|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Apollo79 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Apollo79  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic S1 Pros: Ergonomics, high iso hold, colors, dual xqd and sd slots, battery Cons: Weight but relatively Opinion: Recently taken to replace the Sony a7iii and for this reason I write what are my impressions and my comparisons to bring out the differences between brands a little more popular and others more mistreated ..... First held iso: if in this area the Sony a7iii could say its the Panasonic Lumix S1 goes even further.... I shot at an opera concert in Milan at 12,800 iso with more or less the same noise that the a7iii had at about 8,000 iso. A truly incredible hold as well as a greater color hold. Ergonomics: we don't really talk about it... it looks like a glove and having had a G9 I found the same arrangement of buttons, of course it is heavier than the a7iii but the greater ergonomics does not make me feel it too much weight. Viewfinder: even here that we talk about doing, the comparison is merciless, as well as going beyond the license plate data the colors of the viewfinder of the s1 are very natural. Video functions: even here the comparison is merciless, Panasonic wins big and with a much better stabilizer. Battery: here the Sony certainly does better but not so much, but it must be said that the battery of the s1 is larger as mah so here Panasonic must improve. Video functions: even here the comparison is merciless, the S1 wins great and with a much better stabilizer. Autofocus: if we talk about single autofocus the S1 does better and the photos in focus with the contrast system are really in focus while with the a7iii sometimes I happened to have photos not perfectly in focus; in continuous autofocus my impression is that there is more precision in tracking the eye / faces in Panasonic rather than in Sony where the Sony certainly has more speed and shooting cadence. As well as in tracking animals or subjects in rapid movement here Sony wins but for these areas I'm waiting for the s5ii just announced that seems to work wonders. Concisely..... being more or less at the same price new I would think about which one to buy, in my case I preferred the S1 after a few months with the a7iii, certainly the compatible lens park for Sony is wider but that for Lmount is expanding rapidly thanks above all to Sigma. sent on January 22, 2023 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG 12-60mm f/2.8-4.0 ASPH OIS Pros: construction, feeling of solidity, colors, stabilization, tropicalization, possibility of mounting circular screw filters Cons: f2.8 only at 12mm Opinion: Optic that transmits solidity in everything; beautiful to see and to have in hand; very cured; only if only f2.8 is only 12mm then they mannore that the focal length increases the aperture closes but keeping in mind the fabulous dualIS2 it suits the hunger of brightness with much slower times than other cameras where this stabilization is absent; I compared it with the Panasonic 12-35 f2.8 first version and I have to say that at equal conditions and therefore also diaphragm (panalei was at f.3.5 or f4 obviously the 12-35 was with diaphragm at the same aperture ) 12-60 photos were slightly brighter especially in shadow areas; these were in fact much more "legible" in 12-60; colors much more faithful than 12-60 than with 12-35 (always in JPEG as RAW can work in post) in short, it seemed to me that Leica imprint is also visible to cameramen like myself and therefore not professionals; Stabilization works well with both the small gx80 and theGH5, not to mention videos that with the electronic stabilizer seem to be turned on a tripod. Drawing sums vote 9.5 sent on September 22, 2017 |
 | Pentax K-3 II Pros: Tropicalization, robustness, pixel shift, GPS and astrotracer, sensor stabilizer Cons: Resellability, so many do not understand this brand Opinion: A tank, robustness feels instantly, both in touch and when you press any button. The raw file has extreme workability, let alone pixel shift than exceptional color shades. Raw DNG file native. Ample Optical Optical Parks; Stabilizer on the sensor. Great White Balance Automatically. GPS with astrotracer posing B follows the motion of the stars for up to 5 minutes offering the ability to make nightmares impossible for other brands without using a trackster sent on July 14, 2017 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 25mm f/1.4 ASPH Pros: f1.4 aperture, detachment of compatteza plans without a hood, autofocus Cons: hood, no dual IS Opinion: very compact optical course if you do not mount the huge hood; full aperture but also closing some stop gives a nice dividend of unknown plans of other objective, but never in fact updated firmware you can not enjoy the dual IS the latest panasonic bodies, autofocus still quite fast, quality still images online with name despite the fairly low price, very good even in macro thanks to the working distances in focus sent on February 13, 2017 |
 | Panasonic GX80 / GX85 Pros: Compactness, menus, optical park, flash, stabilizer, overall speed, jpeg files, videos 4k, creative filters, built-in flash Cons: Battery life, external microphone attack Opinion: I took this camera on the advice of my dealer about the stabilizer, I am really amazed of the structure, steel seems, is dual stabilizer, I can now to use my optical vintage with very different time than a camera without a stabilizer. the menu is very full of features without being tangled. Battery life is a bit ' "ridiculous" in the sense that if you always have the display on, lasts very little. Screen very responsive touch and a very good reading even under the light, what I like most is the reactivity, very good, very fast autofocus, lightning if you set "precise focus," some days I'm trying also l ' af-c with tracking and I feel very good but I want to do other tests. One thing that surprised me is in the last days is that the JPEG file is very good already in the room, in the sense that doing a little 'PP I am having trouble getting stessthe results and this is very positive. Panasonic and Olympus Optical Park exterminated. The videos are very good, with dual image stabilization and electronic stabilization video seems almost shot on a tripod or on a professional equipment, built-in flash does his duty and is equipped with a joint that can be directed towards the ceiling to create a bouncing light, simple but ingenious sent on January 28, 2017 |
 | Samsung NX1 Pros: Tropicalization, illuminated sensor, optics with incredible value for money, volley, overhead display and exceptional quality, 4k video, WiFi, Bluetooth, ability to command it to smartphones, battery life good chance 'of focus with a touch on screen, frequency firmware upgrade, over 200 points of focus for 99% of the viewfinder Cons: Today few optics, Samsung and Samyang and recently also Lensbaby Opinion: Tried for two days thanks to the store "The amateur photographer" in Milan, after this test I sold all the equipment Nikon, the thing that struck me the most was not the burst (I do not need 15 shots per second) was quality of the file, the image of the details that so far I had not found in other cameras, the image to magnify the PC and crumble before it takes !! I come from Nikon D610 and was stunned by the ability to take pictures in low light, it should in fact raise the ISO less than other bodies, especially compared to the D610, about sensor Backlit. You can 'focus on an object or a person with only a touch screen. Points of focus more 'than 200 occupying 99% of what you see in the viewfinder. Body very ergonomic and lightweight, more portable than a classic SLR although larger than other mirrorless. Samsung has already mom ', issued several firmware updates that have riguardato especially auto-focus, and in fact I found it more responsive and precise. The only drawback is that the optics are so far only Samsung and Samyang, (recently also Lensbaby) otherwise would recommend it strongly without a doubt, unfortunately, the vast majority of people look at and judge the brand why not try this camera has not broken through but those who have tried did not remain delusornPer me voting is 9.9 !! Not worth 10 for just two reasons (in my opinion) does not have the stabilizer in the camera body and I do not lose to Samsung because it had both the economic potential and technical, also could take it from Pentax as they have had some collaboration in a even very recent past, and the second reason why I did not give vote of ten is because they have produced a Pentax lens adapter that does not transmit automatism, if they did, and then you could use all Pentax lenses with all the automatic would destroy all other mirrorless and I do not knowthe sent on October 14, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
