|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabio291067 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fabio291067  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samsung S22 Ultra Pros: Excellent cameras and valid digital zoom algorithm. Cons: Grip not always easy for thin bezels and ultra-wide angle very close to the edge Opinion: Always faithful to the Galaxy Note series (1, 4 and 8), I have never appreciated the photographic sector. Not that I pretended to replace the mirrorless, but that it was a decent forklift for emergencies, this yes. Finally this S22 Ultra (which in fact replaces the Note series) has cameras and software suitable for a top of the range: excellent the main, really wide angle of the ultra-wide angle, good optical zoom, and effective processing of 10X, much more detailed than the simple crop on 3X. The focus of the ultra-wide angle is a few millimeters, so that even pseudomacros are successful. Significantly improved automatic white balance. Superlative backlight tightness: minimal ghost images and excellent legibility of shaded areas. The effectiveness of the night mode is impressive, but above all the yellow dominant has disappeared from the night photos, which characterized the shots of my previous Galaxy. In conclusion, a perfect and versatile photographic sector. Shots so good that it could be difficult to create a creative photograph without filters and working only with jpg. It is useful to apply a cover in rubbery material, which is a bit thick and rigid, to improve the grip, and which has a sliding protection for the objectives. sent on October 18, 2022 |
 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Detail at the remarkable center (even at the extreme Tele), versatility, solid mechanical construction, limited protrusion of the barrel to the maximum tele Cons: Brightness (but for that there are the fixed), detail in the suburbs (but that you can ask for more at a handyman zoom?) Opinion: Here he is here in my hands this handyman Buietto, which so little enthusiasm aroused at the time of the announcement. In fact, the numerical characteristics do not tickle the most impelled fantasies of the amateur (f 3.5 to 18 mm, but then just put your hand on the zoom ring to see the entire upper right away), but you also have to consider the general role of This lens. Taken in hand the 18-135 from an idea of solidity and construction well realized. It seems sturdier than the ultra-light Zeiss 16-70, not so much for the heavier weight (however well balanced on the A6500) as for the good feeling it returns by rotating the focal ring. Rotation all in all limited, since in a quarter turn you move from maximum wide to maximum tele. Of reflection also the elongation of the barrel is limited; Even null until 24mm! Very convenient (for those who use it) the AF-MF switch button on the lens. For me this zoom replaces the Zeiss 16-70, which I greatly appreciated, but which I always used as a travel handyman. Handyman for handyman, better one with greater excursion and that maybe allow to leave at home even the 55-210. The only perplexity was the surrender regarding contrast and tightness to the backlight, but sincerely in these very first releases, I did not notice any glaring differences. Also with regard to the definition I think two similar objectives: detailed in the center and much softer in the periphery. Of the 18-135 I was favourably impressed with the surrender even to the extreme tele. In the end I am well satisfied with the change and versatility of this 18-135. sent on June 17, 2018 |
 | Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness throughout the frame, contrast Cons: You pay for Opinion: His Majesty Sony-Zeiss 24mm f1.8rnIl best lens for APS-C mirrorless Sony. The sharpness in the center as the corners is impressive. The contrast and saturation are as you would expect from a Zeiss lens with blue label. The excellent build quality and simple and elegant design (when I spend several hundred euro I demand that the lens is good, too). More favors impeccably the fast autofocus of the A6300 and A6500. sent on February 07, 2017 |
 | Sony E 20mm f/2.8 Pros: Size and weight of the primacy Cons: overall yield Opinion: You can not expect from a pancake the quality of a portrait lens? Of course not, and in fact some are the qualities of this little guy. Lightweight and compact first, then versatility. Yes, versatility, because the focus is the right one to do a bit 'of everything, from street to landscapes, portraits ambientati to photos with friends and relatives. Plus it's compatible with specific additional two that amplify use in wide sense. In short, while also having his majesty Zeiss 24mm, I often choose it for informal outputs: is the right fixed for "casul photography". sent on February 06, 2017 |
 | Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Pros: Versatility, build quality, size and weight, overall yield Cons: high price, sharpness at the edges Opinion: It is a versatile zoom, make saturated colors, holds well against the light, it weighs little, perfectly favors the autofocus mirrorless Sony and has an excellent yield in the middle. The sides falls? Well, patience, "not only sharpness at the edges live optics". rnih conclusion I would say that for daily use, travel, documentary, is an excellent zoom, but it is not suitable to replace fixed perspective in fine-art prints. sent on February 06, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
