|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcoss www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcoss  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD Pros: Sharpness, weight, size, price-quality ratio, T-a details. Cons: Platyly Lens hood, flare in backlight difficult to handle, evident vignetting at T.A. Opinion: I replaced the Zeiss 24-70 F4 with this lens, both for opening and for the yield of detail, higher than all focal lengths. The Zeiss remains superior in backlight, where the flare is virtually absent. The Tamron is perfect in travel considering the reduced weight and the ability to return, even in critical conditions with little light, great shots. Combined with the stabilized sensor of the A7III is perfect. The blur in the portraits at TA is appreciable, even if not properly ' creamy '. Given the price and the undisputed qualities I consider it a great all to do for the Sony A7. Autofocus slightly below the Zeiss 24-70. sent on February 19, 2019 |
 | Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Pros: clear (even at ta), lightweight, highly competitive price, light (2.0 f), pleasant and without nuts games, very beautiful colors, perfect for my Sony Alpha 6000 Cons: given the price I would say nothing (maybe in my version the indication of fire to the infinite is not very accurate) Opinion: I took it in 2014 without much conviction, not having, at the time, familiarize yourself with the manual lenses. Now I can reassure the fans autofocus, in this view is an option very useful. At this focal length, closing a little 'the diaphragm, just adjust the focus to infinity to always have the sharpness of a few centimeters / meters from the lens (already f5 1 m onwards everything is in focus) .The focus function camera peaking will help if you serve composing with large apertures. Now, even changing the camera body, I made it a habit not to use auto focus with wide-angle lenses. RNE 'humorous perspective that can give you a lot of satisfaction, both day and night. For those who love the views and want to travel light, is the ideal complement to the classic zoom standard.rnIn summary, the value for money is great and if you scare the price of sel 10-18, this view is the one foryou. sent on December 04, 2016 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: It has all the controls within easy reach, broad optical park, large display, good burst and discreet autofocus even with critical light, the raw files are well workable, good memory buffer Cons: Display fixed, some commands annoy me (option use the remote control to insert each time) and little else. Opinion: I had the d5000 and Sony Alpha 6000 (which still use when I want to travel light). The lack of swivel the display and the weight they initially left me somewhat puzzled, but with time I then enjoyed the many positive sides. The first is certainly the layout of the controls (there is rarely need to access the menu to change important operating parameters, dials and buttons are highly functional). Another aspect that I consider important is the memory buffer (if you shoot at night in raw with sony you have a fairly long time to wait before the operation returns camera after the closure of the shutter) and autofocus, fast and powerful even in light conditions criticism. Finally, the optical park, really wide and unmatched in price performance ratio (even canon no joke). As for the sensor I have not noticed great progress compared to the alpha 6000, change some colors and I noticed a slight better grip at high ISO. In conclusion, in the 7200 dx it has few rivals today, after the purchase I assure you will have few regrets. L I have youfor now it was mostly at night and so far it has not disappointed me. In short a nice holiday for the baptism of fire. Good light at all! sent on December 01, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
