JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2018. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (Stepper Motor), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 699 €;
61 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 201000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Stumbled into a defective specimen in focus and communication with the camera, I wait for the replacement after needlessly sending it into assistance (the problems remained so and such)
Opinion:Unfortunately I stumbled upon a specimen with several problems, from the autofocus that in AFC pumps without finding fire and in AFS often produces blurry images, not to mention the management of the diaphragm that practically always works at full opening... In addition, the camera (Sony A7R3) fails to communicate with the lens and therefore does not automatically correct the heavy vignette. Sent for service in June through the store in Trieste where it was purchased, I was returned at the end of August with the same problems that it had at the origin. A way of doing care that is truly unqualified. Now I have asked the retailer to replace it with a working model, I was told that they turned the request over to the distributor (Polyphoto). I wait a few more days then I will have to enforce the ex art guarantee clauses against the store. 130 of the Consumer Code.
Cons:in a low light condiz sometimes the af doesn't hook
Opinion:This lens I think is great from all points of view, especially for the cost it has and considering the competition for sony optics. the sharpness is very high, I use it without problem for portraits even at 70mm 2.8 and everything is very sharp even at TA. as mentioned in the pros sometimes I struggle a little to focus in low light conditions, but it happens a few times and with very little luke available. The only thing, however, that I'm not sure about and I should do tests comparing it with other f2.8 optics, is that sometimes it seems unluminous to be 2.8. Let me explain better: in a certain light condition, setting a certain coupled diaphragm/time/iso seems to enter less light than other f2.8 optics, but it is not a test that I did actually but simply remembering the various optics used.
Pros:Efficient and quiet autofocus, sharpness, value for money
Cons:Considering the price and the category of which it is part, I would say none. In an absolute sense maybe those 4 mm on the wide angle that you sometimes miss.
Opinion:A beautiful lens, practical and multipurpose (and we would miss it, is a zoom 28-75 2.8..). In general very good image quality. What does not drive me crazy is the ring of manual fire, I would prefer that there was more step between this and the plastic of the barrel, it would certainly be more ergonomic, plus it is really "tight", otherwise it flows quite well. As for the AF, however, nothing really to criticize, it's really good, at least on a7iii. One flaw of my specimen(?) is that over time, the use of zooming (in practice a "vacuum cleaner effect" can bring in tiny grains of dust from the bayonet side that settle on the back of the 2nd front lens. I solved by dismantling the front lenses and cleaning them, but of course you have to be very careful especially if you are not familiar, in that case better to bring it into assistance. For this reason I recommend avoiding using the zoom dial if the lens does not have a rear cap or if it is not mounted on the machine.
Cons:Unpainted plastic prone to scratches, soft at the edges at 28mm. A little overprizzo. Very sharp but without excelling.
Opinion:Interesting optics if you do not want to weigh down the bag. Beautiful colors, emphasizes greens and yellows, the complexion is correct and pleasant. Overall the images are pleasant. I confirm that it is a good optics, it cost a little less for what it offers. I do not add anything else because on the internet everything has been said and the opposite of everything, between youtubbber and last-minute reviewers.
Opinion:I'm going to go a little against the tide. Definitely attractive price for the characteristics of the optics, but the realization in terms of construction quality frankly is from the lens "cheap" and I am very sorry. Being used to the classic L Canon series armored cars, but also some Tamrons for DSLR, this lens looks like a cheap toy, paid for rather expensively. Everything that has impressed me negatively with regard to the construction, is instead repaid by the optical quality and autofocus, both very good. Autofocus fast and very quiet, so much so that it is recommended to be used also in the video field... Good image quality, sometimes very good, good rendering of colors and details, even at full opening says its, despite present a blurry 2.8 that sometimes does not convince me... I definitely want to recommend it, it's a great all-rounder's optics for those who don't want to faint. It has a minimal distance of interesting focus even for macro shots. It enjoys the usual Tamron warranty extension, which I consider a bonus not to be underestimated. Overall I promote it, waiting to evaluate its duration over time. Vote 9.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
