RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Francesco Daniele
www.juzaphoto.com/p/FrancescoDaniele



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Francesco Daniele


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

fujifilm_x-t2Fujifilm X-T2

Pros: Electronic viewfinder

Cons: High non-optical third party ISOs, prices

Opinion: Was my first ML, as opposed to before the without mirror, l I have taken to enter the world ML, the approach was good, I liked the electronic viewfinder really well defined.. The AF pretty good, the JPEG's with the noise reduction are too mixed up, setting it to 0 improves., and here's the sore note, the high ISO several praise this thing, but not everyone knows that, Fuji has an ISO calibration other than the other houses, example: 2500 ISO Nikon Equivalent to Fuji 6400, I did the tests also by mounting the same optics first on Nikon then on Fuji with Ring.. Well the difference in ISO is over one stop.. But I think it is normal considering it is an APSC, you can not get performance from FX. I find the high prices to be APSC, see xh1 that has now fallen a lot in less than 1 year (maybe because it was a flop?) Even the policy Fuji I do not like, OK we do not do FX, but why do they exit machines of lower category, even in the lapse of little time, which all have the same quality? The H1 that has the stabilization on the sensor, for the rest has the same quality D image of XT2 xt20 Xe3 Xpro2., if I buy a flagship like the xh1 I think it should stand out from the rest.. Instead with a cheap xt20 I could get the same quality as an H1.. Which is indeed a flagship bhà.. Another thing Fuji is a niche product, has no third party optics, the optics that make some are of great quality as the 56 1.2 I love so much or 23 1.4, others do not taste just like the 27 2.8., then why not entrust the production of some optics Also To third parties? Since someone already does it on Amazon there are optics with Fuji attack produced by several companies but only in manual focus., also has many small and almost invisible pros allow you to work well on styles such as Reportage La Street, I love the aesthetics remind me tant Or the old film machines with manual ring nuts, shooting with Fuji is exciting, but if you want quality for me you have to bet on FX

sent on April 01, 2019


nikon_d3Nikon D3

Pros: Professional top quality

Cons: LW is worth

Opinion: I took the D3 years ago to use it as a third body, well it was over to become the first.. An exceptional SLR a jewel of the house Nikon, the sensor of 12 mpx I think is magic color and churn colors unique.. This machine types arrive at 800,000 shots without any problems were built with criterion.. The AF still today hooks up that is a beauty even in little light, and if we put that the car was released in 2007 well the thing puzzles me on the current machines.. The high ISO are a marvel at the shooting at 4500 ISO without any problems.. Besides it starts to lose.. Large ergonomic massive battery inexhaustible (never used the second battery), unfortunately the only key sore is the LW really hideous, but at the time I think it was the maximum today is at ridiculous prices, take it and you will not regret

sent on April 01, 2019


nikon_d750Nikon D750

Pros: AF High ISO quality files

Cons: Missing 1/8000 and AF button on

Opinion: Great machine, I replaced the d800 at the time with the 750, no matter how big the D800, I would never have gotten rid of it if it wasn't that high ISO was too noisy.. If then we put that the car was costing on 3000 euros just exit.. All that noise could not be accepted for a machine like that, passed to the D750 I found many points in favor in addition to a high ISO yield really good, AF significantly better than the D800 and a greater reactivity of the machine The 750 is a machine that gave me And it continues to give me great satisfactions, also excellent mechanics, missing 1/8000 as time, many say that it is not necessary, well if you shoot during the day and look for special effects at Open diaphragms and with the Flash in HSS serves.. Absence of the AF button on, which you can reprogram but go to lose that of the exposure block. Are the flaws that surely will not take much to a really beautiful SLR one of the best products of Nikon

sent on April 01, 2019


sigma_70-200osSigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM

Pros: Excellent Quick sharp Stabilizer

Cons: Not having it, undervalued optics

Opinion: Excellent optics, for sure underestimated and snubled by many, l I found very good great sharpness great blurred MAF fast and really effective stabilizer. Excellent The fact that the stabiliser allows to stabilize both vertically and horizontally, weighs a little bit but slowly it makes us the habit combined with the machine body with grip is balanced optimally recommended

sent on March 30, 2019


tamron_24-70_f2-8vcTamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

Pros: Blurred sharpness to onion

Cons: MAF not really a lightning, rubber ring

Opinion: I have used this optics in different services, the sharpness that pulls out is impressive as the Nikon, if not higher.. The stabilizer works well even if with quick shots it is better to put it on off, the tires of the ring nuts come off easily., take it into account the MAF is not lightning but it is quite fast then it depends on which machine you mount it. Recommended

sent on March 30, 2019


nikon_d800Nikon D800

Pros: Low ISO from fear

Cons: Slow machine, AF every now and then dancer too loud at high ISO

Opinion: A monster!! I had the D800 years ago, well at low ISO generates files that are a pleasure as long as you use resolute optics, it is difficult to find optics that fully solve all mpx of the D800, I used it with fixed such as 105 Nikon 85, 50 the micro-blur is a rumor , come out if you don't know how to use it, it is a machine that does not forgive., l I found it slow in operation, MAF good but not excellent, removed only because the noise at high ISO was really too much, if we consider that the car was costing on 3000 euros when output bhè... Would I buy it back? Yes but definitely the E version, which generates pariah files to that of the 810

sent on March 29, 2019




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me