|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Widemediaphotography www.juzaphoto.com/p/Widemediaphotography  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A6600 Pros: Speed and precision AF, 11 fps gust, RAW file quality, Battery life, compactness and ergonomics, Construction Quality, Good ISO Seal, Stabilizer Presence, Reversible Screen Cons: Price, viewfinder and display improveable, Rec button in uncomfortable position, lack of built-in flash, rolling shutter Opinion: I've done all the Sony draw at5000, a6000, a6300, a6500 and often shoot with A7III. Already the 6500 I considered it a semi-professional if not professional, this new Top APS-C I consider it a full-fledged professional, also considering that now in the House Sony you have two new optical performances such as the 16-55f2.8 and the 70-350mm OSS that complete the system. Compared to the already good at 6500 the Autofocus has been further improved in both precision and possibilities, in particular the eye focus no longer has uncertainties. Even on the ISO seal, although it is said, especially on video has improved. The desired improvements on the 3 limits of the a6500 1)Battery life increased from 350 to 800 clicks, 2) The 30-minute recording limit was eliminated, 3) Added reversible screen for Vloggers. The menu has also been improved by adding an entire section of customizations. Convenient to add another function key. The body now has a more generous grip, all for the benefit of ergonomics and is also tropicalized. The insertion of generously sized optics, such as 70-350mm or 18-105mm, no longer returns that feeling of imbalance or insecurity. It was not enough. I have the opportunity to compare it often to the A7III and there are increasingly rare cases where there are noticeable differences between the two cameras. In fact, an upgrade that would now allow for an appreciable improvement of the IQ is represented only by the 42Mpx onwards, and therefore by the A7R3 to rise. It is true that the R2 has a better IQ, but it is outclassed in AF and burst by the a6600. The Sony APS-C system is now very mature and has a truly complete range of optics, considering that all recent FF optics are perfectly performing in APS-C. It was desirable to improve the stabilizer that remained unchanged from the a6500, as well as the rolling shutter that remains present exactly as for all younger sisters. In short, the a6600 is a professional compact with many quality optics available in the Sony, Sigma, Zeiss, Samyang, Tamron, etc. catalogs without the need for disliked adapters. sent on July 06, 2020 |
 | Samyang 500mm f/6.3 MC IF Pros: Value for money, compactness Cons: Insensitive focus adjustment, sharpness, adapter need Opinion: Purchased for a few pennies, a precious lens was immediately detected in my Sony APS-C kit. The stabilized sensor of the a6500 allowed me some usability even without tripoid. I often paired it with a 2X teleconverter giving me an equivalent field angle of 1500mm (Photographed car number plates more than 1km away) The focus adjustment ring deserved a less soft mechanism and above all more multiplied, because a stable microregulation is impossible. The lack of sharpness is felt, but at that price what to expect from a catadiotic lens? Tripod practically obligatory. Very recommended for what it costs. sent on April 13, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
