|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcofiorini www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcofiorini  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X100T Pros: Dimensions and weight sensor, look. Cons: Lens, ring back, no ISO dial, ring focus, aids for the manual focus, high ISO. Opinion: It's not the car that I expected reading reviews online. Positive that he is small, lightweight, and you can carry it wherever you want without obligation. The files are very good, really excellent regarding colors and recoveries in the shadows. The thing I most appreciate in the machine, however, is the range finder, it's fun and it's another way to shoot. See off the frame framed by more chance in certain types of photography, although it is not easy all'inizio.rnNell'uso practical I found the lens very soft at f2 (by my standards), already at f2.8 is fine. .and I want to clarify that I am not a picky so much on those things there. For goodness sake, it is very small and light, but it is not an excuse because 1) must cover only one size aps-c, 2) is f2, f1.4 not. Go see the size of Leica 35mm f2 and 35mm f1.4 voigtlander parliamo.rnGli then we are good high ISO up to 1600, then the files are mushy. In the reviews are all enthusiastic high iso, inIndeed, it is difficult to see grain, but honestly I prefer to see a file recorded and noisy, very, rather than have a photo without a trace of grit and all crushed and mixed. No no no. Noise reduction in -2.rnVisto which is a machine and fixed lens rangefinder, it would be nice to use it in manuale..vista and considered the cabal pulling on the various fotografoni sponsored by Fuji on the implementation of creativity as a result of the limitation of freedom. .Ecco, the "broken line" is not really the top, having used the old crescents Nikon and Leica rangefinders. It 'hard to use especially on more complex images. The peak focusing can not be used with the rangefinder and immaginina bottom right in the viewfinder that zooms in the central part of the frame is very small to evaluate the focus on speed and above all I find it difficult to compose well with distraente..già telemetro..rnOltretutto, the focus ring to focus the lens, almost infinite, is little braking. Even Volendo work in hyperfocal walking sooner or later touches you and you disgraced the focus. It 'a moment. rnUltima thing, the ring back, which in manual mode is used to change the shutter speed (even if you have already set on the bezel just above) is mollissima and unrestrained, with jerky little perceptible. The consequence is that once you set the exposure and backed the car to the belly, just a couple of steps because the wheel from turning independently and you change the exposure. And if that were not enough, the wheel is positioned right where my thumb rests during shooting. I solved it by covering it with scotch.rnLa machine is great fun and files, all things considered. But it would be nice that someone super fotografoni pecking the ding from Fuji had written at least one of the things I listed prima..rnrnAh, if you think it might be an alternative to the Leica, not è.rn sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Sharp already in print at f1.4, very sharp from f2.8 even when the monitor is small and lightweight, nice bokeh, nice colors, cheap. Cons: Distortion is not a bolt of AF but there's much worse, I did not understand what it is weather resistant. Opinion: And 'one of my favorite lenses even though my standard focal length is 35mm. Many complain about the sharpness at room temperature and in effect to monitor is not excellent, but I must say that in print (30x45, 12mp, 300dpi) the results are excellent. The problem then is caught fire saw the perfect little profondità.rnIn hand feels that the barrel and plastic, but overall not a feeling of fragility, it is also very light and this is a huge honor for those who travel or keeps the car several hours in the neck. The af is not instantaneous but I've never had any problems or missed shots, and often work with very little luce.rnProbabilmente is not the best 50mm ever made, but for 300 Euros which is the new offers brightness, sharpness more than good for those who print and not only see the pictures on the monitor, the reasonably fast af, lightweight but strong, pleasant tones and bokeh. sent on November 28, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: Sharpness, colors, construction. Cons: AF is not very fast, and small hood ridiculous, VR whistles, weight, cost. Opinion: It has a yield indisputable and is very robust, so professionally speaking is the best choice. The lens hood makes me laugh a little and are not sure of its effectiveness due to its size. In my example the VR blows for a while .. no really, and the af is not the fastest on D700. Before I had the canon f2.8 smooth and was faster. rnPesa a lot and at the end of a workday generally I find myself to hate it because it destroyed me back and neck, but the results are excellent in terms of color reproduction, sharpness and effectiveness of VR.rnSe it cost a little less would be almost perfect! sent on August 18, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Sharpness, colors, brightness, resistance to weathering. Cons: Dimensions with lens hood grafted on the contrary. Opinion: They have already written so much and I can quote just about everyone. The lens is sharp, fast, has great colors, is always reliable in terms of yield. The construction is more than enough for the type of use that I do (professional photographer but not a mason .. I never planted the nails). rnIl hood, when engaged in reverse to put the lens greatly increases the diameter and sometimes makes it difficult to fit into any backpack a bit smaller: in the lowepro flipside 400 AW I can not put the 70-200 and this with both barndoors because otherwise I squeeze the remaining space .. rnPer the rest, the best medium zoom Nikon. sent on August 18, 2013 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, color, fantastic bokeh for a 35mm, price, also well balanced on pro bodies, three-dimensional (that does not depend only on the lens), fast AF. Cons: It looks like a tank but it is poorly constructed. Opinion: After replacing the AF motor AD Service, the goal is very fast in focus and extremely precise and steady. The sharpness is very good at f1.4 (considering opening), it is from f2.8 (eye) maybe in a bit more engraved 24-70 and 20-200 VRII. The colors are full enough, a hair more than the new Nikon Nano Crystal. The bokeh is soft and creamy, not at all nervous. EDIT: Besides being arrived without AF (first intervention ...), I have loosened the screws holding the bayonet until I was in the mountains (after less than two years of use). Now, 12 February 2016 - 3 years, the goal has just returned back from assistance to an assembly problem. In essence they were "unglued" component and the lens was beginning to have a game ... in practice it seemed that the lens was opening up in two just before the start of the opaque part of the barrel. Here, I use lenses that much more of this, and for the longest time and they are perf ...ette, without a sign ... never happened to me stuff like that with the new Nikon "plasticky". He with old Nikon Ais mistreated on the stock exchange prior to my father and then to me. In 3 years: AF broken bayonet comes off, barrel which opens in half. good build quality? Come on ... sent on April 12, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
