|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Francesco Daniele www.juzaphoto.com/p/FrancescoDaniele ![]() |
![]() | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: Electronic viewfinder Cons: High non-optical third party ISOs, prices Opinion: Was my first ML, as opposed to before the without mirror, l I have taken to enter the world ML, the approach was good, I liked the electronic viewfinder really well defined.. The AF pretty good, the JPEG's with the noise reduction are too mixed up, setting it to 0 improves., and here's the sore note, the high ISO several praise this thing, but not everyone knows that, Fuji has an ISO calibration other than the other houses, example: 2500 ISO Nikon Equivalent to Fuji 6400, I did the tests also by mounting the same optics first on Nikon then on Fuji with Ring.. Well the difference in ISO is over one stop.. But I think it is normal considering it is an APSC, you can not get performance from FX. I find the high prices to be APSC, see xh1 that has now fallen a lot in less than 1 year (maybe because it was a flop?) Even the policy Fuji I do not like, OK we do not do FX, but why do they exit machines of lower category, even in the lapse of little time, which all have the same quality? The H1 that has the stabilization on the sensor, for the rest has the same quality D image of XT2 xt20 Xe3 Xpro2., if I buy a flagship like the xh1 I think it should stand out from the rest.. Instead with a cheap xt20 I could get the same quality as an H1.. Which is indeed a flagship bhà.. Another thing Fuji is a niche product, has no third party optics, the optics that make some are of great quality as the 56 1.2 I love so much or 23 1.4, others do not taste just like the 27 2.8., then why not entrust the production of some optics Also To third parties? Since someone already does it on Amazon there are optics with Fuji attack produced by several companies but only in manual focus., also has many small and almost invisible pros allow you to work well on styles such as Reportage La Street, I love the aesthetics remind me tant Or the old film machines with manual ring nuts, shooting with Fuji is exciting, but if you want quality for me you have to bet on FX sent on April 01, 2019 |
![]() | Nikon D3 Pros: Professional top quality Cons: LW is worth Opinion: I took the D3 years ago to use it as a third body, well it was over to become the first.. An exceptional SLR a jewel of the house Nikon, the sensor of 12 mpx I think is magic color and churn colors unique.. This machine types arrive at 800,000 shots without any problems were built with criterion.. The AF still today hooks up that is a beauty even in little light, and if we put that the car was released in 2007 well the thing puzzles me on the current machines.. The high ISO are a marvel at the shooting at 4500 ISO without any problems.. Besides it starts to lose.. Large ergonomic massive battery inexhaustible (never used the second battery), unfortunately the only key sore is the LW really hideous, but at the time I think it was the maximum today is at ridiculous prices, take it and you will not regret sent on April 01, 2019 |
![]() | Nikon D750 Pros: AF High ISO quality files Cons: Missing 1/8000 and AF button on Opinion: Great machine, I replaced the d800 at the time with the 750, no matter how big the D800, I would never have gotten rid of it if it wasn't that high ISO was too noisy.. If then we put that the car was costing on 3000 euros just exit.. All that noise could not be accepted for a machine like that, passed to the D750 I found many points in favor in addition to a high ISO yield really good, AF significantly better than the D800 and a greater reactivity of the machine The 750 is a machine that gave me And it continues to give me great satisfactions, also excellent mechanics, missing 1/8000 as time, many say that it is not necessary, well if you shoot during the day and look for special effects at Open diaphragms and with the Flash in HSS serves.. Absence of the AF button on, which you can reprogram but go to lose that of the exposure block. Are the flaws that surely will not take much to a really beautiful SLR one of the best products of Nikon sent on April 01, 2019 |
![]() | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Excellent Quick sharp Stabilizer Cons: Not having it, undervalued optics Opinion: Excellent optics, for sure underestimated and snubled by many, l I found very good great sharpness great blurred MAF fast and really effective stabilizer. Excellent The fact that the stabiliser allows to stabilize both vertically and horizontally, weighs a little bit but slowly it makes us the habit combined with the machine body with grip is balanced optimally recommended sent on March 30, 2019 |
![]() | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Blurred sharpness to onion Cons: MAF not really a lightning, rubber ring Opinion: I have used this optics in different services, the sharpness that pulls out is impressive as the Nikon, if not higher.. The stabilizer works well even if with quick shots it is better to put it on off, the tires of the ring nuts come off easily., take it into account the MAF is not lightning but it is quite fast then it depends on which machine you mount it. Recommended sent on March 30, 2019 |
![]() | Nikon D800 Pros: Low ISO from fear Cons: Slow machine, AF every now and then dancer too loud at high ISO Opinion: A monster!! I had the D800 years ago, well at low ISO generates files that are a pleasure as long as you use resolute optics, it is difficult to find optics that fully solve all mpx of the D800, I used it with fixed such as 105 Nikon 85, 50 the micro-blur is a rumor , come out if you don't know how to use it, it is a machine that does not forgive., l I found it slow in operation, MAF good but not excellent, removed only because the noise at high ISO was really too much, if we consider that the car was costing on 3000 euros when output bhè... Would I buy it back? Yes but definitely the E version, which generates pariah files to that of the 810 sent on March 29, 2019 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me