JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon 350D is a reflex camera with APS-C (1.6x) sensor and 8.0 megapixels manufactured from 2005 to 2006 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 1600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 3 FPS x 4 RAW / 14 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 750 €;
40 users have given it an average vote of 8.6 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 195000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:MATERIAL A PLASTICOSO with a tendency to spoil
Opinion:Bought new newly released used a lot even in climatic conditions in which it would have been better to use a TROPICALIZED or semi-tropical reflex such as the Canon EOS 40D and Canon EOS 50D that I purchased later. The quality of the files is excellent, the autofocus is accurate even for action photos (although it is to be preferred Canon EOS 40D or 50D) After about 10 years of use the external machine body has ruined itself at the level of plastics but not at the level of functionality and I had sold it to buy an EOS 500D canon (of which I noticed that by comparison it had less sharpness in the photos in fact replaced again after less than a year for a Canon EOS 100D that I still have). Last year, i regretted selling the Eos 350D and finding one in a photography shop and virtually unused (it had about 1000 shots so perfect) and I bought it back for a short time. I'm still reusing it with a lot of satisfaction.
Cons:It has failed after 10 years of use very intesivo
Opinion:What can I say better than the Canon 350D except that I would have kept it as a life camera if after having martyred in all the manière possible and imaginable: Dai-30 ° of Finland to + 70 ° of the bonnet of the car under the sun of my native Sicily, the rain, the Wind and sand of Brittany, shocks, etc... Climbing on Mount Etna... I was not "successful" to oxidize the motherboard (due to prolonged use in the rain) and make it irreparable for lack of spare parts. It Is a camera that goes to the essential no frills or technical specifications, is used to take pictures like a Nikon F or a Leica M... Compact and light with the zoom 18-55 IS that I strongly recommend (instead of the 18-55 IS not the Kit that sucks) you can always wear ' on ' almost like a compact (I had a bag ready in leather) and the battery is forgotten so hard for a long time. The image quality is excellent, more than enough for any use, with 8mpx I did enlargements 50x70cm. Of an astonishing quality in relation to what I used to realize in analogue (and I was accustomed to a Leica kit) and also compared to the more modern "inflated" cameras of pixels do not disfigure at all. Of Course you have to shoot in Raw to get the best and preferably develop them with DxO that completely transforms the files of 350D, giving it a precision, a fidelity of colors and an absence of unheard of noise for analogue ratio, and that are reclaimed over time To each new version of DxO, with the versions that have the RAW denoise (starting from DxO Optics Pro 9) to at 1600iso has the noise is so moderate and the details so well preserved that one wonders why Canon did not include the ISO 3200as in the 20D which has practically the same s Ensor. The only "nei" of this camera are: 1) The dynamics of the sensor that does not really huge tends to irremediably burn the highlights, I set it with a compensation of the exposure of-1/3 diaffram to remedy, but nevertheless you have to expose with care Even in raw, better to choose the central weighted measure and rely on the "conditioned reflexes" inherited from the analogue. 2) The viewfinder is really unworthy of a reflex, small, dark... Oh My God, you get used to it and it doesn't restrict photographic practice, but you're always dreaming of a better viewfinder (which I found with the 6D that replaced it). 3) The autofocus is extremely precise, I have never had back/front focus problems, but the AF points are too centered, better to use it than the old doing but focusing with the central collimator and then squaring up later. The AF continuous penalty to follow the subjects on the move I ventured to photograph a game of friendly football with good results but it is not made for the sports photo. For Travel and reportage the AF behaves well but for the instant and the Street I often prefer to use it in the ancient manual focusing on the hyperfocal that I marked with a notch on a piece of adhesive on the barrel of the lens to be able to easily Return the notch of the focus ring. So If you have one do not leave it in a drawer, use it can still give big soddifsazioni, but if you want to separate contact me I'll be happy to get rid of... As the saying goes, "The first love is never forgotten."
Pros:It consumes sensor state of the art for the time. Digic processor 2. Compactness. battery life. Extra monochrome dispaly.
Cons:Poor ergonomics, vibration-return mirror, viewfinder, and the small blind, the small screen.
Opinion:My first digital SLR, the time was an epiphany. The still I keep as a souvenir. It represents the historical moment when the dSLR can provide guess quality became accessible to the general pubblico.rnPriva of frills and nonsense but not what you need realmente.rnLa I would also recommend to a beginner wise and all those who approach to digital wisely (or coming from analogue). Watch out for those who have big hands: better to aim to 30d that does not cost that much more expensive.
Pros:General features, monochrome display on the cover (abandoned since the 400d)
Cons:nobody, considered age and location
Opinion:He solved the many problems of the 300D. He gave the same - excellent - the coeval 30D sensor. It was the last - in the category - with monochrome display on the cover, then abandoned by the 400D. Purchased today, it is for beginners who are early connoisseurs. Why s'avvederanno than it's worth, on the field, a design wisdom.
Cons:Used so the only decent center AF point, the noise over 800iso, limited dynamic range, color rendering by bad 800iso on, monitor baby. Missing function AutoISO. The viewfinder seems the peephole of a door than a fullframe, but I see that the 700d my partner has not changed much.
Opinion:It was my car for 10 years, I bought new in 2005 and still use. I passed a lot of the 200,000 shots and is mirror shutter still work fine. RNLA I used in the snow, the sun, the sea, the rain, and despite not being Tropicalised did not give me problems. I am extremely happy with our purchase and I will always keep with me, even when I pass in fullframe. RNLA recommend anyone wishing to approach the Photography to learn and grow.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
