|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mauro57 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mauro57  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS M200 Pros: Lightness, mentions, functionality and ease of use, image quality. Cons: for now nothing Opinion: Purchased as a gift for my daughter, newbies to photography I liked the functions and quality of the images and I bought one for me, I specified that I have two full frame SLRs. The standard supplied lens is lightweight and versatile but naturally low quality, if you have the EF - M adapter ring you can use much higher quality lenses with excellent results for the price of the camera, tried with 50 1.4 28/70 2.8L and 70/200 2.8L the machine disappears but churns out excellent photos, at the level of a medium quality APS C reflex. I highly recommend it as a first approach to photography or as a second body when you want to travel very light. excellent exposure, good focus, excellent grain up to 1600 Asa, sufficent up to 6400 Asa, I do not recommend using it with greater sensitivity. great value for functionality, picture quality and price. sent on December 29, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Good construction, excellent sharpness up to short focal 70 / 80mm, used price. Cons: slight loss of sharpness at focal lengths exceeding 80mm Opinion: Good construction, excellent sharpness up to focal 80 then becomes a bit soft, I used it in the 5d Mk1 and gave me a lot of satisfaction excellent color quality no distortion and vignetting even at full aperture, a lens that in relation to the price of ' Today's used is definitely worth buying for both ff and aps, rating 9.3 in my opinion! sent on December 14, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: all Cons: to want to be fuss-free the weight and the minimum focusing distance of 1.5mt. Opinion: I took a lot of photos with this magnificent goal, I do not think that at the time of his release there was nothing better and still has history, beautiful portraits, brilliant softness and sharpness, wonderful tonality, quick focus, fantastic boken, an object that only pleases you to hold it in hand then when you see the shots it's pure libido! To find a limit in my opinion the minimum focusing distance of 1.5mt, I would have preferred a higher magnifier ratio especially when photographing interns, especially ceremonies. An advice! if you find it a good buy it too because today you buy it at acceptable prices for the item, it seems to have paid me in £ over 2 million! vote 9.9 only for the minimum focusing distance. sent on November 16, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: All! if weight is not taken into account, but you can not have it all! Cons: Nothing, for wanting to be fuss-free the weight and the minimum focusing distance of 1.5mt Opinion: I missed the excuse, I wanted to review the 70/200 L first series "I took a lot of photos with this magnificent goal, I do not think that at the time of its release there has been nothing better and even today it has history, beautiful portraits, softness and sharpness excelent, wonderful tonal rendering, quick focus, an object that only pleases you to keep it in hand then when you see the shots it is pure libido! To find a limit in my opinion the minimum focusing distance of 1, 5mt, I preferred a larger zoom ratio especially when you make photos in interiors, especially ceremonies. A tip! If you find it a good buy it too because today you buy it at acceptable prices for the item, it seems to have paid me in £ on 4 million! Vote 9.9 only for the minimum focusing distance. "I would delete the review but it does not make me, sigh! sent on November 16, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Pros: construction, chromatic rendering, distortion Cons: slight loss of sharpness and vignetting at the extreme corners only with full frame Opinion: Great focal length of 20mm, it allows a little bit of detail to frame virtually everything without distortion, this particular that I use for a long time returns a chromatic tonality in the wonderful interior, good focus with center point on both 5D old and 6D, excellent sharpness in the middle and discreet on the edges, it only smacks a slight vignetting and sharpening but only in the extreme corners with full frame. sent on November 16, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 28-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Constructive quality, sharpness, speed of focus, good focal excursion, no excess, Splendid bokeh. Cons: Slight loss of sharpness up to diaphragm 4, lack of spare parts, weight. Opinion: An inescapable handyman-friendly design goal. with loose, saturated, well contrasted colors, it returns a very nice blur and sharpness at all the best focal points diaphragming a bit, I've been able to compare it with the 24/70 I and in my opinion it is slightly better even if it does not reach 24mm I do not feel the pain of the pain because there is no risk of distortion and eberration of the image with a 28 that is practically everything.rnProved both on old eos5D that on eos 6D diaphragm on 4 returns magnificent images! rnConsiglible if paid the right today under £ 400 if in good condition it is the best purchase for a standard zoom Canon.rnvoto 9.5 only for a slight lack of clarity up to f4 otherwise 10 sent on November 16, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm FinePix HS30EXR Pros: Construction, controls, optics with very wide excursion, focusing on white balance bright colors. Cons: Sensitive too granular and low noisy pixels even with low iso, not suitable for enlargements beyond 20/30, would have been better pushed than the 16Mpx but cleaner. Opinion: I have chosen for the great impression of the controls and many adjustments and practically you can choose any type of shot, the manual zoom that reminds me of the reflexes, the first impression is a well-constructed and structured machine for those coming from photography analog and has two excellent digital full frame.rnil canon in the house is optimum precise focus, all ok until we get to the sensor that I was disappointed with the ugly grit which also has low iso, I preferred less pixels but cleaner , sin! nice to carry around, handyman I made some photos in different holidays but I would expect something better from the sensor yield, again! rnConvenient for those who do not have high quality expectations but want to take pictures in any situation, 24/720 it allows! sent on November 15, 2017 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Good construction, lightness, excellent controls and infinite adjustment options, kept to high ISO excellent, today's best used price for performance, wi-fi and gps. Cons: Multi-zone autofocus not optimal, I loved the glittering 5D tones, and this is slightly over-contrasting and tending to bluish but easily adjusts Opinion: Purchased used for about a week to cover it with my 5OLD I will never sell, just got me disappointed, too cluttered and tending to bluish, not suitable for portraiture, at this point comparing the files obtained with those of the 5old I proceeded to adjust both the contrast and the tonality, after numerous small adjustments under variable light conditions, I significantly re-evaluated the machine, which is very handy, lightweight, even if taking the 5th feels it is of another category. the car is definitely holding up to the big iso, a beautiful light grain up to 6400Iso, similar to that of the old 1000as films I was fond of.rn i like to use the central focus and recompose the image and i have to say it's fine, the focal point focuses in any light condition very fast, I have to say that I have all optics with diaphragm 2.8 or lower, do not know how to go with it ive less luminous but I think well. rNon fit for sporting photography due to slow and inaccurate focussidebars, although you can try jumping a bit and using the central one.rn I strongly recommend that anyone who has never tried a full frame that I will never give up is, in my opinion, the best price / performance ratio in the used, I prefer it considerably compared to the 5 MKII that I've had to try and did not satisfy me for the color rendering. Voting 9.5 sent on November 15, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: rendering of colors and shadows, rendered untroubled by reference to many of the latest generation machines Cons: apart from the mirror that got off the seat after a thousand shots nothing for the era when there was still no fine focus adjustment. Opinion: I bought this wonderful car in 2005 just out and I still have it, apart from a problem with the mirror that got off the seat never gave me problems, perfect exposure, made of lights and opening of the shadows, outstanding 'embedded that I take as reference to optimize many newer machines.rnThe file rendering and the grain is soft and pleasant up to 1600 iso but it is advisable not to exceed 800, however great for the era.rn this wonderful car is still much more nice to hold in hand compared to the 6D I have bought I've had to compare it, certainly has less clarity when magnifying accents, but for the rest it's still a wonderful car! rnWhat do I say if I found it in excellent condition I would recommend it as first switch to the full frame which in my opinion does not compare to the smaller formats since it is at prices ripped 300/400 €, I remember paying it 2450 . sent on November 14, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
