|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marco Paradiso www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarcoParadiso  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Quality image stabilizer, sharpness and colors. Cons: focus breathing Opinion: Excellent sharpness at all focal also 2.8, stabilizer that allows shots to 1/10 to 200 mm, beautiful, saturated colors that do not require major interventions in post produzione.rnAnche the boheh is not bad to be a zoom and l ' autofocus has never given me problems combined D750.rnL'unico flaw in my opinion is the sharp focus breathing is suffering, like all the 70 200, which is bothersome in the videos and in close up. rnAd every way is certainly not an insurmountable defect, especially given the prezzo.rn sent on February 11, 2017 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Colors and sharpness, stabilizer, 2.8, Price Cons: Bokeh "onion" of the lights in the background Opinion: Use this goal for over a year on D750 and are satisfied with the risultati.rnLa sharpness is good at all focal also to 2.8, in paticolare the wide side; by f4 onwards it becomes ottma. I've never had problems with the autofocus as read in earlier reviews. Although it is not the fastest in the world always engages the bersagio.rnStabilizzatore 3 stop abundant effettivi.rnrnUn flaw is the "bokeh onion", ie bright circles that form at the highlights in the blurred but they are not uniform inside them concentric circles more or less marked depending on the situation. Cherchi are a reminder of an onion; that a portrait is not just the massimo.rnComunque for the price which is a great acquisto.rnrn sent on January 17, 2017 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Sharpness, well corrected aberrations, contrast, stabilizer, aperture 2.8 Cons: A little heavy, but it is normal for this kind of lens Opinion: I use this lens on d750 for a year and are fully soddisfatto.rnLa sharpness is really good at all focal lengths and apertures. For astrophotography is ideal thanks to vighettatura not excessive and very well correct aberrations. rnAnche the contrast and the colors in my opinion are very belli.rnIn shots freehand in places with little light stabilizer is very useful. Often I can shoot with a time of 0.5 seconds without micromosso.rnPer against is heavy and can not be fitted screw filters, but is a problem common to all the wide-angle and pushed luminosi.rnIn conclusion excellent lens and excellent value for money . sent on January 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Quality and workability of RAW, dynamic range, held at high ISO, autofocus, ergonomics and lightness Cons: non illuminated button, shutter 1/4000 and lack curtain cover eye Opinion: Use this fantastic SLR for over a year for landscapes, portraits, sports, architecture, astrophotography, and I will take no satisfaction. rnI files are extremely clean and workable and even forgive evident exposure errors. The noise at high ISO is contained and the autofocus works well even with very low light, at least goals f / 2.8 or brighter. The body is lightweight and well balanced except with heavy abbastenza objectives, such as the 70 200 f2.8. In this case a battery grip might be useful. rnPer night photography would be very comfortable illuminated buttons and drop-down eyepiece cover, but it is certainly not a problem insormontabile.rnPer conclude recommend this camera for the great value for money, in my opinion the migiore home Nikon.rn sent on January 08, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
