user66396
| sent on 28 Marzo 2015
Pros: Ergonomics like a glove, each command large comfortable falls brush, shot plush and quiet, good reactivity, the viewfinder of the best for the time, without worries af in ordinary light and poor
Cons: The Live but not felt lack
Opinion: Olympus E1 write today after a decade and passes a contradiction, none the less of those machines, milestones, which you can not prescindere.rnIl look is the most out of the team, to the letter, which does not affect at all the usability Everything falls where it should. If anything it is the relationship with the machine that goes beyond the human experience and goes into territories that, for the simple fact of saying it, engenders of those smiles, touches of elbow or index at the temples: we intended. rnTuttavia, it is not so because the E1 was born for professional photos, and for a pro to slewing as an extension of your body is much more than touch a temple. We, out of metaphor, beyond the sheer maneuverability (excellent) on the borders of pure enchantment, fascination that takes nothing away, indeed, to photos and doing well. Thanks to the sensor "ancient" CCD by Kodak that under conditions of natural light returns all that is required, even though the only "five" million pixels on a format thatis half of the classic Leica or updated Full Frame. rnal respect should recover a past number of Chasseur d'Images and reread that for the same time of the "six" millions of Canon & Nikon, the resilience that the writer put on the same plane, the "small" file of E1. rnNumeri that then you have to agree. And to test proven even with a home printer Hp1220 C (another museum exhibit) a A3 + more than fair, then, imagine the file to more powerful inkjet. In short, between formal and substantial cleaning files just fine, much to offset alone in web.rnQuanto to his skills, sort vexed ques, resistance beyond the traditional 100 Iso, has experienced 800 without worries, reaching up to 3200 then converted rendered in black and white, de facto, and indistinguishable from a classic Kodak Tri-X or Ilford HP5. And if they were, the so-called file pulled, color, not bad too because the grain / noise is added value that gives, gives, thickness and flavor to the image. And withthe current capacity of the soft focus to Photoshop Lightroom and even more, far from impossible to "clean" the E1 .rnSe a limit there is that does not have the Live, of course, but at the time there was no had the Raw although the "compression" JEPG, that the 4/3 is excellently well put, output at 314 DPI (!) goes to offset the large. rnResta finally a milestone by click sweet, the viewfinder extraluminoso and comfortable for people who wear lenses. E1 taken second hand almost "untouched" carrying the first 14/54 f 2.8-3.5. Everything for taking photos and not toy with mire MTF, theological disputes about how many and which pixels are used to this and quello.rnrnrnrnLink rnrnhttp://www.wrotniak.net/photo/43/e1-rev.htmlrnhttp://biofos.com/cornucop/omz_e1.htmlrnhttp://four-thirds.org/en/fourthirds/index.htmlrnhttps://luminous-landscape.com/olympus-e-1/rnhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--vTGaHVVwwrnrnrnPs. There are times of the day that you just pick up the E1 and just turned on, the eye to the viewfinderor click to make them "stretch" the legs, to receive a feeling that with other machines to change impossible: to be the "dark side" of the force! |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
