Reviews written by Ruggero Poggianella

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Ruggero Poggianella
www.juzaphoto.com/p/RuggeroPoggianella

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Ruggero Poggianella

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

Pros: Optical stabilized, precise autofocus, crisp, dry, engraved. superb detail. Ability to mount filters. High resistance to flare. Excellent chromaticism.

Cons: F 2.8 would be better, but the VRII system is very efficient. Bulky and a little heavy, but it covers a FX sensor.

Opinion: Bought after moving from DX to FX. I had 12 24 mm f 4.0 and 16 35 mm This is another planet. More precise, crisp, dry and really well stabilized. A 16 mm can not get razor sharp shots at 1/8 freehand. Heavier, but on the D800 body is well balanced, and this provides additional support. color accuracy by fear. Only 4.0 af some problems (minimum) at the edges, very low aberration, and perfectly settled in PS and LR. One of my most well-chosen purchases, in photographs of interiors and the urban landscape is a lens 360 degrees.

sent on February 24, 2016

Nikon AF-S DX 12-24mm f/4 G ED

Pros: Focus is very quiet - and since this is a super wide angle is very limited in the excursion - to the point that I often wonder if the AF is activated or not. rnNitidezza, coloring and very little distortion (also useable with photoshop and / or lightroom) are his strengths. Flare almost completely absent, so that when intentionally I desire and seek, I struggle to get even the most extreme backlighting. rnAnche it is not cheap, the quality, especially wide open, it allows comparisons with products from other manufacturers. rnFavoloso in photos of architecture, interiors, and in all situations where the prospect (even forced) is at the service of an intensity of expression. rnAbbinato to my D800 images superlative returns.

Cons: It is a lens for all. Managing a 12mm focal length on DX format - ie 18mm on FX format - does not allow indecision or errors. The minimum howler prospective is amplified to the point of making the photo unusable. rnMa is not an issue of focus, it is a matter of perspective and optics knowledge.

Opinion: Bought used three years ago, not only I am satisfied and happy with what he gave me on the D300, but I am astonished that returns on the D800, which offers DX-format images from 18 megs of high quality. rnAbbinato to camera bodies so performance at very high sensitivity, I wonder if photos from the measurement of 100 x 150 FX need a fisheye eg. the 14-24mm f 2.8 I do not own and that will buy.

sent on March 05, 2013