JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM : Specifications and Opinions

Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM

The Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2011 to 2018 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 703 €;

85 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.

Specifications
Focal lenght	12-24 mm
Angle of view	122 - 84.1°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4.5 - 5.6
Aperture blades	5
Lenses/Groups	17 elements in 13 groups
Min. focus distance	0.28 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.16x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	No
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters
Lens hood	Built-in
Weather sealing	No
Weight	600 g
Dimensions	87 x 120 mm
Buy
Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM, buy on Ebay

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 228000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Blurryeyed

sent on March 02, 2016

Pros: 12mm Rectilinear Ultrawide, solid build quality, fast focus, low distortion.

Cons: Maximum aperture, border sharpness, inability to accept filters.

Opinion: It is embarrassing to admit that I own three ultra-wides at the moment, of the three I think that this lens is the least sharp but that is not to say that it isn't sharp, the sample images below show that the sharpness of this lens is more than adequate to make wonderful images. The other two lenses being the Canon 16-35 f/4 IS and the Tokina 16-28 f/2.8 are just a bit sharper. The Sigma does things that the others can't because of the 12mm wide focal length, it delivers great photographs and until the Canon 11-24 came out it was the widest rectilinear zoom lens available for full frame cameras. Personally I do not care to spend the money for the Canon 11-24 and based on some of the reviews that I have read about that lens I am not certain that it would be a better performer than the Sigma. Some of the outstanding points about this lens is that color rendering and contrast is very good, and distortion is very well controlled. Distortion is evident at 12mm but by 16mm where most ultrawides are at their widest distortion is minimal. One very big plus for me is that I own both Canon formats, full and crop frames, with this lens in my bag will never feel the need to buy an array of lenses cover both cameras, the wide end of this lens is still plenty wide on my crop frame camera and the lens covers me up to 24mm where my 24-70mm lens pics up. I recommend this lens for those who want to get really really wide or who like me own both formats and don't always carry your full frame camera body.

Sakikh

sent on October 25, 2015

Pros: Center-middle-border resolution, low CA, well bulit.

Cons: The FX corners can not reach too high resolution. Lens cap.

Opinion: Widest rectlinear UWA for Nikon FX. Generally very good image quality. Just the FX corners can not reach too high resolution. Acceptable size, weight and price. I use ND1000 filters often. For me, the size is important. From 15mm, a normal 82mm filter is usable with some DIY modification. A little mistake from the designers. The lens cap can slips down, because do not have any lock. I recommend this lens.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Chefmosco

sent on September 22, 2022

Pros: Angle of view, build quality, low weight (compared to Nikon)

Cons: Quality at the edges (at all focal lengths), sharpness, colorimetry (saturated and warm colors), shot whites (peel the clouds and the whites in zone 10 that do not work in post)

Opinion: I had the beautiful Nikon 12-24DX that I used with APS-C cameras but lately also in FF (with the limitation of the focal length to 17mm otherwise vignetted); so I looked for a real 12-24 and I consider the Nikon too bulky and heavy (I would have taken it used anyway) I chose the SIGMA as I have other optics of the same brand and I like the "paste" and the slightly open shadows (like the old AF-D Nikkor). Arrived home the first thing done was the usual microregulation to correct any front / back focus (this also suffers but little on my bodies). Then a few shots here and there but in particular I filmed a church near the house (which the day before with the Nikon I had photographed just to compare). The first impressions: the paste is that but this optics returns the warmest and "colored" colors but not saturated and in fact does not close the shadows but these instead of being neutral gray is as if a Wratten 81A filter were placed before it. The sharpness, which in landscaping and architecture is usually set between f:8 and f:13 makes each shot "all in focus" but I noticed if at the edges (not only at the corners) there is a noticeable decay and at the lowest focal lengths (12-16) a stretching of the objects outwards; although I think this is normal given the 122 degrees the Nikon that started from 17mm (the 12 in DX is comparable to the 18mm) was less accentuated; I also noticed in those areas that if there are writings you have a doubling of the same (as if you suffered from astigmatism). On the apparent sharpness from the center up to 3/4 of the framed area I can say that the 2 optics are very similar and for my use more than satisfactory. The flare... I had read plague and horns on this optics and so I wanted to take 2 shots with the sun in the open field and barely noticeable on the upper left corner. With the sun in the field you can hardly see ghost and flare and even the image has a nice resolution (in this case better than the Nikon) while if the sun enters from the side but right at the edge, you have the classic reflections however not huge but that I think are normal with an optics of this type. Flag? anything enters the field if we talk about 12-15mm then the problem does not arise. Focus... good, fast and quiet if made from viewfinder; more stunted and uncertain if in Live View but once hooked the subject is perfect. The vignetting at the focal lengths of use I did not notice also because I always work at closed apertures and in any case in ACR or LR the first thing I do is select the optical correction and aberrations. One thing that surprised me instead was the lack of 1/20 freehand f:6.3 move (or if it is present I consider it ridiculous even they look at 100% of the file; it is true that when I shoot at over 1600 ISO I shoot a sequence of 10 shots and then combine them in Photoshop to reduce the noise a lot. As soon as I can I will do a landscape and sunset session to see how it behaves... but already from the appetizer I can say that for 100 euros (the difference between purchase and return and does not even seem to have been used) I made a decent deal. As a vote at the moment I would give an 8.5 but since decimals are not possible, go for an 8.

Claudio.Gi

sent on May 15, 2021

Pros: Build quality, sharpness at all focal points, good color reproduction, minimal distortion, weight and low performance size.

Cons: Coating with poor quality velvety paint and resistance to abrasion.

Opinion: Bought used at a more than acceptable price, I was amazed at the clarifications at all the focal points. I confirm what was written by those who reviewed before me to avoid repetition, with the clarification in the defects, which no one has detected, about the very delicate, absurd, easily broken finish, and rightly so has been eliminated in subsequent models.

Asellerix

sent on October 09, 2020

Pros: It costs little and goes really well, excellent quality of materials

Cons: Maybe not bright. Maybe

Opinion: Then it's a really fun optics that brings so many closer to a creative photo in the FF, given the costs, attention we always talk about the ver. II, and above all unwieldy then to be FF, I read everything... but maybe it is true not mind-blowing at the edges but more than enough, to be superior it takes so much cache. and then the others weigh a lot and after a while you get tired. In its lightness this optics makes very sharp photos and I personally use it between 12 and 18 mm , I have never had problems of dark corners, indeed even at full opening it defends well. I have no doubt from an indomitable admirer of fixed optics a nice 10 and praise to this Sigma.

There are 24 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM

Lake from Val purple

by Lanfranchi Eliana
107 comments, 26017 views [editors pick]

Pod39 rooftop

by Thomas Farina
63 comments, 24872 views [editors pick]

New day sull'Adda

by Roberto Marini
68 comments, 18072 views

The snake !! Sea bridge, Pescara

by Antonina Eccomi
161 comments, 12608 views

Between water and rock

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
32 comments, 10969 views

Sculpted by the sea

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
32 comments, 8428 views

New York - Times Square

by Giosa
46 comments, 14692 views

At the edge of the world - Dedicated to the two of us

by Emmegiu
120 comments, 5908 views

HI RES 4.5 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Primordial beach

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
35 comments, 7736 views

The last sun before the storm

by Emmegiu
86 comments, 2190 views

HI RES 8.2 MP

Vsta Piz de Mucia

by Rudy Jorg
35 comments, 7478 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

I jump at Paranal

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
24 comments, 7426 views

AcquaAlta Bookcase

by Carlo Bassi
93 comments, 1283 views

HI RES 5.7 MP

Sunrise at Vela

by Micheleambrosini
53 comments, 5088 views

New York

by Giosa
27 comments, 9667 views

Tonight at dusk-dedicated to

by Emmegiu
90 comments, 3047 views

HI RES 4.5 MP

Mistral burrasca

by Emmegiu
72 comments, 1961 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Locomotive sweeper

by Mau1948
55 comments, 3925 views

HI RES 14.8 MP

Blue San Marco

by Saroukai
37 comments, 6610 views

Ghosts

by Emmegiu
80 comments, 2986 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Before the storm

by Emmegiu
61 comments, 866 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

One step from heaven ..

by Scorpi1972
113 comments, 12415 views

Alba Varigotti, Bay of buckwheat

by Giorgio48
29 comments, 11990 views

Street performers on Christmas time

by Peppe Cancellieri
96 comments, 3776 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

The baroque rooms of the ducal palace of Sassuolo

by Carlo Bassi
76 comments, 953 views

Cavour Church of San Lorenzo

by Dantes
86 comments, 4256 views

HI RES 7.5 MP

New York - Ground Zero

by Giosa
15 comments, 6895 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Milan-Piazza Gae Aulenti: point of view!

by Giosa
32 comments, 7457 views

Mantua - Courtyard of the Show

by Scorpi1972
101 comments, 9399 views

.._-_ ..

by Maurizio Mazzanti
40 comments, 3855 views

Autumn sunset on the Tre cime Lavaredo

by Diego.armando.parafango
55 comments, 1241 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Mantua - the courtyard of the show

by Scorpi1972
86 comments, 6597 views

Church of christ

by Thomas Farina
25 comments, 7861 views

Sea bridge

by Antonina Eccomi
43 comments, 4692 views

HI RES 11.4 MP

Venice by night

by Marco50
127 comments, 6102 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Ponte Gobbo, Bobbio (PC)

by Roberto Marini
27 comments, 7468 views

Gorge River alento

by Giancarlo Vetrone
53 comments, 781 views

HI RES 11.5 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sigma » Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM

Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM