|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Clipper www.juzaphoto.com/p/Clipper  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Venus Laowa 4mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Small, light, fun. Cons: Lightly cropped and ac in the circular edge, easy to photograph your feet or hands holding the camera. Opinion: I use it with an Olympus Pen-F micro-4/3. A very practical lens to carry with you, it's anywhere. I use a circular crop to the photos to eliminate the edge that is slightly cropped and has chromatic aberrations; so much, having a 210-degree frame, there are absolutely no problems. One piece of advice that I would like to give, not to frame feet/panza/hands, is to use a small travel tripo to grip, and frame with the monitor holding the camera well forward. For the rest, it is the typical lens with which to have fun finding and inventing unthinkable shots. sent on September 21, 2020 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 50-200mm f/2.8-4 ASPH. OIS Pros: Dimensions and weight at focal and opening. Close-up of 6.5 cm. Cons: Price. Opinion: I often turn to fields and woods around the house in the country; My problem (I consider myself a traveling photographer) is to pass from wanting to photograph a fawn, then a Jay and, finally, a butterfly or any insect nearby. So far I adapted with 12-100 for butterflies and insects and 75-300 (which I used up to 200mm as it becomes more soft) for birdlife. The 50-200 makes me the ideal lens for this genre; At the maximum focal photographer (as close-up) 6.5 cm in width (col 12-100 I arrived at 7.5) and I have 200mm brighter than almost one and a half stops of the 75-300. Making direct comparisons with 12-100 and 75-300 to me results (a TA for all): a 50mm slightly lower than 12-100; A 100mm better than 12-100 and equal to 75-300; 150mm and 200mm substantially equal to the 75-300. All the minimum differences I have noticed, however, enlarged at least 200%, and taking into account that with 75-300 I have "cannato" more photos than Col 50-200, both as MAF and as a micro-blur. I do not practice the street but, by eye, it seems a suitable target. sent on July 26, 2018 |
 | Zenit MC 3M-5CA 500mm f/8 Pros: Price; quality with good light; there are adapters with tripod mount. Cons: Difficulty of maf; reduced pdc; particular bokeh. Opinion: Bought on ebay a few tens of euro when I had not yet canvas for the m43. I struggled at first, but it gave me some satisfaction that I could not take off. Difficult to manage, until you understand, 9 photos out of 10 are to be thrown; later, however, it is so much power. In post production, especially over long distances, we need to recover contrast and sharpening, but we discover details that were not expected to appear in the photo.rn sent on January 09, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: Sharpness, convenience, general quality. Cons: Dimensions, weight (all compared to the m43) Opinion: The typical lens of traveling; When I'm around I love taking pictures of everything, I can go from photographing a butterfly all'inquadrare a seagull flying. The facade of a Baroque church it can draw, but then the eye focuses on the canopy or other particolari.rnPrima I used a 14-150, but 14mm were often too long and the quality of the unsatisfactory edges; now with 12mm I have a field that is able to cover the majority of the photos, 100mm enough to detail and quality is to massimo.rnA all this is added the possibility of making discrete close-up.rnRispetto to 12-40 I did not notice differences in quality, and the integrated stabilizer, which works with that of the machine, allows to recover a large part of the stop differenza.rnSe you search for a handyman lens for m43 this is the alternative to the PRO 14-150; if you go back the buy back. sent on April 26, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
