RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Mtdbo
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mtdbo



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Mtdbo


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

samsung_s21ultraSamsung S21 Ultra

Pros: Turns on

Cons: Excessive cost, only 2 cameras usable in pro mode (not telephotos), provides RAW only in pro mode (and therefore no RAW with telephoto lenses), trivial camera management software

Opinion: Being in a photography forum I analyze the photographic sector, for the rest this phone works like any other phone: fast having fast processors, after all you pay a bang, we would miss it as well. From him I expected much more from the photographic part of which he is very proud in advertising. It is actually very limited due to indecent software to say the least. I chose it because I expected to have RAW files to use, as described in features but, due to software, it only provides RAW for the first two lenses: ultra wide and wide, not for telephoto lenses. In addition, in pro mode you can only use those two lenses, not telephoto lenses. The limitation is frankly stunning in a phone of this cost, especially unacceptable and I do not think it is documented anywhere. Had I known that I simply wouldn't have bought it. Now, a year after the release Samsung is working on a software that solves this indecency, for now it is in beta and downloadable only as an apk: Expert RAW, demonstrating that the limitation is not technical but software. Samsung has made the figure of the perecottaro and I strongly advise thing assured the purchase

sent on November 27, 2021


tamron_70-200_f2-8vc_g2Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2

Pros: Stabilization, AF, anti-glare, sharpness, 10 year warranty

Cons: Lightweight lens hood. Very easy to disable the focus by mistake.

Opinion: Very fast focus, very little distortion. The stabilizer is amazing, it acts quickly and allows you to use it at unthinkable times and to contain the ISO. In the box, unlike what happened to others, I found a soft bag and a hexagon to screw two latches on the tripod mount; The collar is ARCA SWISS compatible. No type of problem with fire accuracy so no front or back focus (but does it really exist in the real world? Never seen in any of my lenses). The sharpness seems to me excellent for my needs; I do not know the various Nikkor 70-200, but with the money saved I see clearly an incoming vacation. Aesthetically beautiful but cares. Very criticizable the hood, of course plastic, but very light: I hope it does not break. EDIT: I update the review after several months of use to add that I often inadvertently disabilities the autofocus or the stabilizer because the buttons on the barrel are right at your fingertips. Very useful thing but to be very careful. Before I knew it I often barreled the focus

sent on December 04, 2017


lowepro_protactic450awLowepro ProTactic 450 AW

Pros: Possibility to reach the equipment in 4 different ways. Compatible with MOLLE system. Belt. sufficiently protective

Cons: limiting the division system. top opening there is not the D750 + 24-120 with hood. The belt is related to the part that opens on the back and thus can not open the backpack without rest on the ground

Opinion: I wanted a backpack that would allow me to access at least two goals (14-24 and 300 E PF) from the sides to change goal without putting the bag when they are in the midst of campi.rnInteressante able to access on both sides of the objectives for running changes . Unfortunately, the upper opening refelx with 24-120 + lens hood does not fit and therefore one of the two openings is sacrificed by reflex. rnIl dividing system provides a large aperture in half bag that prevents you to customize the internal division in a manner optimal for me. The two side openings are generous for optical inutilizzato.rnBene but this leaves the pocket PC space, the upper space for some accessori.rnPERFETTA the belt that can hold small items, a "portaqualcosa" LOWEPRO or the MOLLE system and download great weights on great fianchirnQuasi

sent on December 05, 2016


manfrotto_tracolla_zaino_grande_ma_bp_tlManfrotto Tracolla e zaino grande (MB MA-BP-TL)

Pros: Hybrid Backpack, contains a 15.6 "PC, rain cover, good photo material capacity

Cons: Closure of the really demented photographic department (but great to fit the left hand side), feeling of low lens protection in the lower department, not excellent capacity and which could be better seen in total footprints

Opinion: I honestly do not know if I will resume it: the D750 with 24-120 enters between the two laptops only without hood, there are two lenses in the vertical but only on the lower side, the one most affected by the backpack. In the upper department, the targets are moving us to the compartment of personal objects, giving us a sense of precariousness in the protection. The 2-Zip closure is really absurd: to take the material on the opposite side, you have to open all the photo compartment Road, with the shoulder bag, is not really the ultimate in safety. But it's customizable for leftovers. Finally, I think that this big backpack has a lot of wasted space but is comfortable because it can be used both as a backpack and as a single shoulder

sent on May 18, 2016


lowepro_nova_sport_35l_awLowepro Nova Sport 35L AW

Pros: good materials, easily organized inside, high and then calmly contains a 80-200 vertically. Many side pockets and in the front flap, cloth anti rain, the second shoulder strap for convenient hand-carry it instead to shoulder, conveniently the possibility of extracting the entire equipment compartment, for pocket PC (maximum 14 ")

Cons: fully loaded very thinking but it was from attenderselo from a bag so large, it "transforms" too easily.

Opinion: is a bag especially for material transport from place to place, not suited to carry it always follows an excursion town, unthinkable for off-road course. This is due to the fact that the shoulder at the end is felt very much, because from full load is very heavy. If half-empty estate, then it is better a smaller bag and less voluminous. I use it mainly as a container for all my camera equipment from which to take off caught in a time that I need, or take it with me when you ride in the car and travel on foot are very limited, or rather one zaino.rn

sent on May 18, 2016


nikon_d750Nikon D750

Pros: ISO, good distribution of the controls, autofocus, in short, almost everything including the pivoting monitor and angers so much who does not possess it.

Cons: Three calls !! tilting monitor only horizontally

Opinion: I have the D750 for more than one year and I am fine. Easily customizable, with all the pros above. The sensor is the sony by 24 and is well known for the recovery capacity of the shadows. The main defect is that Nikon has made a big mess with the shutter that required 2 + 1 calls for an abnormal reflection in backlight but negligible in most cases. Bad shape! Which added to other recent begin to be "a test". A further improvement could be the movable monitor in all directions as the 5xxx series to shoot from awkward positions also in the vertical. I have no proof but I am afraid that the overhead monitor can be the Achilles heel for the perfect weather sealing. I do not care if it rains because I'm under the covers. Recommended (but not with the 24-120 f.4)

sent on April 09, 2016


nikon_24-120vr_f4Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR

Pros: Handyman covering many important focal, fast and silent AF.

Cons: High price for a handyman, vignetting very obvious, such as distortion, which involves a lot of correction in Camera Lucida

Opinion: Taken as a kit with the D750. I thought, considering the price of optics if purchased separately, it was better. The vignetting is very strong to 24mm in particular with focus to infinity and present at all focal lengths. The closure of the diaphragm solves only in part. PP is resolved but I think this reduces the quality of the edges of the corrected image. Distortion is important for wide-angle and TA. My impression is that Nikon has deliberately forced the aim to overcome their competitors in terms of numbers to put on the box vendita.rnOvviamente on DX improves (or there are fewer defects because the edges are excluded from the sensor) but at that point you lose the wide angle, it is worth considering the cost? rnIl weight not cheap but very tolerable replacing the strap of the standard SLR with a wrapping machine on fianco.rnLo buy back? I'm not sure

sent on January 09, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me