|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
BryzePhoto www.juzaphoto.com/p/BryzePhoto  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8G Pros: Sharpness, weight, excellent AF, brightness Cons: Construction a little plasticose, absence of tropicalization Opinion: I bought this lens 2 months ago skeptical but intrigued, and it's over that I'm in love with it! Now I hardly put it away, only when I need a handyman zoom. Bright with exceptional sharpness, it is light with good yield already to TA, and that gives excellent results already to f/2.2! The Autofocus is very fast and silent, hoping that it continues to be still with the use. It lacks the tropicalization and also the stabilization, the latter poorly necessary given the short focal length of the lens (1/40 would be the safety time, however too long time if you shoot on people or moving subjects). sent on August 28, 2018 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Great seal at high ISO, sensor quality, fast Autofocus and reliable, compact, lightweight body, clear viewfinder view, Cons: Awkward placement of some keys (see ISO), risk address for the shutter Opinion: I come from the experience with a D610, I was already happy with that car, a somber D750 admittedly is another planet! The estate at high ISO is exceptional, I tested up to 10,000 ISO noise is still tolerable and perfect color. The handle is very handy and lightweight machine. In addition to the estate at high ISO the sensor excels in dynamic range, recovery of shadowing is very high and also burn the highlights is difficult, and you retrieve easily the overexposure is not excessive. The only flaw of the machine if you really want to find it is the placement of some keys: Fn front sometimes crush it with the ring finger during shooting unintentionally, and the ISO button would be extremely convenient to put it in the upper screen area, as in professional (see D850, D500, D5). It is also famous for the misfortune of this machine about references (ben 3 officers) for various reasons. If I recommend the Nikon D750? Absolutely Yes! The risk of recall is there and is also annoying, but Nital eventually solves the problem and for the capabilities of this machine in my opinion worth taking this small risk! sent on April 23, 2018 |
 | Nikon D3200 Pros: Weight, Size, Workable RAW files Cons: ISO Holding, Dimensions, Engine Failure AF Opinion: The classic basic entry level, good to start and understand if you can chew the photo or not, but also for the unpretentious cameraman wanting to have a full manual camera control. It also allows RAW images to be saved, so even the latter can have full control of the shot result using RAW management software. Weight and dimensions are a double cutter for this car. On the one hand, being small, it's easy to take in hiking or hiking (I personally took it to a trip to Spain, which I would not have done with the D610), occupying little space, but on the other hand the small size certainly does not help the camera. rnThe ISO seal (of course) is embarrassing. Already at 200 ISO noise is present, making it highly disturbed already at 800 ISO. But being a lower end entry level, it could not be otherwise. Moreover, the impossibility à to use the automatic MAF with lenses D or anyway AF (without internal motor) is a pretty annoying thing. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: Great Sensor, High Lights / Shadow Recovery, Highly Managed High ISO, Excellent RAW, Dual SD Slot, Price Cons: Vagal AF with little light, which becomes unusable with very little light, MAF Point Arrangement, Awkward ISO Button, Buffer Opinion: The sensor has a very high dynamic range and returns saturated colors at the right point. In addition, the noise is contained, practically almost absent up to 640-800 ISO, and becomes visible (but easily attenuated) at 1600-2000 ISO; usable with criterion up to 4000 ISO, at 5000 the color begins to be "puffy", so if possible it is best to avoid pushing so far (the maximum ISO value is 6400, the next values ??are with extension ). The dual SD slot allows 3 very convenient modes of use: slot 2 as slot extension 1, slot 2 as slot backup 1 (if you need to take home shots at odds), and 1 RAW slot 2 JPEG slot. Even ergonomics are fairly good, weight is low and present tropicalization. Now let's go to the defects (alas). It would be an excellent car, if the AF was not so poor. Low light conditions are enough for the AF to sometimes attach the subject too late, and if they lower slightly &%2339; the lights (obviously not speaking of darkness, but much more than a shade), the AF starts to go back and forth several times, until it ticks or ticks it and stops infinitely without hooking anything, or gets a cramp to the finger ! Also, the layout of the MAF points on the frame is embarrassing: too central, and reflect the low qualitative quality of the D610's focus compartment. Other sins, certainly not as bad as the poor AF, is the ISO button position: bottom left! It would be far more convenient to swap it with the bracketing activation key, placed under the flash key. Even a slightly more powerful buffer would not be a bad thing given the maximum burst of the 6fps.rn D610 finishing, there are few users complaining of oil stains on the sensor (the defect it suffered from the D600: the D610 was born from the D600 just to eliminate this design defect). I did not have it, and some of them later discovered that it was dust rather than dustoil. It is still possible however that a sporadic construction defect causes the oil to splash on the sensor ... sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 Pros: MAF, Stabilizer, Tropicalization, Sharpness, Colors Cons: Bracket uncomfortable Opinion: The supertele lens is definitely not too heavy for its robust, rugged design, which, with its use, confirms its robustness. The MAF is fast and fairly accurate, rarely mistaken, but this happens to me over 450-500mm free-hand, and I think this is normal given the slight oscillatory motion that may be present during the focus. The stabilizer is effective and reliable even at the maximum focal length, allowing shorter times of 4-5 stops than safety times. Sharpness is already good at TA at the maximum focal distance, and this is good in terms of brightness. The only defect can be the bracket that annoys during the focal shift movement. It should be enough to remove it, but often the use of a monopod or support may be indispensable in using this optic. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Opening, MAF, Defocused, Sharpness, Stabilization, Tropicalization, Colors Cons: Weak metal body paint Opinion: MAF very fast and accurate. At 200mm and TA it is slightly soft (however absolutely usable), but it retrieves very quickly becoming a "blade" already af / 4. Stabilization is frightfully excellent, allowing shots (obviously to static subjects) even 5 stops below the safety threshold. Personally I doubted this, but by doing the test, I took a hand with 1/10 times, observing a total absence of microregion. However, I have also noticed a high battery consumption when the stabilizer is running. The blur is very enjoyable, and the 200mm portrait and the af / 4 aperture results with clear, blurry very soft details. The colors are pure and the perfect contrast. The barrel construction is made of metal, giving the optics a look of high strength but without increasing the total weight, which is still perfectly distributed on the bracket. In addition tropicalization gives more tranquility% 3B in the use of optics in "uncomfortable" climatic and environmental conditions. Used on Nikon D3200 and Nikon D610, never had front / back focus.rnrnPS problems: After 3 months and half of the purchase, I'm going to review the My opinion. The paint on the metal part of the body tends to form small bubbles and shiver. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Focal Range (5x), Stabilization, Sharpness, Defocused Cons: Lack of tropicalization, Distortion at 24mm Opinion: A great handy for FF, very satisfying. Of course the maximum aperture af / 4 is not comparable to that of a f / 2.8, but since the aperture of the constant diaphragm is at all focal points, you can get a beautiful blur with hiking beyond 70mm. Defocused which is soft and pleasing. It also has to say that he already works well at TA and is clear in all his focuses. The stabilizer does his job well, allowing you to recover 3 stops on average and shoot at times unimaginable. Vignetting is visibly present but easily eliminated. The same can not be said of the barrel distortion, heavily present at 24mm (but becomes only recoverable to 28mm). Finally it is a handyman truly impeccable. Given the high use that is inevitably destined for, tropicalization would certainly have lengthened life. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Opening, Price, Lightness, Shed, Defocused Cons: Nobody Opinion: Absolutely unsurpassed value for money! The color rendition is very beautiful, it gives slightly warm colors, making it suitable for portraiture (not at all being a 50mm). Lightweight and lightweight, it easily enters a pocket. Sharpness is very good at TA, to become excellent af / 2.8. Distortion is virtually absent, as well as absolutely absent is chromatic aberration. TA vignetting is really very small and it is extremely easy to solve in PP (if you really want to be frown and take it off) .nn I have never felt the needle, for example, having the front lens back in 2-3 cm from the outer edge. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 40mm f/2.8 G Micro Pros: Lightweight, Sharpness, Defocused, Price Cons: MAF sometimes slow and inaccurate, Construction slightly plastic Opinion: Being a macro lens, it enjoys excellent sharpness. The maximum aperture and focal length make it a usable target beyond macros, portraits, street, and close-ups. In the right circumstances it can also be useful for still life. Blurry, although it is a macro, is quite soft and very pleasing. The lens, though DX, is very useful with FF format. Even without active "on cam" crop, vignetting is not excessive (in some cases it is almost completely absent) and can be corrected with a light PP crop. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 28mm f/2.8 D Pros: Price, Weight, Size, Opening Cons: Distortion Opinion: Very lightweight lens for street and landscaping. In my opinion it is very suitable for this latter field because of its color rendering. The AF is no lightning, especially depending on the machine on which it is mounted (I remember that AF is not equipped with internal focusing engine). On APS-c can be a good handy handset, as it becomes the equivalent of a 42mm on FF.rnNel complex, the contrast and sharpness yield is, however, comparable to that of a good zoom, and usually from a fixed you expect a little more. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Focal Length, Stabilizer, Price Cons: Poor Sharpness, Poor Light, Distortion, Chromatic Aberration Opinion: A high-powered, high-powered kite kit, which allows a neophyte to learn various techniques, and to figure out which one might be the most suitable photo genre for him. By increasing the focus, I noticed that sharpness drops dramatically over 70-80 mm. The distortion is high especially in the wide angle, but can be easily corrected in PP. Even the chromatic aberration is very high, but it can also be easily corrected in PP most of the time. sent on October 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR II Pros: Weight, Dimensions, Stabilization, Price, Usage IR Cons: Plasticous, Brightness, Sharpness Opinion: Kit-based optics, certainly not excellent but not to be underestimated too much - can give you great satisfaction. For what it costs, the lens is definitely worth it, and because of its small size and light weight, it's easy to take on a vacation or a photo tour. Its too-worked lenses also allow the use of the same objective with machines that collect only infrared light, without annoying hotspots and flare clean. sent on October 15, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
