|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Thomas Farina www.juzaphoto.com/p/ThomasFarina  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | DJI Phantom 3 Standard Pros: cheap, great independence, excellent video quality, excellent stability in flight Cons: wifi very susceptible to interference, sub photo a bit 'little, few physical controls on the radio control Opinion: I own this drone from a little less than a year and we've shot several videos, I brought with me to the Lofoten Islands and made me so much fun. Definitely I recommend it to anyone wishing to experience a drone without spending too much. The video quality is very good and the D-Log profile allows for a very malleable flat files in post production since it is still a compact cam. The quality of the raw photo instead is definitely disappointing, little detail and a lot of noise even at low ISO, not recommended if you want more photo and video then. Excellent battery life that allows you to stay in the air about 25 minutes, I've got two and they are more than enough for most uses. As regards the range depends very much on the conditions, personally I use in open environments so I do not interference problems, in the original configuration are unable to push it to 6-800 meters maximum. I have modified the antennas and I've got to reach 1600 m away, really good considering it is the entry level model. sent on September 07, 2016 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Quality and processability of raw files, made at high ISO, point af central, GPS, size and weight, tropicalization Cons: It tends to underexpose bad, points positioned side af bad and inaccurate, buffer and burst Opinion: I decided to write my review after almost two years and about 30 thousand shots. I used the 6d especially traveling with different objectives that both canon Tamron rather than sigma, but also in many different occasions marginal travel-type ceremonies of friends or sports (volleyball and bikes). Coming from a 500D the jump was really huge and those who say that the photo makes her only the photographer has no idea (or does not want to remember) what it means to take an entry level, a good car will simplify things a lot. rnrnDetto this I must say that as far as the autofocus There are obvious limitations especially with the side and objectives brighter, I got to make some shots with a 5dmark3 and both the comfort of the joystick that the provision and accuracy of the lateral points really makes a difference, but for my use I never had problems (use the excellent central af-on and recompose) being careful not to move troppo.rnrnQuest'anno I finally decided to use the GPS on the go and I say that it is absolutely preferred in order todividuare the various places where it was stopped for 2 shots on the fly, or get back to that beach you do not remember the name; this function well if configured with a refresh time of the medium does not affect most of the 10-15% battery life. I find Tropicalized 6d globally good, we've taken to Niagara Falls and the Marmore really taking a lot of water and I did not have the slightest problem. rnrnCome have already written the other confirm the problems that the exposure tends to underexpose bad even in a rather constant, usually shooting av to +2/3 or check the histogram, but not always possible to solve it on the fly. rn sent on August 22, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Construction, light weight, stability, sharpness Cons: distortion at 16mm Opinion: For me this is 16-35mm optics ideal for almost all kinds and practical (photo of architecture, interiors, landscapes, souvenir photos on the go), I keep pretty much almost always mounted except when I have to take portraits or when I subjects very distant. The stabilizer works very well and helps in low light conditions. sent on August 16, 2015 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: excellent sharpness, good stabilizer, good autofocus Cons: high weight, bokeh onion Opinion: I have used this lens on my canon 6d for about a year with great satisfaction, initially I used it to 17-40 then joined mainly for portraits (ambientati and not) and some landscape where I needed a longer focal length or in situations low light. Then it was with me for a month in the states where I got to use it a lot in the urban landscape at night and also as a handyman walking into town. I found myself really covered very good in almost all situations. The stabilizer is phenomenal and has allowed me to shoot even at 1/4 or 1/8 freehand. I would absolutely recommend. The only negative notes are the weight and the bokeh is not particularly pleasant in some situations, especially at night. sent on January 29, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: price stabilization, autofocus and sharpness Cons: dim Opinion: I purchased the lens in question as tele-rounder for use in landscaping and traveling. I'm definitely satisfied, for me it is a lens 10 and praise especially in relation to the low price of around 300 Euros. The stabilizer is phenomenal and autofocus fast enough, used to f8 diaphragmed gives shots always very clear in my case even at maximum zoom range. Highly recommended for those who like me is a sporadic use of canvas and has no plans to invest large amounts of money. sent on January 16, 2015 |
 | Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM Pros: field angle, color and contrast, very solid construction Cons: inability to mount filters except with holder very expensive, very poor resistance to flare Opinion: Optics in my opinion very difficult to use, but at the same time unique and funny when you guesses the shot right. I used it for about 4 months of 6d. A 12mm perspective distortion is so tricky if you are not perfectly parallel to the ground images deform much, this thing can also be considered an advantage because a distortion creative lets take home shots very interesting, a bit 'as with the fisheye. Reduced instead of the optical distortion. I loved the colors and contrast of this lens, even the sharpness is not poor, at least my copy behaved well diaphragmed f8. Unfortunately I rather hated the very poor resistance to flare even in cities that I have greatly complicated life making me throw several clicks. In any case, the sigma 12-24 remains a lens unique must-try. sent on December 01, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
