JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1992 to 2000 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (micro-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is €;
16 users have given it an average vote of 8.9 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 221000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Lightness, extreme compactness, good construction, exceptional focal coverage, excellent optical performance in relation to the price (of the used, of course).
Cons:Yield at the corners quite poor even at the most closed diaphragm.
Opinion:Purchased used for a soothing, and combined with the 20-35 f3.5/4.5 to be used on FF, it has replaced the 24-105 L IS worthily, if only for the weight and footprint irrelevant to the latter, thus extending to 20 mm the availability of focal points with an exceptional portability compared to the various 17-40, 16-35, 24-70 L series, as well as a cost that does not make you feel breathless in case of shocks or falls. With this combination I found the taste of always prune with me photographic equipment, a habit that I had now abandoned due to weights and dimensions. From the point of view of the showdown, after comparisons made against the 24-105 STM, I have noticed that it gives way compared to the latter on the short focal points, I would say up to 35, while otre definitely goes to balance the books, up to 105 mm where understanding who has the best is really very hard. The yield in the colors is decidedly different, very hot in the old man while, in comparison, the yield of the STM is "glacial", which I personally prefer. If I had to make the assessment in a number I would say 8.5.
Pros:Extreme lightness, sharpness on FF, important opening
Cons:lack of stabilization (I think not to overlap with 28-135)
Opinion:Small, light, bright, inexpensive in used, tourist all-rounder to pair with the wonderful sensor of the 6D mk1. The first lens I bought, designed for the film, before I even got the 30D, and then we talk about pretty much three lustres ago. Knowing the purpose, certainly not pro, never disappointed me. Suitable for outdoor photos to monuments, architectures (to be straightened obviously with Cameraraw, but at the cost of a loss of sharpness) and walks maybe in the woods, as per gallery (Campaign, in my profile), looking for details that need good behavior at high iso rather than many megapixels. Less recommended on APS-C, where it becomes a strange telezoom from an almost normal minimum to a maximum just over 160mm. Paired with macro rings, such as Kenko, it has an honest AF for the years it boasts. A fairly common goal, it costs less to buy it back than to look for any third-party assistance to regenerate it. Does he number in a lens collection? No, because sooner or later everyone who owns it wants to go out and use it. The Nikon 28-85 is more voluminous and short, with the same min max opening, but it is also a good alternative. Will it be the concept?
Pros:Construction, maf, colors and not least the weight.
Cons:For years he has none.
Opinion:Objective bought to use it with the canon 5D old, I use it every now and then, when I want to review the colors of the film, from a lot of satisfaction, warm colors and a fantastic definition to all the focal points, at least my specimen. You can compare it almost to an L series, the opening f3.5-4.5 becomes very useful in places not bright enough and even at the opening the shot is sharp enough, if found at a decent price I recommend even just to try a vintage lens. I'm certainly not going to sell it, i'm holding it tight. The only new lack of stabilizer, vote 10
Pros:Good construction, excellent sharpness up to short focal 70 / 80mm, used price.
Cons:slight loss of sharpness at focal lengths exceeding 80mm
Opinion:Good construction, excellent sharpness up to focal 80 then becomes a bit soft, I used it in the 5d Mk1 and gave me a lot of satisfaction excellent color quality no distortion and vignetting even at full aperture, a lens that in relation to the price of ' Today's used is definitely worth buying for both ff and aps, rating 9.3 in my opinion!
Pros:focal range (on FF it is a good all-rounder); compactness, fast and precise focus; sufficient close-up capacity at the major focal length
Cons:if we really want to find the brightness and the lack of stabilizer
Opinion:I state that the following is related to the first version, produced in Japan up to 2000 and with 5 blades of the diaphragm, since there is also a 28-105 3.5-4.5 USM II produced from 2000 to 2010 in Taiwan and with 7 blades diaphragm. In my hobby activity of small photographic repairs, I had this lens in my hands and I took the opportunity to do some test shots. Mounted on APS 18Mpx, despite the dated project and amateur address, has behaved very well; just looking at 100% I could see a slight less sharpness than the good 18-55IS in the central areas, just more evident and with a little 'color edge. One can therefore think that on non-hyperdense FF the yield can be even better, which, combined with the low price on the used market, could make it a valid all-round for those who do not need large openings.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
