RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Bomba
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bomba



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Bomba


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

samyang_af18_f2-8feSamyang AF 18mm f/2.8 FE

Pros: Footprint, optical quality and cost

Cons: Problems in the backlights with sun on the pitch

Opinion: I was oriented to Loxia21 or Sony20/1.8, but since my accquisti are not compulsive when I was presented with the opportunity to use this lens having the opportunity to test it before the purchase I decided to try it. I already own the 16/35 is Canon and I already had the opportunity to use 20mm when I had analog Nikon and the 14/2.8 Fuji,I was not very inclined to go down to lower focal points as a field angle, also because I had the 14 Sammy for my tastes and attitudes I used too little, of the series taken-used-resold after a few months at the same price. Going back to the 18th that I use on Sony 7rII I immediately found myself well resolution, vignetting and above all surprisingly good distortion for the focal even considering the cost even from new. As already written in the premise you have to be careful when the sun enters the field in the strong backlights that can bring flares and phantom images, but knowing it can be overcome and in any case in my opinion it always remains a must in the value for money. All this must then be verified individually, given the fact that according to many the variability due to quality control must be verified between the subject and the subject.

sent on June 10, 2021


canon_16-35_f4isCanon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Pros: Optical quality already at full aperture, solid but not excessive construction for weights and dimensions in relation to quality.

Cons: a16mm Distortion (resolvable with one click) however reasonable for the focal, some problem in backlight with the sun in the field, but there can stand specially for a zoom at these focal. It is not a feather but it is not said that it is a disadvantage.

Opinion: I had the 17/40 which had a very good cost/quality ratio, but I must admit that this exceeds it clearly from all points of view both optical and mechanical with in addition the stabilization that in dark interiors helps; if we really want to find a flaw in the colors My little brother's natives preferred them but you can remedy them.

sent on February 22, 2019


fujifilm_14mmFujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R

Pros: High quality optics with an enviable distortion correction for the focal (optical level), with minimum dimensions.

Cons: I'm struggling to find them.

Opinion: It is a lens that would be taken for example for those who love a focal with this angle of field. It has a very good quality with a level of distortion at optical level (incorrect via software) that allows to use it also for architecture; My personal opinion is excellent for both Steet and landscaping as well as for urban development. I found one of the same characteristics with dimensions proportionate for FF I would take the flight without even thinking about it.

sent on January 20, 2019


nikon_20_f2-8dNikon AF 20mm f/2.8 D

Pros: Optical quality, color rendering dimensions

Cons: Backlit

Opinion: I used this analogue for years mainly for DIA, excellent lens for both landscape and interior and street, I really liked the color rendering and the low distortion considered the focal, and optics with dimensions and weights liable compared to the same focal length nowadays.rnVenduto to change system and then bought back to use on Canon FF, then resold later to purchase 16/35 f4 IS, the only flaw that I found is in the shots against the light and mainly in digital, problem that in analogy I had not noticed or at least was much less marked.rn

sent on January 16, 2018


fujifilm_x-t10Fujifilm X-T10

Pros: Excellent value for money

Cons: Nothing rilevantern

Opinion: Taken in conjunction with the 27 / 2.8 as a camera always bring below to be attached to my Canon kit has always earned more spazio.rnIn I had originally thought to XT1 but made the necessary evaluations I preferred the XT10 as a fraction of the cost it had everything what I needed: small, image quality quite good also raising the ISO and also in Jpeg.rnInoltre the orientation features allows you to take pictures without being noticed in the street, so much so that I took even the 14 / 2.8.Alcuni complaining about the rapidity autofocus not rnall'altezza but for my needs is not a problem, what matters to me is being able to put in your pocket and always have it at hand when needed and on this RNE priceless. rn rn

sent on May 13, 2016




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me