RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Filippo37
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Filippo37



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Filippo37


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

tamron_70-300vcTamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD

Pros: cost, fast AF (not very fast), excellent stabilizer

Cons: Construction a little light, slight sharpening to 300mm

Opinion: This zoom was the first optics I bought after the lens kit of my old Canon Entry Level and I still own it, and I'm quite happy with it. Why? For the really effective stabilizer, the USD focus is fine, it's not mind-blowing, but it's honest, you can also make sports shots without major problems. It has a slight drop in sharpness to 300mm but, in my case not a painful thing, still solvable in part closing by 2/3 or 1 diaphragm stop. I've been thinking for a long time that I'll change it to the 70-200 f4 is and multiplier 1.4, but I would definitely lose it in size, affecting the fact that I can keep it in the backpack almost always. I've heard that it's a bit of a vacuum cleaner, but I haven't encountered this problem, despite having used it several times on motocross tracks in the summer you don't notice any dust inside or in the photos. For me, if you're looking for a zoom a little unpretentious handyman from Canon L series goes well

sent on April 18, 2020


canon_efs_10-22Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Pros: Light, sturdy, good range of focals, quite luminiso, ability to mount filters

Cons: Sharpness at the edges at the low focals, fairly pronounced aberrations

Opinion: I've been using this lens before the 2000D for a while and now on the 7D mkII, in general I like it, it is versatile to be a wide-angle and at the same time practical, not being neither heavy nor very bulky though.... there's a though. That is, it has a slightly swinging yield, but generally from its worst to 10mm at the edges, they are very soft, not to mention the angles that really make so much pain they are soft that seem moved. But it's to say that you just go up a few mm of focal point and it's better. I recently purchased a 6D as a second body and will probably soon put it up for sale to replace it with the 17-40 to use on 6D. Frankly, I have heard many conflicting opinions about the rendering of this lens and I think that the build quality of this lens is not very constant, or that there is some criticism within it that comes out easily and creates the problems I report. In any case however I did not regret my purchase, because well or badly his work does, knowing the yield he has at 10mm just put a little attention and maybe add a little vignette in the corners so as to divert the look from those 4 points.

sent on April 18, 2020


canon_40Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM

Pros: Pocket, excellent optical quality, flare resistance

Cons: I don't know... maybe a little bit of vignette and the AF a little slow

Opinion: I find this lens really brilliant, it's really tiny to be a FF lens, mounted on 6D protruding a few mm from the handle. I also like the focal point, which, let's face it, is very close to a 35. I find that for the price it has is absolutely a best buy to turn your reflex into a compact FF of high quality, maybe to carry with you without commitment when leaving home. I pair it with both 6D and 7D mk II, but I think on FF it's just his death. I also used it for some set portraits and it behaves very well, it has a really very reduced distortion. As mentioned by others the AF is a bit slow, but nothing terrible and anyway I think that for the focus that it has is not a big problem, since with a 40mm you make mostly static shots. If you are looking for an optics for street or at least to travel around the city without obligation you have found it. In my opinion if you are going to use it only on aps-c it is better to orient yourself on the EF-S 24 pancake, which turns out to be a 40mm on FF.

sent on April 18, 2020


canon_7d_mark2Canon 7D Mark II

Pros: Pro body, burst, AF, customization possibilities and very wide settings,great LV with dual pixel

Cons: Battery life a little poor, image quality at high ISO

Opinion: I've been sifting through this reflex from top to bottom over the last few months, at body/grip level it's really great, nothing even see with the series 6, which I own. The menus are very complete and relatively simple, you can customize pretty much everything to your liking, both in terms of functions and keys. The AF on moving subjects is good, great, maybe not mind-blowing nowadays with some ML doing better, but at other prices. I had a couple of chances to test it relatively on Motocross and drift cars, trackside, so AF difficulties at high levels and performed very well. Of course you have to learn a little to use it and to "help" it in complicated situations, you can not expect that photographing "ad cazzum" you get excellent results. I noticed that, under specific conditions, it is very very important to find the right CASE of the AF to have good results. If you sect it all well, it's a great satisfaction. The gust is really extreme, in some cases even excessive if set to the maximum (10 fps), but you can rest easy, the menu gives you the ability to set the fps to your liking both on H(fast) burst, on normal burst and even on silent burst, so you can set 3 different values and quickly choose what you need at the moment without switching from the menus all the time. The blackout in the 10fps burst is not bad, you manage well to follow the subject, even better if you set the burst around 8fps. At the level of image quality I am satisfied in half, as far as colors is really good but as detail and sharpness image in general with long focals is fine, but I noticed that shooting at times of about 1/80 or 1/100 with a 50mm you often get micromosse images, it resolves easily raising the times to at least three times the focal. I think it's because of the vibrations in the mirror. This problem decreases as the focal lengths increase, so with a 200mm you don't need to shoot at 1/600 but just 1/400, which is twice the focal point, as on every aps-c. As for noise, I think it's good until 3200 ISO, 6400 ISO depends on light conditions, but they start to be a bit problematic. I l sight... a joy! Apart from the fact that at a 100% coverage and it is 1x, that the points of AF are pop-up and you can set whether to display them all or only those in use, if after you have made the af make them disappear or make them remain active, if you make them light up red etc etc in the crosshairs you can set a lot of functions, for example the level, miscellaneous alerts, display the mode in which you are shooting, display if we are in One Shot or Ai-servo, if you have active burst or single shot etc etc The Live View is a strong point of this machine, has a very good AF that recognizes the faces and follows them, it is almost as fast as the focus in the focus mode. The click noise is discreet, not too loud, if you set the silent shot becomes very very quiet, even if the blackout in both single shot and silent burst increases a lot and to me from a little bother especially in the burst. Overall I find it a great reflex with regard to the side of use experience (grip, feeling, customizations, viewfinder etc),as image quality still remains an APS-C, although high level, so it will not have that cleaning and image engraving that have the FF. I also own a 6D and I think that the two machines are completely complementary, indeed, I highly recommend this pairing, so you can have two bodies, one oriented more dynamic jerky, with factor of crop 1.6x and powerful burst and the other more for static shots but with more image quality and with definitely higher iso tightness.

sent on April 18, 2020


canon_6dCanon 6D

Pros: FF, shredded used prices, tropicalized, robust, IQ, good battery life

Cons: Maybe 1/4000 (but on the other hand it has ISO50), uncomfortable PDC preview button, WB car a little uncertain

Opinion: I bought a 6D used in February 2020 as a second body, I also have a 7D mkII. What to say, as much as I paid it(400euro with 40stm, 40k shots) it's a crime to complain. The body is sturdy, not very big, but it holds very well, it is not at the levels of the 7D as grip, but it is still great, bad only for the door of the SD that is not very solid and holding it feels, but maybe it is just my a little worn. The menus are clear and easy as usual of the Canon, the interface is the usual of both my old entry-level and the 7D, integrates perfectly with the Eos system of Canon, shares the LP-E6 battery with a lot of models, including also the 7D mkII and the 5D mkIII. The IQ is really excellent, the colors are very beautiful, the images very sharp and defined if you use good optics. In my opinion 20MPX are great because it allows you to have light files and well-engraved images, sharp, clean and at the same time few MPXs help to keep the noise low. I found that the high iso seal varies a lot depending on the light present, for example in poorly lit interiors suffers a little, while it suffers much less if you are outdoors and maybe you need very fast times and a diafr. quite closed, there it does much better, coming to 6400 iso the noise is really very little. The viewfinder is not a big disaster, the AF works well if you use the center, the external points are not a great deal, but for the use that I have to make, that is, mostly static photos (for the action I have 7D) is absolutely not a problem to recompose a little. To do this it is very convenient to use the AF on the back button "AF-ON" so that you do not have to hold down the shutter button in half to recompose. In LV does not fare very well, the AF is very slow and uncertain, much better to focus manually at that point, if you are using the tripods. The only real flaw I found at this body is the PDC preview button, it's tiny and in a completely wrong position! In 7D the usual key is at least 5 times larger (not joke) and put a little more on so that you get there very easily even with the ring finger, on the 6D you have to use the other hand otherwise you do not press it! If you're looking for a body that's a bit of a handyman for more static genres, take it now. If you also do sports and other dynamic genres maybe it is not suitable for you.

sent on March 24, 2020


manfrotto_pixi_evoManfrotto Pixi EVO

Pros: Portable, versatile, cheap

Cons: Not very stable, but you could imagine

Opinion: I have this little easel for several months now, I have used it on several occasions, it does not go wrong, but do not think it is a monster of stability! With the 7d 2 and a 24-105L holds, but you definitely need the 10s self-timer and that there is no wind, otherwise you are fried. It still has its own why , I used it in places where I would never have dreamed of opening the real tripod and sometimes allows you to have unusual shots (very low). The main value is that being so small you can always keep it in your bag/backpack and then have it on occasions when the tripod dreams of it. In my opinion it is to have, but as a permelent object in the backpack, not as a substitute for the real tripod (even small). That is to use it when you can not open or have the real one!

sent on February 23, 2020


sandisk_extreme_pro_sdxc64gb_170mbs

Pros: Write and read speed, really low priceReliability and Sandisk quality

Cons: Nothing, I don't know how they sell it to so little

Opinion: I recently took one of these tabs for the 7D mk2 and it goes great, the buffer empties in a few seconds and never impales. For the price at which I bought it on Amazon is really a top product. The card is excellently crafted, you can also see it from the box. I don't know how it can cost so little compared to his abilities. 20th for a fast 64gb is really great I know there are superior but my 7d 2 nn supports them, so.... Highly recommended

sent on February 21, 2020


canon_2000dCanon 2000D

Pros: Lightness, photo quality (low Iso), price

Cons: Yield by lifting the Iso, Plasticosa, Kit lens

Opinion: I have been using this entry level for almost a year to get closer to photography. For the cost that has you can not complain much, it works all right even the WiFi. Obviously being a super entry level is wicked and a little light, but it can also be an advantage. The limits of this room are very fast if you engage in photography with low light, or in dynamic shots like sports photos and missing all those functions that are small but are comfortable (eg mirror lift, silent shooting, auto range ISO). Also I find it to be quite noisy shooting, sometimes it bothers by how noisy it is. The gust makes a little laugh, as well as the 18-55 kit lens. All in all if you want to start and you do not have big claims, with little expense you have a body that well or badly allows you to make quality shots when paired with decent lenses. It's all about the price of the new.

sent on May 28, 2019




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me