RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Marco_80
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marco_80



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Marco_80


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

sigma_17-50_f2-8_osSigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM

Pros: 2.8 fixed aperture, sharpness, speed AF

Cons: Focus ring that rotates in AF

Opinion: I took about 3 weeks ago for this light to replace the Nikon D90 kit lens from 18-105 to have that extra piu.rnrnSubito tested to see if my copy was suffering from front / back focus. All ok.rnSu Nikon D90 fortunately there is not even the problem of incompatibility does remain on the display after shooting foto.rnrnLa overall sharpness is more than fair to even 2.8 to 50mm and focus fast in good lighting conditions .rnrnPerò I noticed some flaws: rnFocus mooooooolto inaccurate when light conditions are scarce! Just can not control the soggetto.Sul 18-105 was better! RNLA focus ring that rotates while using the auto focus is annoying! If by chance (and it happens often) you happen to keep your fingers on while using the autofocus and strive feel rotate the ring by issuing a "worrying" metallic whine ... :( rnrnA full aperture, by blurring sincerely I expected much more .....! rnIl 50 mm f / 1.8 Nikon mostly blurred considerably exceedore..rnCmq recommend

sent on July 20, 2015


manfrotto_mk393hManfrotto MK 393-H

Pros: Practicality, lightness, stability

Cons: For now no

Opinion: It 'a good compromise. Good price (paid 69euro from amateur). I have the version MK393-HM black, aesthetically elegant and finished well. All the components seem well made and the overall feeling is of a solid object, despite its weight enough contenuto.rnIn a moment you place it, stretch your legs, blocks, set the height. The main lever, the one who runs the swing back and forth apparently seems little functional but not so (in the sense that goes strinta much to block your camera body and stop it in a asssoluta.) RnL'ho tried with my Nikon D90 with a 70-300 above and in any position you orient the locking plate is ottimo.rnrnLa quick release is very very comfortable and functional! rnPromosso ..

sent on December 29, 2014


nikon_d90Nikon D90

Pros: Solid machine body with all the necessary buttons placed at the point giusto.Durata battery.

Cons: Noise quite evident above 800 ISO.

Opinion: I bought this machine recently (autumn 2013), even though I was aware that it was now rather dated. Lowering the price, the countless positive reviews and the advice of a friend who owned it convinced me to buy this. rnQuando keep it in mano..ti realize that the body has nothing to do with the entry-level D3000 / D5000. We are on another livello.rnrnL'ho juice and I am continuing to squeeze it day by day and I realize that more and more that you learn to know that you can enhance it making you give me Result sorprendenti.rnrnSecondo gives the best of himself in the night pictures obviously if you place a 3piedi and give him a good 15-30 sec shutter. In these situations, the sensor can pull out details that you would never have believed it possible to vedere.rn So far I've used it with 18-105 vr with a 50ino AF 1.8D and with the Tamron 70-300 vc series -USD. The color rendition of the latter two objectives is eccellente.rnMe I will keep for a very long tempo..con the belief that it is better to invest in good optics on bodies that stainna more recent with a lot of functionality ridiculous and unnecessary ... rnConcludo billion MPX saying that the battery life is incredibile..rnrn

sent on June 11, 2014


tamron_70-300vcTamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD

Pros: Stabilizer exaggerated price

Cons: Stabilizing a bit 'noisy. Hood overly large (as long as the objective closed) that prevents the use of the zoom lens when mounted on the contrary.

Opinion: The details of construction are not very accurate: the lever of on-off stabilizer is pretty ridiculous. The cap rises / put in a somewhat difficult compared to the original ones are ok Nikon..però piccolezze.rnLo stabilizer is quite noisy ... but when you engage the subject ... is a show! A 300 mm image freezes !! Focus rather reattivo..rnLa sharpness is excellent up to 200mm after falls a bit 'but it's still on discrete levels. The focus is esageratornDisattivate stabilizer when using a 3ppiedi, otherwise the image will be completely moved, which however I had happened conaltre optical Nikon.rnrnLo council as an alternative of 70-300 Vr2 Nikon.rn

sent on June 06, 2014


nikon_50_f1-8dNikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D

Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, and lightness!

Cons: No One

Opinion: Even for me it was the first lens bought for my D90 (after 18-105 found in KIT) .rnL'ho found a hundred euro and I think it is worth at least twice! I tried the anke 1.4G what 3 times as much but in my opinion between the one and the other, the yield is identical! So if you do not need the autofocus on the lens you should take 50 1.8D. rnrnE 'the lens ideal for close-up photos to the evenings with friends, ceremonies, indoors with little luce.rnrn The maximum aperture of 1.8 is shown only to create an intense focus in the neighborhood of the focus point fire, then this opening is not really suited to take pictures with a face because if you focus your nose all the rest will be blurred !!! But that's the beauty of this light! RnrnSe f2.5 close to a first floor you are exaggerated, clear and soft at the right point with a nice background blur! If you close the iris still above the 3.5 begins to come out a sharpness hallucinating that leaves you stunned! rnI returned colors are nice and bright withcontrast well calibrato.rnrnQuesto object is so small and light that you do not even seem to have it attached to the camera, as there will be plasticky pare..ma ki cares, mica must hit the wall to see if it is resistant not ?! rnConsiglio keeping it dietro.rn

sent on June 03, 2014


nikon_18-105dx_vrNikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR

Pros: Very versatile, ideal as a lens to travel.

Cons: Distortion and vignetting at 18 mm to 105 mm obvious. Color rendering disappointing.

Opinion: 26egrave; likely to sell and you buy new lenses, but my advice is to keep it because as I said the chance to take it back on the road capita..prima or poi..rn Who says VR is not effective reply: this is a str ..... Zata! the VR is great. I took photos in Night-time freehand with 105mm lens that came egregiamente.rn

sent on June 03, 2014




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me