|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Wallyb58 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Wallyb58  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Zeiss Sonnar 85mm f/2.8 (C/Y) Pros: As a pro I would definitely put the fidelity of the colors looks like what the human eye sees and also the ease of focusing Cons: At the moment I can't find any Opinion: Having found an excellent opportunity online to buy this lens that I missed to use it as a portrait, but from the photos I left in the gallery, you can use it for any other situation I am happy with the quality of the optics compared with the Yashica that I also bought, which is its competitor always 85 / f2.8 good too, but surely the fidelity of the colors that leaves the Zeiss is a little higher but certainly the silver medal goes to the Yashica Another positive note is that I have now used it with a Fuji Xt4, but I also intend to try it with the Sony at 7R3 With the Fuji already in itself releases you extraordinary JPEGs and also in this case with a very light post just to adjust the tones and frame a little better the photo come out of the exceptional shots, and clear that it is a lens to use for photos a little' posed because having the manual focus begins to be a little more complicated to go and try to catch a photo in motion, but not impossible But I will reserve to add a further review when I have also tried it on the Sony sent on February 21, 2022 |
 | Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 DG DN C Pros: Lightweight and compact, excellent optical quality Cons: At the moment I don't know Opinion: I've had it for a few days but the feeling is very good. Smooth rings with the right clutch. In my gallery I posted a couple of photos with slight post. I would say great in the middle on all the focal points, very good even at the edges. I confirm the somewhat cumbersome lampshed to insert. I had the Tamron 28-75, but that gives me the impression that I'm more incisive. Objective update, I used this lens during the Alba Rally on June 12.13; I have to say that it is a lens that has further convinced me for the overall quality, for the resolve in the photos and above all for the speed of the AF Photographing sports such as cars is always a complicated thing and I have to say that some photos turned out of focus but many came in an exceptional way , so I can only confirm the goodness of this lens In the galleries there are several photos I posted of the event sent on June 04, 2021 |
 | Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS C Pros: Compactness and weight. Good resolve. Great price Cons: At the maximum excursion that is to 400, even if there is stabilization, and used in my case with the Sony A7R3, freehand the image dances a lot. Lack of tripod ring to buy apart Opinion: I've been using it for just over a month, I haven't been able to do any big tests, but I'm very happy with the results. Af very fast, hooks the subject, weight and a positive component in use very well. Of course to use it with easel you have to buy the collar apart, found in the net at 45€ Freehand at full excursion, at 400, the optics dance a little. sent on January 12, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Outstanding yield. Being Zeiss optics perfect for all focal lengths. Cons: I would say none except the cost. Opinion: Excellent lens I would say for portraits that street or landscapes. rnThe fixed focal length of f / 4 may seem dark, but I assure you that even in low light conditions excellent photos are obtained. Of course, being 16-35 its particular application could be said in landscapes or architectural photos. rnLight aberration of the lens at the edges but nothing that can not be adjusted in post production. I'm using it with great satisfaction on a Sony A7RII body. I'd say it's a great match. I also wait to try the 24-105 version just released. sent on December 26, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
