|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
DanieleIurissevich www.juzaphoto.com/p/DanieleIurissevich  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Benro A2682TB1 Travel Angel II Pros: Economical, sturdy, good construction, short column in each room, built-in monopod, 4 sections, dimensions Cons: The block of the legs requires a good rotation of the knob, last section unstable, lacks the block to 90 °, the missing block of the head with counter-screw Opinion: After months of investigations and readings to post on the forum, I opted for this tripod selected from Manfrotto 190 Manfrotto 055, Triopo, Mantona and other Benro.rnA my opinion is the most balanced (and in fact it is almost a must have, the number that they see around). The model code reads as follows: A2682. The "A" indicates "Aluminium". Alternatively, "C" for carbon. The 2 indicates the section of the legs (29mm). In alternative 1 indicates the most stretta.rnL'8 section indicates the number of sections (4). Alternatively there is the version 9 from 5 sezioni.rnL'ultima digit indicates the series. At the moment we are on the second series (2) proposes that (unlike with version 0 or 1) the monopod. In practice, a leg can be unscrewed and used as monopiede.rnNel kit is offered along with a tripod handy bag, wrist strap and the wooden knob to turn the monopod walking stick (!!!) in addition to the more useful column short and spiked feet as substitutes to the legs of gomma.rnLe legs are reversiblefor a more compact closure and have only 2 point lock opening. Missing the block on opening satin-earth. The leg movement is fluid. The locking knobs are made from rubber, ergonomic but require a crackdown much greater than the Gitzo to firmly hold the sezioni.rnL'ultima section (version 4 sections) of the leg, at least on my copy, it's pretty ballerina. Much more about the version 5 sections (tested in store) .rnLa head is supplied in a virtuous Benro B1.rnCon 230 euro you take home a complete kit and usabilissimo that weighs little and cluttered. sent on August 21, 2014 |
 | Benro B1 Pros: Basic versions Travel Angel, good flow, good construction, Arca plate Cons: The clutch adjustment is almost useless Opinion: As stated in the other hand, the adjustment of the clutch is useless because they are not progressive. In the first few notches does not make any significant friction to the movement of the ball and the last becomes little gradual. In addition, the knob does not maintain its position. It's like a second lock knob (useless) .rnManca progression even the large locking knob. You have to tighten well to block the ball tightly. Manfrotto and Gitzo models, at least from what little I've tried it, they are much more solid (but cost twice as much) .rnPer what it costs (nothing if purchased in conjunction with the Travel Angel Aluminum or Carbon 2682 and 2692) is more than enough for a 7D + 24-105 but also for a 7D + 70-200 or 100-400.rnNon we would support a 500, just to understand, but at that point I would not choose either a Travel Angel.rnSicuramente preferable to head B0. sent on August 21, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Versatile range of focal lengths. Excellent build quality and optics. Tropical conditions. Stabilized Cons: The zoom extends from itself if left alone "dangle". Expensive if not purchased in kit form Opinion: A lens kit for FF which however should not be considered as a "plasticotto" by four money. It 'a lens upgrade (and in fact is an L series). I use it on 7D and, unlike many, I find it a very versatile lens with a focal range that fits very well to my personal needs, even on APSC. Once mounted you tend to leave it on the car and do not ever change it. The stabilizer is great. Forums are talking about a known issue with the flat cable shutter tends to break though this seems to be a common problem with many zoom lenses (eg: Tokina 11-16, Tokina 12-24, Canon 17-85, Canon 18-55 IS and others). sent on May 06, 2013 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Pros: Among this group of 100mm (Canon, Tamron, Tokina, Sigma), has those 5mm more. High definition Cons: AF slow. The transition from AF to MF uncomfortable and messy. Opinion: Is optically excellent lens, like all macro lenses on 100m. The barrel extends during focus (the Canon no). The transition from AF to MF is a little divided: there is the switch that the mode to "pump" (typical of the Tokina). There is "goof up" easily because in the end you have 4 combinations. There is also the limiter MAF even if the motor slow port to use it always and only in manual. The hood is made of metal but it is quite useless because the lens is recessed. The cap does not snap on the hood! The construction is solid, in line with the products Sigma. You can find it used at a good price to start with macros. sent on March 15, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 80-200mm f/4.5-5.6 II Pros: Low cost, lightweight Cons: Plasticky, ring focus away Opinion: A lens without many pretensions, used to market the kits. It is very ergonomic: a ring focus is ridiculous (like Canon EF 50 1.8 II). The image quality is not great but not so bad for a view that you can find on the market (used) for a few euro. It is lightweight (pro) but plasticosissimo (against). It does not give anything to the solid feel but is a good travel companion to battle saw the smallest footprint. sent on March 01, 2013 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX Pros: Solid construction, overall quality, sharpness, f / 4 constant Cons: Flare, focal little extreme ("only" up to 12mm), only APS-C or FF 17mm up. Opinion: Constructively oozes quality and strength from every pore, even in the hood lined in velvet. The focal range is not extreme but covers up to 24mm and can be very useful (eg combining it with a 24-105). The switching between AF / MF is to "pump" and may or may not (like me). Although it is not USM, close enough: fast and silent AF. The point of focus to infinity place at one end of the ferrule can be very useful. The version II with respect to I, for CANON (different speech for Nikon mount instead of the autofocus motor inside), only has an anti-flare add-on, it seems, is not so decisive. Therefore, the version I, in my opinion, is just as attractive as the version II. Moreover, the price of used, it is definitely very affordable. sent on May 07, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price, sharpness, brightness Cons: Soft to 1.8, plastic, etc.. etc.. Opinion: Honestly, that is 50ino plastic, I do not I could care less. Costa yes and no 100 euros and gives a sharpness much higher than the 18-55 kit (I mean the non-IS version ... the only one I tried). For those who are going to buy only one camera and is bled after the disbursement, the 50ino is a lifeline that allows for very little money, to go into the street and shoot! It 's true that suffers from all the flaws described by many before me, but if you go to look at the value (optical) / price is a lens recommended. sent on May 04, 2012 |
 | Canon 350D Pros: It 'a reflex and (now) costs very little Cons: Viewfinder dark, tiny LCD screen, missing LiveView and it is difficult to focus properly in the manual. Opinion: It 's my first and only SLR. Bought for peanuts really giving me a lot of satisfaction because it has made me closer to the world of photography more seriously than it has done so far with the usual compattine. For the moment I feel cramped on the LCD of microscopic dimensions, which together with dark viewfinder and lack of LiveView (as written in the "against"), makes it difficult to MAF manual, but deep down, when photographed on film there ' was no display on which to see the result of the shots, so we can not complain too much. All in all, for what you can pay now, is an Old world purchase for those who want to approach photography with a capital F. sent on February 11, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
