|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Neverapple www.juzaphoto.com/p/Neverapple  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D3 Pros: A historic camera. Cons: Enormous. Opinion: This camera is really challenging to use (despite my big hands), but on the other hand it gives a feeling of solidity and resistance remarkable. From the photographic point of view, despite its now reduced resolution, from results that do not disfigure with the latest sensors both in terms of color rendering and detail. sent on September 11, 2023 |
 | Sony A100 Pros: Quality to sell Cons: maybe the sound of the shutter a little loud Opinion: If you had called by another name this machine would surely have made history for the absolute quality of the Files that pulls out, a detail and a saturation of the excellent colors, with the right optics the autofocus not by any problem is responsive in low light conditions, even high iso noise (common for machines of those years, no camera was "immune") with current software is manageable and solvable optimally , the 10 Mpx? they are not all indeed not bad if even in 2020 the same Sony has pulled out the a7 SIII with the beauty of 12Mpx obvious other camera planet, but the "old" little sister defends herself more than well. sent on August 31, 2020 |
 | Nikon D80 Pros: Gorgeous colors, noise all in all contained to high iso that for the d80 stop at 1600 if pulled to 3200. Cons: But we're joking. Opinion: Thanks to the reviewers that preceded me I met the D80, since I was looking for my Nikon optics a not very expensive machine (in the past I was the owner of a D750) bought with 15,000 shots for about 89th !!!!!!!!!! practically new, no sign of wear, if I had paid much more it would have been a bargain anyway, the features and results are really great saturated and natural colors. A beautiful beast. sent on August 22, 2020 |
 | Sigma SD1 Pros: Iper Details Cons: How to have a 100 ASA film can not pull it beyond the 400ASA noise penalty. Opinion: The difference with the rest of the sensors is embarrassing (for the others) I would also venture with the average size Bayer (I have seen the Pentax 645Z on this site, but I do not think it comes to SD1), foveon returns incredible details in absolute terms if we consider that this is an Apsc beh! paraphrasing other reviewers: "Hardly any other cameras could be the only piece of a photographer." sent on October 01, 2017 |
 | Panasonic Lumix TZ70 / ZS50 Pros: Small Robust, great photographic quality. Cons: The Flash position, the touch trigger button. Opinion: It's a really small and handy pocket machine, its 12Mpx I think (considering the size of the sensor) is the optimal solution to keep the noise acceptable, RAW takes very nice photos, Jpg plasticous is very obvious as all the machines Economic band (I would abolish the jpg or at least I would not use it, it made sense when the memories were measured in mega) .rn sent on July 09, 2017 |
 | Sony A7r Pros: Lightness, usability, quality of photos. Cons: Personally I have not found nothing wrong. Opinion: Sony was the first to have produced a usable sensor in digital history with the 0.3 megapixel Sony Mavica, (other times) produces sensors of almost any Nikon, the quality with these premises there is all. And 'a light machine, but at the same time has a good feeling of strength I use with so-called objectives "vintage" rnche unfortunately with my Nikon D750 I could not use properly for different focal draft. An excellent "Beast." Ps: ISO range of 50 to 25600 sent on September 16, 2016 |
 | Sony A5000 Pros: Certainly the price, I have paid € 319, the photo quality is really very good. Cons: The lack of optical viewfinder. Opinion: This camera has really good grip seems a compact, but obviously it is a mirrorless APSC with a great sensor, I have used it several focal also vintage with more interesting results, but unfortunately the note for me absolutely negative is the lack of viewfinder (I did not think), the use of the camera through the only display is really stressful (thanks to my view) especially with voluminous and "heavy optics". sent on September 06, 2016 |
 | Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Pros: Very fast he never uncertainties, makes great photos, it will not be "fashionable" (thankfully) and is an excellent phone. Cons: It is cheap. ;-)) Opinion: I bought this phone because he was tired of the Android phones that systematically now are fine a month and then start to get stuck, and are prey for viruses and various crap, my 640 is now proven reliable fast his strength is in the immediacy of the functions, but what really amazed me and the photo quality that this phone does sent on June 02, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
