|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pippopoint www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pippopoint  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X100F Pros: The joystick, the iso can now be used by its personal ring and the new sensor, as well as some other features such as the customizable double wheel on the front and behind the dx, and an additional and customizable pushbutton on the evf-ovf conversion lever. More durable and equal to older sisters, so you can switch between them. Digital zoom function at 50 and 70 mm fixed in jpg mode Cons: Indeed, someone has preceded me in the observation of slow storage, despite having inserted a 95mbs sd, just does not compare with the upper sisters. The iso-timing lever seems delicatine, as the same joistic, surely over time will create problems. Lack of lens hood on the lens, if photographed against light has much flare. Menu shabby compared to other machines I'm used to. Soft lens from f / 2 to f / 2.8 included, only improves from f / 3.5 onwards Opinion: Previously I had both x100t and xt-10, 2 great machines, and unfortunately deprived me of monetizing on optics L. Compared to x100t, some improvements have it, but it would not have been possible to change it if I still had the T, since the quality is indistinguishable, in fact the objective in my opinion, being the same, did very well on the 16mpx, but even here cmq does not disagree. The battery now lasts twice the T, and its files are improved. Also nice is the 50-70 electronic zoom, a shame that can only be used in jpg recording mode, so it's worth cropping the file, as it now has 24mpx. Lightweight, pocket-sized and of great quality, I took it for the outdoors with the family and a bit of street when I want to do it. For the rest I would not dream of replacing it with reflexes for a wedding or an important event, although some famous photographers are also doing it sent on November 18, 2017 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: sharpness and chroma at optimum levels. af fast and accurate, no problem of f / b focus, blurred exceptional. Cons: a little big and not just to be a lightweight 35mm, but all in all on an SLR is its place Opinion: I bought this lens initially to make street, turned out to be an excellent lens even from portrait (which I prefer). Has saturated colors and excellent sharpness even at ta Delighted purchase. The thing that irritates me is that I think I did a fair revensione, but the robot or the rules necessarily want to be 350 characters. I do not know what else to write and fill this review with these stupid phrases to reach 350 characters sent on March 14, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm X100T Pros: Solid body and alloy and tropical, light, files exceptional noise almost absent until 3200, barely perceptible in 6400, full of features such as electronic rangefinder, focus assist with split image and magnification detector lights and shadows, and new controls rapid maf, optical viewfinder and electronic galeiliano, choice dynamic range and film simulation faithfully, in short other things that make this machine a technological jewel high-performance cameras Cons: small for those with large hands, cumbersome menu, fixed lens, Opinion: Hello everyone, after an excruciating dilemma I decided to take this new mirrorles compact, but unfortunately I own this machine from a single day, and I can only give the first impressions in the skin that are grossly reported in pro and against. In the next few days if I can go into the review of this little gem, trying to explain at least the optimal configuration for a yield to best sent on December 20, 2014 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness even at the edges according to my humble opinion, contrast, af speed and lack of chromatic aberration Cons: vignetting and distortion at room temperature (corrected) Opinion: I own this lens for about a month, taken in tandem with the 6d, and strongly supported than the kit with 24-105, because of its good features decanted into several parts after several tests and usi.rnPurtroppo I have not used yet very because here is a month now that it rains every day, and go out to check its sealing, it should be my health because I am not weather sealed against the elements:-D. rnLe tests done at home I was fully satisfied, and although I'm not an expert in tests and reviews, my impression is very good as far as my eye can see compared to other lenses I had. sent on April 08, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: I can not express the excitement, more of everything, dall'af shutter speed is the flexibility iso data quality at high iso, features improved and expanded menus and buttons. In short, drawing a comparison with more features, but a 7d FF. Cons: They could make an effort to put a sincroflash faster, at least one 250s as the 7d. Opinion: I own this car 1 week, bought to complement the 6d with the tamron 24-70 vc f.2.8 taken a few weeks before, which I had to buy them commute with the 5dmk2, 7d and the second optical quality APSC. For the work I do sometimes I need 2 cars, and for the quality it offers 5dmk3 this was the best choice. In practice, I am very satisfied with all that he has, and I think now having reached peace of mind on quality will be in place for all eternity, until retirement do us part:-D sent on April 08, 2013 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: AF improved, wi-fi, gps, excellent performance at high iso files, fast fps, manageability iso minmax from the menu. Cons: Lightweight and non alloy buttons moved and decreased attack syncroflash missing sync flash decreased, speed time decreased, SD Memory Card delicate for my opinion Opinion: The transition from my 5dmk2 to 6d was not completely painless, I immediately felt that I described in the lack of contrast, and lightness senzo gave me the impression of having a toy in his hand than the 5dmk2 and 7d I had. Slowly I'm ricredendo based mainly on the quality of the files that churns especially at high ISO, and lightness that ultimately can not make me just fine. Too bad for time attacks ee revolutionized keys and left for a machine that basically by physical store costs as much as or more than a 5dmk2. I think you could leave them unchanged just like the 5dmk2. Gps useful, especially for nature photography and reporters who will always know where you took that particular photo at the expense of an early battery consumption. Satisfied instead of the af improvement and the ability to enter a value min max of iso sent on April 08, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: detail, clarity and absence of noise even at high ISO. Light solid Cons: af slow and imprecise, with species as targets with low light, slow burst, setting improvement. Opinion: I own my first FF 5D mkII after 3 aps-c for 10 days, finally for individual display to my 7d flaw that the noise of high ISO, but that has nothing to do with technology that incorporates. It could have been improved af, but considering it is an old car benoltre 4 years, you could not get any better. I have not tested yet the full power, even for the little I have done seems rather let me down, but a survey online, has a different perspective riguasdo especially the pdf that if not balanced feel the difference between a aps-c and a ff, cmq is the fact that it is a matter of taste and adaptation to the maneuverability to get the best. Hopefully I get used to it early to fully appreciate the full potential of this machine. sent on December 06, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
