|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Rusvelt2000 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Rusvelt2000  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6 G ED Pros: Good yield, non-existent weight, price, good sharpness Cons: dim, the absence of VR feels, external focus Opinion: C I recommend it if you are looking for a lens to learn more about the use of the telephoto lens. I could go back I would do the same choice to buy it, you will not be disappointed! sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro Pros: Perfect focus, incredible sharpness, VR impeccable, beautiful blurred, also great for portraits Cons: Weight, no tripod socket Opinion: Objective fantastic, the best I have in my set. Surprisingly immediately for its sharpness and speed of focus in close ups (even if in the macro is better to work in manual). Long hood and functional lens free of chromatic aberration, catches the eye the perfect solidity and construction, in short, a very respectable lens that is worth what it costs. A bit 'slower in focus in portraits but has the ability to reduce the ring of MAF to speed up the action. VR excellent workmanship that allows you to work in a shorter time without using a tripod. Recommended by 10 votes without any second thoughts. rnUnico defect: the absence of a tripod socket, which would return very useful to balance the weight on the same stand (7 ects are not a few), not that it is impractical to use, but for a more good stability would require a head for stand firmer. sent on February 17, 2013 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: Great body, robust and ergonomically acceptable weight, it lasts the ISO a little higher, dual slots for memory cards, internal level. Cons: A slot between the two CF cards would have been great. Live view a bit slow and not reclining Opinion: I upgraded from a Nikon d3100 and I really opened up a new world from the first moment I put my hands on this camera body. It's all at your fingertips, you change aperture, ISO, time, compensation, exposure and another in the blink of an eye. I tried shooting at high ISO and the performance is spectacular until 6400. In hand with a sense of compactness and excellent build quality, good and firm presa.rnÈ a camera body that allows you to experiment with photography from A to Z and is fully compatible with all optics (unlike the d3100 that do not was for those of the full frame format). Has an internal level that indicates the angle of the machine, either in vertical or horizontal position (very useful to shorten the setting). I found a live view is not very fluid, yet precise in focus for pictures in macro. I admit that I would have liked that it was reclining, I think every model should now have this variant. The double slot for memory card è useful if you are away from home for days, although in my opinion one of the two slots accept CF cards. Nothing negative, however, in general, very good compromise as a whole. RnNel Overall a great purchase, which I'm proud of and that I would do it with your eyes closed. Consigliatarn sent on January 07, 2013 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Autofocus immediate, excellent field of view, very good quality / price Cons: Maybe a little dark Opinion: Great lens that makes it the right time and costs. The materials are great, autofocus is a chip and also the sharpness on the first floor offers beautiful emotions. IMHO that creates the flare in backlit situations is not the best, but it remains contained and easy to remove with a simple touch in post production if you do not want him. For the rest, nothing to say, I'm happy with the choice fatta.rnUnica precaution in the days when I bought it (about a year ago) I read it, and unfortunately I read here that some models have problems related to lack of sharpness at the edges of but fortunately I have not encountered this problem in my view, but before buying I did a test in the store to see the results. Council then to anyone who wants to buy at least one test before leaving to beat the ticket seller! In this case provatene more than one (if they are available in store). Rn sent on January 07, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Flexibility of use, good quality medium aperture Cons: Lack zoom lock, slight vignetting Opinion: It is a good compromise for a day when you do not want to carry around the entire arsenal, covering all areas. At the beginning had a 18-55 and a 55-200 which I used for the same purposes, not known much difference, if not in a greater brightness in favor of 18-200. The stabilized it well and also the sharpness is more than enough to average aperture (between f8 and f16). A 200mm is softer and also the stabilizer can not do miracles to these distances, but what is claimed by a scale so variable in one goal? rnNel Overall a good objective, practical and effective, I bought it used and the manual focus ring was slightly slow, but flows that are fiction and not betray when required in situations hasty. The only flaw is the lack of a zoom lock switch, because with the passage of time, the mechanisms, loosening, leaving stretch zooming when placed vertically when carrying over the shoulder, but mind you, not that it stretches forever, but can happen if solicited by one scossone. A simple zoom lock (present in the new version) would fix it with no problems. sent on January 07, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Low cost, excellent sharpness and brightness, autofocus immediate attack metal. Cons: No Opinion: I purchased this light used and it was love immediately (although on my 3100 I could not use the autofocus). It 'superb lens for portraits on APS-c and, if appropriate an extension tube could also be a great lens macro.rnLa sharpness is amazing even at fully open aperture, 1, 8f allows you to play with close-up quai like a macro, and high brightness does the rest for the creation of amazing images. Also good for speed in focus (I now have a d7000 and then I finally got to try it), and actions for moving gives good images. Unfortunately it is not anymore and has been replaced with a lens of the same level, but the advice in case you want to save something in the world of used saw that has nothing to envy to his heir in the current store shelves. sent on January 06, 2013 |
 | Nikon D3100 Pros: Quality / price ratio, excellent raw files and jpeg, light, battery life, good up to 800 ISO (slightly less in 1600) Cons: Incompatibility with optical ff, No flash commander, no infrared receiver Opinion: I had the pleasure to start the picture with a great entry level of this caliber, weight and overhead, high image quality and the convenience sector Nikon. The only flaws are: 1) non-compatibility with the objectives of such industry's most advanced full-frame, in my case I bought a Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D used (a real blade sharpness), but the lens was compatible not auto focus (however I learned to work in manual mode, all the better in the end ...), 2) the absence of a built-in flash commander to command second flash (I had to buy a cable to remotarlo, therefore somewhat inconvenient) . RNLA highly recommend despite being released the new 3200 with 10 megapixels in most (not the mpx that make the difference in a photograph, at least not have to bet to elaborate murals). Great for all those who are curious to explore the wonderful world of photography and treat yourself great emotions through this body. sent on January 06, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
