RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Franco_63
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Franco_63



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Franco_63


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

olympus_xz2Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Pros: Optics and final yield excellent for quality and yield.

Cons: Sightist not present except as an accessory.

Opinion: Taken out of curiosity a couple of years ago knowing the skills of her older sister Stylus1, at first I was puzzled by the size of her not really generous sensor, so as a first test I took some evening photos in the blue hour, fundamental test for me, well no I was so amazed at the yield that I preferred it to the reflex I had, for so many reasons. By setting its many settings well you get perfect photos, even at the level of electronic noise considering its sensor, in addition to the fact that I shoot only at 100 ISO , never at higher sensitivities, has beautiful colors, an optical for me right and essential for its focal, 28 - 112 mm, an excellent opening of f1.8 - 2.5 , I also have a wide-angle converter of excellent workmanship of the Konica-Minolta that brings the focal to 21 mm in case of need, which I never use but from some tests made of an excellent yield ,excellent stabilization that between it and the large opening allows excellent shots with low sensitivity. It has many other applications such as various filters and more that I never use, for now, built-in flash, sled for external flash and external electronic viewfinder, as well as an excellent solid and compact metal construction. I shoot directly in to jpg because the files come out perfect from the camera and do not need special shrewdness in the PP. A travel camera that does not make the reflex regret, at least the mid-range ones. I gave away reflex and lenses replacing them with this compact except for the type of photonaturalisal that needs appropriate equipment.

sent on August 04, 2019


canon_50_f1-8stmCanon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM

Pros: Excellent sharpness, quiet af.

Cons: Too light, moreover, for what it costs nothing could be better.

Opinion: B just a great goal at a ridiculous price, definitely with better performance of similar lenses of the same focal length but much higher price, a good target cost of a hood and two original caps, not bad.

sent on July 17, 2015


canon_400_f5-6Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM

Pros: Optical quality, light weight.

Cons: no one

Opinion: I took just this purpose, a real gem for value for money, very affected even at full aperture, very beautiful color rendition, very maneggevole.rnAvevo of perplexity about two functions very important to me, the stabilization and the minimum distance of maf, in this case 3.5 m, too much for my needs, I solved this brilliantly by adding an extension tube canon EF 12mm, in practice now the minimum distance of maf is about 2.5 to 2.6 meters from the front lens (it is true that the minimum distance is measured by the maf sensor, but in practice I do I measure from the front lens), the light loss is minimal, the value of 1/3 stop, and both the quality perspective, the focus speed are not affected in the least, the loss of infinity maf normally I do not care because I dedicate a lot of work to mimicry and subjects are always close, however, the maximum distance of maf is about 13-14 meters, if serves nonetheless takes off immediately the pipe prolunga.rnPer regardstabilization Instead I've found no limit, indeed, in comparison with the Sigma 150-500 I had camera shake is virtually nil in the canon, of course, for the fact that my photographic genre exclusively or click on the bag or on a tripod, in the case then you were photographing a subject in flight is irrelevant stabilization, maybe some will find it limit who makes wildlife photography vagante.rnper the rest I only found out this fantastic optical qualities.

sent on August 22, 2014


manfrotto_054q5Manfrotto 054 QR5

Pros: Excellent build quality and materials used, excellent leak tightness of the weight plate ideal for telephoto lenses, fluidity of movement.

Cons: No one

Opinion: I use this with a tripod head Manfrotto 055 pro carbon, an excellent match for the scope and lightness, very solid and precise movements, the predominant use with telephoto lens, its best feature for my needs is keeping the weight and fluidity by regulating the clutch so that all the weight of the equipment is moved in any direction without blocking completely the tightening knob and at the same time the whole remains in position without any sagging, practically as the operation of the heads rocker but with the advantage of the small size.

sent on August 15, 2014




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me