to photograph animals and leave the bike at home and in other occasions, but its sharpness often makes me want to use it for other kinds of foto.rné true: there is an F4 or even 2.8, but employing it always outside, I do not feel the need for a brightness maggiore.rnPeccato that weights more than 2 kg, if not, with a few pounds in less, would be a lens that would bring always with me.rnUltra satisfied with the purchase: I do not think I will separate from very early this goal sent on January 10, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
