|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Stef_pz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Stef_pz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-E3 Pros: Dimensions - Image quality - Aesthetics - Perceived quality of the camera body/solidity - Price Cons: Secondary: fixed screen - battery life - smartphone connection can be improved Opinion: Camera that with the right lenses manages to express its full potential. Unbeatable quality/size and quality/price ratio! With compact lenses it literally becomes pocket-sized. Good holding up to 1600 iso, good quality jpeg. Pleasant physical rings on the machine body and very high overall perceived quality. Recommended for professionals looking for a comfortable second body and beginners who want something more than the plastic entry level. Convenient joypad to move between menus and settings. Very nice aesthetics of the camera body. Small cons, in my opinion secondary: second battery needed on the road because of the short duration, fixed screen, connection with smartphone not very fast. Has slight delay at startup sent on January 16, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 Pros: Size, Sharpness, overall yield, price Cons: Lack of diaphragm ring Opinion: Lens to have in place. It is one of the few lenses that really allows you to carry the camera in your pocket in the truest sense of the word. This without sacrificing quality, with a very versatile focal point in my opinion, which adapts to many different situations. Surprised by the high sharpness. Honest autofocus, discreetly fast. Not very bright but still sufficient opening in many situations. Finally, it can be purchased at a price that I think is honest. sent on March 05, 2021 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: Image quality, size, second screen, command layout, internal autofocus engine, dual memory slot, viewfinder Cons: yield at high ISO, improved autofocus Opinion: I love the Nikon 7xxx line, as it offers high performance at a more affordable price. Optical park of course vast, for all tastes. The body is almost PRO, the double screen is fundamental, you can not do without it! Excellent yield if used with good quality lenses. Good also the RAW coming out of it. Comfortable customizable front buttons on the front. I signal the presence of intervallometro to program intervals intervallati.rnIl weight is not negligible but inevitable with a similar body, excellent grip. Obviously the yield at high ISO is not that of a ff but up to ISO 1000 the files are still of good quality. Autofocus not at the top, probably one of the (few) things improved in the following models. The double memory slot is very convenient. sent on February 04, 2018 |
 | Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, build quality, versatility Cons: Weight, AF to be adjusted Opinion: Good lens for ff, versatile, excellent construction and at an acceptable price. Excellent stabilization and very clear. The weight is remarkable, it makes you feel traveling. As sometimes happens with the objectives Sigma goes a moment calibrated the mf on some specimens, problem solvable in the car itself but boring at the beginning. Filters 82mm expensive but that I share with tokina 17-35 so personally becomes a pro. Preferred to the competition given the remarkable sharpness sent on January 26, 2018 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Sharpness, quality of materials, focal range Cons: Af to adjust well Opinion: Good lens, very versatile and clear. Weight in the norm, good quality of the materials, and excellent stabilization. Discrete photos in macro that I used infrequently. It is an excellent travel lens that often allows you to face the whole day without changing your goal. Less bright than the competition but more versatile, so I preferred it. As sometimes happens with the objectives Sigma goes a moment calibrated the 'Af on some specimens, problem solvable in the car itself but boring at the beginning.rn sent on January 26, 2018 |
| Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Sharpness, quality of materials, focal range Cons: Mf to be fine Opinion: Good lens, very versatile and clear. Weight in the norm, good quality of the materials, and excellent stabilization. Discrete photos in macro that I used infrequently. It is an excellent travel lens that often tells you to face the whole day without changing your goal. Less bright than the competition but more versatile, so I preferred it. sent on January 26, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness, f1.8, price, WEIGHT and SIZE, price, versatility Cons: Af improvable Opinion: Objective that every DX owner should have. Excellent sharpness, very bright, pleasant blurred. The small size and the low weight make you want to go out always with the machine in tow. Very recommended for evening shots due to the high brightness. The focus is a bit noisy and improved but nothing to worry about. It does not disdain portraits in the foreground, excellent for portraits and even for landscapes in some situations. Perfect for street. Personally preferred to the 50mm on the right for the versatility that comport.rnVisto the price, I highly recommend adding the lens to your kit. sent on January 26, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Price, comfortable focal Cons: Dark Opinion: Objective without too many claims, good range of focal length that makes it very exploitable in all situations, especially traveling. Good price for used quality Acceptable quality, good AF. A little too dark. Definitely recommended as the first kit lens as an alternative to 18-55 because of the same quality but with a more exploitable focal length. sent on January 26, 2018 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Value for money, weight and size, perfect focal range. Cons: Bad quality at the edges Opinion: Good lens wide angle right, clear in the middle but loses a lot at the edges. Little bright for astrophotography.rnMuse used in travel as the focal allows to exploit it in more situations than other lenses of the same segment.rnLeggero and of small size, I recommend the purchase if found at a good price. sent on January 26, 2018 |
 | Tokina AF 17-35mm f/4 AT-X Pro FX Pros: Cost, PESO and footprint, sharpness Cons: flare, inconvenient AF/MF passage Opinion: Overall very recommended lens, low price, quality with reduced weight and footprints, from dx. Absolutely acceptable distortion. Taken as I was looking for something crisp and light to take on the road, taking advantage of the ability to use the 82mm filters I already owned for sigma 24-105. Not recommended for astronomy as f4. Switching from af to mf cumbersome, uncomfortable when working with nd filters. Presence of flare not indifferent sent on January 26, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
