|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luke_chiarvy www.juzaphoto.com/p/Luke_chiarvy  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 500mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness Cons: Weight and dimensions Opinion: I'm using it for over a year and I must say that, excluding the weight of nearly 4 kg, is on a truly exceptional. I come from a 2.8 and 300, making bird in full frame, I had to always multiply with a 2x tc. The cinquecentone smooth is really a blade multiplied with 1.4 tc series III is still usable (preferably close to f8). With 2x tc series III instead notice a considerable drop of FA and to have a noticeable sharpness, you have to go close to f11: in short, to be used with optimal light. It can be used free hand for short periods, but I prefer to shoot using a monopod. Compared with the 300 2.8 is definitely a lens built more for stalking hunting for traveling. sent on March 13, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Sharpness, AF speed, image stabilizer, use multipliers Cons: Price, weight Opinion: Optical fabulous against that of only the price (but worth all the money spent) and weight (which is not exactly a featherweight, in fact). The sharpness already at room temperature is incredible and the 4-stop IS makes you take in times vermanete unthinkable. The building is granite and the size of the lens are really important (it's still a f / 2.8 tropicalized). The AF is fast, accurate and silent and holds up well the 2X extender series III (unless you work in low light). With the multiplier is going to close at f / 8 and the file is baked, in my opinion, less than the Canon 100-400 in the same aperture. The minimum focus distance of 1.2 m going to beat even from this point of view the previous version. I used it for portraiture and birdlife. For those who have the finances and do not worry about transport and handle an important role, loved it! sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 2.0x III Pros: Sharpness, vignetting and chromatic absence of abberazione Cons: Price Opinion: I soldered the 2X extender series III to my Canon 300 f 2.8 for pictures of birds, and the only caosa that I can look in the negative, is the normal slowdown in focus. The multiplier is weather sealed and rugged construction. In cobinazione used by me (with both APS-C and FF) closing at f / 8 there are abberazioni color, vignetting, and pictures are very sharp. Worth all the money it costs. Very recommended! sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Focal range, sharpness Cons: Abberazioni color, flare, on APS-C you lose the wide angle Opinion: For some months now I'm enjoying the lens size while buying FF I mounted camera with APS-C (a diventamdo 38-168). On 50D and 7D has always behaved well (even in the rain in Valle D'Aosta), but it sacrifices very wide angle and for travel, it would be better to combine the lens with a wide angle lens dedicated to the sensor. It 'a lens handyman, tropical and robust with good performance. The AF is very responsive with excellent clarity (for me even at f4). On the other hand I find it a bit 'too abberazioni comatiche and suffering to flare. sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Using freehand, versatility, compactness, Min focus distance Cons: Soft at room temperature, dim, not weather sealed L series Opinion: I purchased the POMPONE to start to dedicate myself to photo hunt together with a APS-C. The alternative (to the same budget) was the 5.6 L 400 and being able to go back, just buy it with your eyes closed. The "POMPONE" is very versatile but in the end I found myself using the optical prevalemntemente to 400mm (which are 380mm effective). At full aperture the file oven is a bit 'soft and had to close at f / 8 for maximum performance. The AF I always found responsive. The lens is stabilized and can compensate for a couple of stops and the minimum distance of focus (1.8 m) is very good for macro. The pump system found it very useful, along with a weight and the diminutive size, is a super zoom that you can carry everywhere. On the other hand even compared to 400 that is fixed, multiplied, it is not up to its competitor which is always more than valid. If you are looking for a versatile lens the POMPONE is right for you, altriments, ??for birds, I strongly suggest the 400 5.6 L. sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Yield optics, price Cons: Construction optics Opinion: Taken primarily to match the Canon 100 L macro, I used the Canon 300 f / 2,8 L IS. The AF is fast and powerful and I can not fault dips or baked sharpness file from my 7D. Compared with multipliers Canon (version III) found it very plasticky and not sealed, but costs still less than half. sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: Sharpness, no abberazione color, image stabilization Cons: Lacks the tripod ring Opinion: When I had the chance I went on APS-C from macro EF-S 60 in the 100 macro L as a matter of 60 mm and judged the macro a bit 'too short for the photos I wanted to do. The lens is solid, does not weigh too much is weather sealed and the box is equipped with soft bag and lens hood. For photos of insects have always used freehand being able to use the image stabilizer that covers up to 4 stops. In addition to the macro photography, optics lends itself very well for portraits churning file also very detailed iris fully open. It has abberazioni color and sharpness to the edge is for show. Can not be duplicated with the Canon extender, but to our aid, if any, can be used with duplicators Kenko (I have used combined with Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x remaining very satisfied). It 'a lens which I think is wonderful, at a great price, which I highly recommend. sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: lightness range of focal lengths, IS Cons: chromatic aberration and distortion in the corners, a little light, lens hood is not standard Opinion: The Canon 18-200 is a focal interesting perspective that goes from wide to telephoto with a round of nut. It 'a lightweight but not very bright to get the most you have to close some of the aperture stop. If the center of the image is good, the corners are noticed chromatic aberration and distortion. The IS is good and can compensate 2-3 stop vibrations. The hood is not sold as standard. In conclusion, I can say that it is an honest superzoom travel very versatile. sent on February 19, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: lightness range of focal lengths, price Cons: AF, sharpness, lens hood is not standard Opinion: It 'was my first telephoto zoom bought especially for nature photography. It 'a lightweight, easy to carry and very versatile with a good image quality as long as you have to close a couple of stops for ottenre maximum. The AF found it noisy and low light tends not to hang well. The hood does not come with the lens. I sold it to go to the Canon EF 100-400mm F/4.5-5.6 L IS USM for the best image quality and zoom range more useful for photo hunting. sent on February 19, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: AF fast and quiet, excellent sharpness at RT, price Cons: Too short for Macro photo to insects, lens hood is not standard Opinion: It 'was my first macro lens to complete my first camera kit format from Canon lenses 18-200 and 70-300. Lens is very light and with a price / quality tempting. Already great wide open is a lens for aps-c sensor from different functions. For insects and small animals 60mm (90mm), I almost always results too short while for flowers or portraits I've never been disappointed. The AF is fast and quiet and the absence of the SI is not a problem. I sold it only to go to the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM. sent on February 19, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
