|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AlePhotoLattu89 www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlePhotoLattu89 ![]() |
![]() | Panasonic Leica DG 12-60mm f/2.8-4.0 ASPH OIS Pros: Sharpness, construction, weight Cons: No one in my opinion Opinion: I have this wonderful lens for about a week. I was pleasantly amazed by its extreme sharpness at the focal lengths between 2.8 and 16 (besides it suffers much diffraction). Very fast and precise Autofocus (combined with G9), impeccable construction and very low weight and dimensions (I also have the Big Brother Zuiko 12-60 for 4/3). The only flaw, perhaps, is the price of the lens if found out of the kit. In fact, the new lens costs about 1000 euros, if found by Kit is located at about 700 and then the "game is worth the candle". sent on July 18, 2018 |
![]() | Panasonic G9 Pros: Ergonomics, monitor on the top, file sharpness Cons: Weight if compared to a mirrorless Opinion: What a show!!! After a week end test (I'm undecided between the G9 and the Olympus M1 Mark II) I must admit that this mirrorless has conquered me. Literally. Ergonomics at maximum levels for those like me who have big hands, monitors on the top (as on SLRs) that I find very comfortable. Noise at the click almost inaudible, fast and precise autofocus and then the files... that sharpness!!! You think that in post-production, on the shadows, you recover almost 3 stops. Great!!!! sent on May 14, 2018 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: Sharpness, professional construction, optical stabilization, tropicalization. Cons: Nobody Opinion: A fantastic goal. Incredible sharpness at all focal lengths, stabilization in optics that allows you to recover 1 and a half stops and professional construction make this a lens "must have" for professionals and non.rnE 'a lens to do everything, a lens that can save in certain situations (reach 100mm - 200mm equivalent FF). rnIngrombre and weight in my opinion correct that well balance the use of a professional with E-M1 and E-M1 Mark II. rnPrice, perhaps, a little altino but it must be considered that this lens is equivalent to having 2/3 lenses in one. sent on January 29, 2018 |
![]() | Olympus E-1 Pros: Ergonomics, color fidelity, file quality Cons: Excessive noise over ISO 400 (but it is a reflex from 2003) Opinion: An exceptional camera. Reflex of 2003 with unparalleled ergonomics. It mounts a CCD sensor that makes colors very true to the truth (the top for portraits and landscape). Lacks the stabilizer and the noise over ISO 400 "feels" (but we are talking about a reflex from 2003). For the rest, an exceptional camera !! rnAd today is found, used, about 120/130 euros which makes it really a bargain. sent on January 07, 2018 |
![]() | Olympus E-3 Pros: Ergonomics, stabilizer presence, tropicalization, double memory slot Cons: High ISO noise (1600 - 3200 ISO) Opinion: A camera that, in my opinion, can still be said today.rnForte of the tropicalization, the presence of the stabilizer and the yield on incredibly faithful colors, is a camera that makes and will always be part of my kit.rnUni flaw, but normal for the year in which it was developed and put on sale (2006/2007), it is high noise at high ISO; we say acceptable at ISO 1600, exaggerated at ISO 3200. rn sent on December 04, 2017 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f/1.8 Pros: Nitidize, blurry beautiful Cons: Nothing Opinion: Fantastic, sharp goal, incredible engraving. A lens to have and to guard jealously. Maybe the weight is slightly higher than the fixed lens range dedicated to the m4 / 3 but it does not matter, the quality of this lens goes beyond any possible "defect". RnTipico portrait lens (on FF becomes a 150 mm) offers a really blur. sent on August 29, 2017 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm f/3.5 Macro Pros: Size, weight, optical quality Cons: Diaphragm too little open (3.5) Opinion: Lens purchased more for the sake than for need. Immediately emerges the high sharpness at the center and the minimum focusing distance (about 14/15 mm). Unfortunately, 30 mm are a bit "short" but they are useless. It's a lens created for macros but also (and I add, above all) for still life. RnUnica fails, in my opinion, the diaphragm too closed: it had been a AF / 2.8 lens would be the TOP. sent on August 28, 2017 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me