|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andrea47 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Andrea47  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Minolta AF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Apo Pros: A very compact optics considering the focal extension, light perhaps even too much, with a little more excellent post production definition Cons: Maybe too light, the zoom lock is missing Opinion: I bought it used these days, I paid a bit expensive (139€ a year warranty) but I took it in the store where I regularly serve and I feel great, very helpful and competent staff, if sometimes problems can have always been solved without any difficulty. I use it with Sony A99II and Sony A77II and compared it to the 70/400 G SSM, I did the test with the 99II and only at 300mm in both FF and APS-C. Tests done with the stand to avoid micromosso and iso 100. I was really satisfied checking the 100% images the difference is not so striking, The shots taken with the 70/400 are a little brighter. sent on December 06, 2020 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: All Cons: Nothing Opinion: Bought today an outstanding lens for sharpness at all apertures, maybe it suffers a little at 1.4 but at 1.6 a already recovered, wonderful colors and contrast excellent construction beautiful also to see, good price even if I bought it in a physical store of items Photographic and without a doubt costs something more than on the internet but I like more to buy in the store because I can try and if I needed warranty intervention, the seller thinks about the addition and withdrawal. Mounted on Sony at 99II and if necessary on Sony A77II sent on June 29, 2018 |
 | Sony 70-400mm f/4-5.6 G SSM Pros: Relatively light, sharpness at all focal and already good even at full aperture, AF silent and precise Cons: Maybe AF not too fast Opinion: I bought it today used in very good condition, if it were not for minor scratches almost imperceptible on the hood would seem new, as I was saying maybe the af not too fast but once hooked the subject with the continuous AF does not lose it, maybe I have not paid Little 890.00 euros I could insist for for an additional discount, had started from 1000 euros bought in a photo shop with a one year warranty. The few tests I made today make me think it's a great target. I work with A77II and A99II sent on June 29, 2018 |
 | Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM Pros: Lightweight, sharp, contrast, lack of games between the price parts Cons: Focus ring, impossible to correct the focus if you are working in automatic focus, zoom ringing mormida but scratching Opinion: I bought it so I can always have it when I get a zoom without having to carry the tripod, I use it on both the 77II and the 99II (setting APS-C) always carry it, and anyway the Sigma 120-400 (Kg 1,800) is impossible. It is a lens that allows you to have fun, nothing to do with the 1600's of the Sony or the 24-105 of the Sigma, but considering the price 199 € its does it terribly especially if it does not open at all opening but always closes of a stop. For the fact that it fires by turning the lens does not bother me, I do not employ filters of any kind, but what I miss is the ability to correct the focus if shot in automatic fire. All I would say would be a fairly well-designed lens without any games between the parts even though the zoom ring is a bit scratchy. sent on November 18, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Pros: image quality, sharpness, lightness, price Cons: I would say no Opinion: I bought it today, I took the old model because having a Sony A99II no use stabilizer for now I tried it at home and it seems exceptional. Someone points out the slow pace of the Focus and the long barrel hike. If it is working without the macro function the focus is fast and accurate, with the macro function and true that the focus goes into crisis and begins to go back and forth, but if you wanted with focheggia before enlargement continuous focus and then we approach the subject the focus is precise and you can shoot on the fly, also in the majority of cases, the macro is run on the stand with manual focus so there is no problem. sent on March 17, 2017 |
 | Sony A99 II Pros: Making fire fast, backlit sensor, outstanding image quality, handling, noise content at high ISO, etc. etc. Cons: almost useless front multifunction knob (according to me) could remain as the exclusive 77II for choosing the type of focus. to change the memory slots must rnentrare in the old A390 menu which had two slots for change was a switch inside the door of the slots (more practical) Opinion: I purchased the 14th of this month and I found there are now well because the shape, size, and layout of the controls is equal to 77II camera I own for almost two years. It has a hybrid system of focus that I think is ineuagualiabile, with original optics you have a choice of the focus point that covers the entire frame into it sofrappongono the traditional 79 points that become all cross working and the two systems in tandem the result is accuracy and speed even in low light. sent on November 19, 2016 |
 | Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM Pros: Price, sharpness at all focal lengths, (intermediate diaphragms) good stabilizer, fast focusing, (with good lighting conditions) good construction. Cons: weight, Opinion: Excellent price-quality ratio, a amateur photographer I do not regret an original in my case Sony 70-400.rnComunque to get the most, given the weight need a good tripod. Too bad you can not remove the bracket without removing the lens from the camera. You hear that the Sigma often have defects in construction, I have recently purchased two Sigma lenses. 10-20 f3.5 and 120-400rne veramento are very satisfied of the two lenses. sent on August 04, 2016 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM Pros: Image quality (sharpness, color, contrast) Excellent construction, fluid rings, made fast and quiet autofocusing Cons: Perhaps the diameter of the filters because expensive Opinion: I bought 30 March I made a few test shots and I'm excited. The only flaw in 10 focal loses sharpness on the edges and sometimes there is a slight chromatic aberration on the right edge. (All this at a magnification of 100% printable enlargements you notice only a slight loss of sharpness at the edges) A ??focal 11 the sharpness becomes good even at the edges. I believe that the diameter of the filters is justified by the brightness of 3.5 at all focal so large diameter lens. I use it on a Sony a77II and Sony A390. sent on April 03, 2016 |
 | Sony A77 II Pros: Fast autofocus, weight distribution, excellent image quality and tropical conditions, for what it offers low price etc etc, Cons: i do not know Opinion: I bought this camera in early February and I can say simply fantastic in all situations. It has a truly optimal handling, color rendering that I would call perfect associated with an equally perfect sharpness. It has an excellent video section with the ability to shoot in 4K amateur although to me the video of little interest. sent on April 04, 2015 |
 | Sony A390 Pros: Excellent price / quality Cons: Noise at higher ISO values Opinion: For me, I come from a Minolta Dimage I7 and a Konika Minolta A 200 I seem to have acquired a very good camera, easy to use and at the same time has everything you need for some good shots. I've always said that the photo is a photographer and not the car if I'm wrong then the shots I think that the fault is mine also have to consider the possibility (for those who can afford it) to mount optics such as first class Zeis. In conclusion I consider myself to be satisfied with the color rendition that the sharpness of the picture. 24/08/2012. I have to think again, at ISO 1600 with a slight touch-up through the program with the camera you still have good shots and ISO 3200 shots acceptable sent on January 17, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
