|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pie11 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pie11  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Patona Premium LP-E6 Pros: Aesthetic Cons: Durability and reliability Opinion: I took two for the 5div, from new lasted already less than the originals, now after six months last few shots. Of cons, so black, are more desing of the original Canon I do not recommend, I had already had a bad experience with Pantona on bp511 and a good on the LP-E4. Money thrown away, I can't even send her back, to avoid sent on May 25, 2019 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Weight, construction, AF Cons: Colors, contrast, flare, sharpness, distortion, chromatic aberration, price Opinion: Tried several times because on the cards it looks like a perfect optics for the A7, lightweight compact and with a brand that hopes for optical quality. At first I thought I had to deal with badly born specimens, today I think those born well should still arrive.rnrnOttica beautiful and well-built, but with a bad image quality, inferior to good kit optics (canon / nikon 28- 105 / 3.5-4.5) at the end of the 90's. 24 mm the edges never become sharp, the distortion is very high. 70mm is not clear even at the center. Just fine sharpness between 35 and 50mm. And I'm talking about tests on a7s.rnChief the diaphragm does not improve. RnrnColor and contrast are bad at all focal points, there seems to be dirty glass in front of the lens. RnrnDo avoid. sent on October 21, 2017 |
 | Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness, weight, distortion, autofocus, blur Cons: Size, contrast and colors, price Opinion: Good optics, one of the best made by sony.rnPer how i mean the sony kit (compact, light and decently luminous) I find that a lens to be missing along with the 28 / 2.rnThe sharpness is already good on all the frame at 1 /1.8. The longitudinal chromatic aberration wire present is never annoying. It's a 85mm / 1.8, but reasonably lightweight. The color and contrast are not the same as the best lenses, although sony did very rarely better. In this respect the 85 gm is far worse. RnCanican equivalents are more or less the same level, but considerably cheaper. sent on August 10, 2017 |
 | Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpen in the center at full aperture, closing the diaphragm the sharp area widens to reach the angles af / 4.rnSfocato non malvagio Cons: Autofocus very slow and inaccurate, I think the worst optics I've seen in this aspect. The manual focusing is definitely uncomfortable for the delay caused by the slow motor af.rn longitudinal chromatic aberration worthy of the worst optics of kitrnPoco contrast and bad tolerance to FlarernShadow chromaticity in strong contrast, well away from the best opticsVignette generosarnOver exaggerated price for quality.rn Opinion: I took it to have a normal e-mount, I find it embarrassing.rnI have thrown so many photos due to improper autofocus, poor contrast and generous purple fringing.rnIt's a problem of specimens, I've also tried other .rnrnOctica tends to be avoided, but I want a normal compact and I do not find alternatives to the 55 / 1.8 which I find too expensive and a bit too long. RnBack because the sharpness is there and in poor contrast it has a good Image quality.rn Blurry in low contrast conditions is pleasing.rnrnrn sent on August 10, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
