|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Roberto Scorzoni65 www.juzaphoto.com/p/RobertoScorzoni65  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 300mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Pros: Robustessa, sharpness, autofocus good speed. Mechanism of insertion / removal of the tripod bracket very well done. Purchased used is the real deal. Cons: Hood a bit 'cumbersome, Stafa inadequate tripod to size. Mine was not perfectly calibrated like autofocus but the assitance Sigma is excellent and gave me back a jewel. Opinion: The lens is great, sharp and the quality of the products shots is high. The autofocus is satisfaction, fast and quiet and overall we can work well freehand: the weight is not quite negligible but the size and balance make it very manageable in the pan. Comes easily, in a medium backpack and does not create too many problems for the trasporto.rnNon would purchase it again given the sharp depreciation that suffers, but a good used retains its value over time and allows you to have a high-level lens at a cost medium tool. I've protected with a neoprene cover Photography Outdoor Gear on less than € 40 to compensate for the lack of weather sealing. sent on December 15, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D Pros: image quality, superb bokeh, color rendering. Of professional camera bodies autofocus is more than satisfactory Cons: lack AF internal, VR (if desired) Opinion: Never sell this lens, I purchased new. It has a build quality Currently in Range no longer detectable. rnMetallo excellent and not plastic made in China, professional image quality workmanship, few risk breaking components. rnPossiedo cameras pro or semipro and all autofocus, criticized by many, it is very quiet and fast. I used it for sports photographs with rapid and unpredictable movements (eg. Tennis) with great satisfaction, as well as for shooting wildlife, always satisfied. Never occurred to front or back focus phenomena, always ready lens and rapida.rnPersonalmente believe it can be a lack of use prompted the internal autofocus motor, VR for me, of long life perspective lenses, is just one more component at risk of failure, but I understand that the comparison is a lack of modern lenses. rnIl weight issue that is sometimes referred to as a flaw, it is 1,300 grams: the 70-200 VRII average peak paintings and praised by all weighs 1,451 grams per s ...turn on and off in the pound you have to "climb" on f / 4 model. rnPer me, if you find a good used, with the price / quality ratio is an unbeatable choice for the amateur (mode separately). sent on October 27, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 500mm f/4 D ED II Pros: Sharpness, contrast and excellent bokeh. Lightning-fast and silent autofocus. build quality. collar for well-sized tripod and well challenged when used as a carrying handle. Cons: Availability, lens hood exaggerated. Opinion: This lens is a spectacle sublime build quality, excellent image quality, perhaps the biggest lens used (with training) with hand-held tilt; works fine with multipliers (personally I use almost exclusively matnetere 1.4 for the highest possible quality); I do not like too much the VR, the price to pay in my opinion is not worth the benefit obtained and then if the use is mainly with beans bag, tripod or monopod, if they can do without. Absolutely be protected with neoprene covers for use in the shed because, given the size, you may accidentally scratch the barrel. The lens hood is really exaggerated size, even with camo cover is impossible not to notice, it becomes almost a telescope ... rnrn sent on October 26, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: sublime picture quality, robustness, versatility Cons: distortion at 24mm, lens hood a bit 'cumbersome and delicate Opinion: This lens I will not change anything, do not think the VR I could be of interest on a perspective of this kind, only more at risk of breaking components in time .... rnRisponde well in every situaizone light, contrato and complexity of use. rnObiettivo which is a guarantee, excellent bokeh, fire fast, quiet. And 'particularly robust, and weight, appreciable, is well manageable in view of the construction quality offering. It 's always in my backpack. sent on October 26, 2016 |
 | Nikon D500 Pros: frame rate, buffer capacity autofocus, high ISO, commands "standards" that do not require the study to those already used by pro or semipro models. Cons: My model requires you to perform fine tuning on some autofocus lens. In particular I have checked with the Nikkor 500 f / 4 ED II, which presented backfocus conspicuous. LCD tilting a bit 'cumbersome and appearance "delicate". Opinion: For me it is an excellent machine for the amateur evolved in field sports and wildlife. I do not think that it can be used by professionals instead of D5 (with which it shares several components) as I read in some article. rnL'impugnatura was too low compared to other models of equivalent quality and makes it less "safe" holding with one hand. RNA my opinion the elimination of on-camera flash is a sensible choice on a camera of this level, it would be useful, however, maintain some external flash control system, now only feasible sacrificing a flash on camera or buying triggers radio or the SU-800.rnIl overall rate is positive, especially influenced by the frame rate and the powerful autofocus, suitable for any situazione.rn sent on October 26, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
