|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Carlo Simari www.juzaphoto.com/p/CarloSimari  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 1.4x TC WR Pros: WR, AF, human price! Cons: Not yet found. Opinion: Small and light, it brings me 100-400 to an 840mm F8 equivalent focal point and it's not a thing! RnThe blur remains beautiful! The autofocus does not seem to lose anything, loses only the stabilizer efficiency that that focal length would ask Too many miracles! RnRimane the problem of working over 800mm is never easy and requires at least one monopod, with a good stand and a bit of experience you can get great photos! RnPostero soon of the photos.rn sent on June 16, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: OVERVIEW STABILIZER! 5m AF lock, unlocking the diaphragm ring in the car position, hinges with a polarizer window, not too bulky. Cons: Not a little foot and little else for now, I use it for a few days! Opinion: It seems to me better than other Fuji optics, at least with regard to the structure and coating that even on the body of the XT-1 leaves it to be desired! The diaphragm ring of other Fuji (23sample!) Does not provide a lock in the automation position and often moves to be particularly soft, but instead have a dedicated button (such as 10-24 and 18-135) on insertion Of the ring on the optic or the one on the body "A" .nn The hood, which has always been a defect of the Fuji, in this case seems well with a release button, hooks up well and easily and provides the window to rotate the Polarizer filter.rn Optical quality I think it's not arguable and it's not up to me to judge it, with the XT-1 doing well and with the xt-2 it does its utmost for autofocus! Rnrn PAZZESCO STABILIZER! ... I tried to 400mm with a 1/10 second time at a distance of about 20m and the picture was perfect! I still do not know how well it loses a lot of quality but I have evaluated that at long distances (in particular cOn the 1,4x teleconverter) on the tripod the photo with the stabilizer is kneaded! At 840mm, I think it's understandable! RnTo use at close distances like in the macro (it has a minimal focus on the eye!) Or for portrait over 10m is very useful! RnrnI am very satisfied and will add any considerations in the use if it is appropriate! sent on May 22, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm X-M1 Pros: Dimensions and weight, quality, even at high ISO, tilting LCD, price (used by then!) Cons: Delicate (maybe it's just a feeling), creative filters only program dedicated autofocus just enough (from September 2015 you can do the update!), Lack of viewfinder. Opinion: I bought it used from Silver58, was as new color Quoio with its 16-50 kit, a positive surprise, I did not believe that with 300 € you could find a toy like this! RnSicuramente not a machine sports photo or birds but it is the ideal object to bring always behind! RNLA quality, even with the optics of the kit, it is already excellent, dynamic range and good seal is satisfactory up to 6400 ISO, up to 1600 is crazy! rnCome other sisters that use the same sensor and processor! rnCi takes patience, delicacy and once you get used to the ergonomics Lilliputian. rnHo immediately bought for about 35,00euro lens adapter for Pentax k with 50 1/7 in MF are masterpieces, allowing patience. For manual focus it has an attractive and effective system for confirming! RnNon may be the main machine but it's definitely a nice toy to have for any occasion sent on June 17, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
