|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Brontolo83 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Brontolo83  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon G1X Mark III Pros: Compact, lightweight, quality, customizable, handy, image quality. Cons: Not received Opinion: Hello everyone! The camera is very compact and manageable, with many customizations, solid, it's in a pocket or a pouch! The camera churns out very nice files and just works little little to get great results, side shooting I do not use it, so I do not express myself. The features of the product are practically the same as a high-end reflex, the optics is more like an optical kit but with F/2.8 on the wide-angle side, ultra compact and closing a little crisp. The customizations are many and interesting, and make your camera YOUR! The battery lasts little, I did not put it between the cons as it is a known feature before the purchase. I recommend it to those who want to stay light and are ready to settle for a handyman goal, suitable for making landscapes, portraits, excursions. I haven't tried it because they're not genres that interest me. Always ready to shoot! Highly recommended! Vote 10! sent on April 08, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, brightness. Cons: X me none. Opinion: I have this slow recently, quindo consider this judgment upgradeable later, as soon as I mastered completamente.rnPremetto that my yardstick is the kit lens 18-55 IS STM; this lens is excellent, quite another thing! Now I understand the concept of brightness! It 's the best lens I owned or used, the first results were excellent! I still have to take the hand as to f / 2.8 the depth of field is very narrow and I have yet to get used to it! What can I say .... Excellent! Surely there are better type the L series or fixed but for my budget and my needs is Excellent! sent on August 08, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: sharp in the middle, light, fast, stable Cons: sharpness at the edges not excellent, it lacks the lens hood, annoying flare, plastic bayonet. Opinion: If you are a landscaper or if you try new angles and new perspectives obiettivio this for you. Demands attention in the use as enough estremo.rnNon is suitable for those who want to split hairs with the sharpness or those seeking a luminosa.rnPer slow a bit 'I used Canon EOS 750D and it's really exciting especially if you have already found your kind words ambientati landscape or portraits or to experiment with new ideas .rn2 in: did not include the hood, the bayonet is plastic. Specifically, the plastic bayonet is a shame because it is a particular objective and at least one non paste it to the camera, you can easily wear out. sent on May 09, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Sharp, light, silent, fast, great stabilizer. For me a valid Zoom. Great as KIT. Cons: It would be even better if they made a 15-70 of equal quality. The hood is missing. Opinion: UPDATE OF 09/06 / 2017.rn My best goal, as far as I'm concerned, better than 17-55 f / 2.8. My copy is NITIDA, it loses a hair towards the left but negligible edge. Live View from the best of it. And it does not look a bit short, it's also light! UPDATE UPDATE Used on Canon EOS 750D. It's a good handyman, easy to use and quality. I tried the following kit lenses: 18-55 IS II, 18-55 III and sony 16-50 oss (when I had the alpha 5100). RnrnE 'the best kit i've ever used! Better than previous versions, some are really scarce! And even better than Sony's competition. The clearest I've ever tried! For me also the canon ef-s 10-18 IS STM.rnOnly the NITIDEZZA is pleasantly SILENT and fast in AF, the STABILIZER is really OPTIMAL! And I have no firm hand! I'm happy for those who want to be light and do a little bit of everything without big pretensions. RUNNING OF 09/06 / 2017.rn My best goal, as far as I'm concerned, better than 17-55 f / 2.8. My copIa is NITIDA, he loses a hair towards the left but negligible edge. Live View from the best of it. And I look no sooner, it's also light! sent on April 21, 2016 |
 | Canon 750D Pros: AF system, software, setting shooting parameters. Cons: Software. Opinion: 01/07/2016, following the first impressions of about a month of tests. Before I used a ML and I thought that the differences were few, and instead I changed my mind, a whole other world. The AF SYSTEM is really great, the thing that most impressed me! With the viewfinder I can do everything and I are already pleasantly accustomed, and I probably could not do without it, even the good AF in live view chasing soggetto.rnSe using the viewfinder, the screen has all of TRIGGER PARAMETERS and then it allows you to have everything under control! The setting is manual touch is great! RnIl SOFTWARE and the menus are well organized and you can create favorites, conversely missing some settings, for example, the ability to automatically create a daily folder on the SD card on other less expensive cars is presente.rnNota sore BATTERY when it passes by 3 notches (max) 2 notches is already almost over [[UPDATE 08/05/2016: using the viewfinder only, and not constantly change settings you can pull another 200 scacts and even more gods! The first notch lasts an eternity, however, at least a hearty day over 1000 pictures taken.] RnInfine occasionally feel the PLASTICS not of the highest quality, a flaw recently! [UPDATE 08/05/2016: plastics will be bedded as always happens less often!] sent on January 07, 2016 |
 | Sony A5100 Pros: A camera in your pocket! RNE 'compact, lightweight and can you take of all, after reading the tutorial sony produces files ready for those who can post-produce, saturated colors, beautiful portraits and landscapes in incredible detail or another, some photos are baked at SLR Professional. Cons: Button some more help to accelerate the selection of the parameters of the scene; good battery but if you play with the settings falls quickly. Opinion: =========================> Update 07/01/2016 ================= ==> rnun good start in photography, good quality in most occasions but in situations of changes in temperature and pressure has annoying malfunzionamenti.rnAgli beginning easy to handle and intuitive (almost like a compact camera) but it eventually proved impractical , extensive use of menus and submenus for minor adjustments; too many sacrifices than an SLR, too few optical native! rnSostituita with REFLEX. <======================= RnPremetto that come from a compact camera, which means that I was used all'inquadra and snaps. Never used or ML.rnQuesta SLR camera, in the early days I was left with a bitter taste, I thought arrogantly that enough 2 pictures and I mastered the product and instead I found that the blur, blur and unwanted noise were behind the angle always in my PROVISIONSI, even when not required! rnPoi calmly, I read a bit 'of documentation Sony and ... show! rnrnSforna photo ready! rn- Landscapes (my specialty) with vivid bright colors, always in focus where appreciate the detail and depth, subjects disconnected, photos do not flatter. rn- Portraits (my pet peeve) are outstanding, I have yet to figure out some parameters but I baked the very nice pictures that will satisfy even the models more 'demanding (my girlfriend is quite picky and critical :-P) and without having to resort to Photoshop, soft skin, blurred background, eyes clearly focused and detailed as you like me.rn- Flowers in focus, bright, dettagliati.rn- animals, some difficulties to follow but that detail, the hair, the musetti sympathetic eyes ... there is no comparison with the 16-50 kit prima.rnrnCon I cut down all the limits that I had with my compattina.rnSono managed to get pictures of my cat where each hair has stood out, photos of flowers in focus with a decenyou blurred background and photos with various effects choppy water and a first controlled experiment of night wake limits .... All that I was close with the compact camera precedente.rnrnPer now the only limit are found pictures at night without tripod but here I think it's hard x anyone (also according to documents found online). However if you do not have a tripod and steady hands it is difficult to capture a photo clean and kelp, however the automatic in this machine produces excellent file ... and save the serata.rnCome physical limits of the machine I found the batteries if you play a bit 'is short ... I will have to provide for an extra battery. It would also be useful to have some extra button to customize and facilitate more frequenti.rnrnConsigliatissima x all kinds of users! sent on April 03, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
